Marouane Fellaini image 27

Marouane Fellaini Belgium flag

2014-15 Performances


View full 2014-15 profile

5.9 Season Average Rating
Appearances
31
Goals
7
Assists
2
Yellow cards
7
Red cards
1
Status
Not open for further replies.

shamans

Thinks you can get an STD from flirting.
Joined
Oct 25, 2010
Messages
18,226
Location
Constantly at the STD clinic.
I'm probably his biggest fan on here - defended him all throughout last season. But.. I have to say, he was outplayed today. Don't think it's a big issue. We're still a recovering team and we'll have off days/players will have off games. In the long run I still believe he's essential to us.
 

Kostur

海尔的老板
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
28,749
Location
Poland, Kraków
This. Not a chance he should have finished the match. Should have been pulled at the 60 minute mark (you can understand why Falcao was kept on with our injuries). Should have been AdM for Fellaini, with Mata going central.
I really can't.
 

Anustart89

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
15,955
I'm probably his biggest fan on here - defended him all throughout last season. But.. I have to say, he was outplayed today. Don't think it's a big issue. We're still a recovering team and we'll have off days/players will have off games. In the long run I still believe he's essential to us.
Just shows how good he's been recently when the opponent sacrifices his team's ability to play the ball by putting a defender in midfield to counter his thread.
 

Walrus

Oppressed White Male
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
11,165
He had a quiet game absolutely, but that is because Mourinho set up his entire team around countering him [Fellaini].

We dominated the entire game, and make no mistake that a big part of that was due to Mourinho's negative tactics - like putting Zouma at CM.

Yes, this nullified a lot of Fellaini's game but it
a) Also nullified Chelsea's ability to retain possession and actually play football.
b) [Should have] created space for our other players. Our left side was once again where all of our most promising moves came from - can anyone seriously say that this was just a coincidence?

To me it was obvious that Fellaini was occupying several Chelsea players, which freed up space for Young and Shaw to attack down the left.
 

prateik

Full Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Messages
42,185
They were all poor today. Chelsea were well organized. We had the ball. Couldnt do much with it.
Young was ineffective. Mata was ineffective. Ander made a few bad errors.
 

Kostur

海尔的老板
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
28,749
Location
Poland, Kraków
It seems RvP wasn't fit enough for even a 10 minute spell.

So for the sake of "balance", Rooney needed to stay in midfield.

Any idea where Wilson is? Injured?
Think Wilson was back in either reserves or u21s recently so he's probably gaining fitness. To be fair I'd put just anything up front, maybe even move Fellaini to #9 instead of keeping Falcao for so long.

As for Fellaini, as everybody has said so far, quiet game, still managed to make one or two chances (cross to Falcao in the box is the first one that comes to my mind), makes me wonder though why LVG didn't re-think everything when it was obvious since day one that Zouma will play and man-mark Fellaini, throw Matić on top and it's pretty much it.
 

Ekeke

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
53,297
Location
Hope, We Lose
I thought he was okay despite Zouma being put on him. He still had a couple of decent turns and a pullback or two. I think for the most part the extra attention just meant he wasnt going to get many shots away
 

DWelbz19

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
34,053
Very poor performance. Just a bit more proof he shouldn't be a sure starter next season but a specialised squad option.
 
Last edited:

AllezLesDiables

Full Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2012
Messages
1,809
Can't lay too much blame on Fellaini he created two dynamic chances in the box. He was being shadowed around the field by Zouma.

Put a lot more on other players for failing to take advantage of the space
 

DWelbz19

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
34,053
Same goes for Mata, ADM, Young and Rooney then as well I guess?
If Rooney is going to be used in central midfield like that, yes. Mata is similarly as toothless without Ander in proximity, and I assume Di Maria was chucked in to further your point, as he barely saw the ball in the 15th minutes he got.
 

FlawlessThaw

most 'know it all' poster
Joined
Oct 26, 2005
Messages
29,602
To be honest given the line up Mourinho went with we should have countered that by playing Fellaini in the defensive midfield with Herrera further forward and possibly Di Maria in midfield with Rooney up front. May have been a good time to have changed the system given how Fergie himself worked out how to nullify the Fellaini up front threat and it was always obvious Mourinho would start Zouma.
 

Kostur

海尔的老板
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
28,749
Location
Poland, Kraków
If Rooney is going to be used in central midfield like that, yes. Mata is similarly as toothless without Ander in proximity, and I assume Di Maria was chucked in to further your point, as he barely saw the ball in the 15th minutes he got.
So we're fecked and need to buy new 4 attacking players who are of better quality than those mentioned above?
 

kps88

Full Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2008
Messages
22,513
Very poor performance. Just a bit more proof he shouldn't be a sure starter next season but more of an effective squad option.
He's not going to come up against Zouma and Matic every game.
 

Raw

Full Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2013
Messages
25,433
Location
Manchester, UK
Mourinho got it right by sticking Zouma on him all game. Didn't he do the same in another game? May have been Spurs in the League Cup final.

Nothing went right for him, Chelsea just had all our attacking outlets closed down effectively.
 

DWelbz19

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
34,053
So we're fecked and need to buy new 4 attacking players who are of better quality than those mentioned above?
If we are going to use Rooney in central midfield yes. An #8 is already on our agenda, as is another winger, who will rotate with Mata. Why four? I already touched on Di Maria and he will be key next season.
 

R'hllor

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
15,419
Zouma was on him 24/7 and by doing that he left so much space,space used by our CB,think if we had Carrick or Blind,we would exploit that space way better.
 

Kazi

Full Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2013
Messages
11,319
Location
SIIIUUUUUU
He set up good chances for Rooney and Falcao, and made some good clearances from their set pieces. But a below average game overall.

Rooney and Herrera should have made better use of the space he created. Mata too. Most of the time, we just elected to go for a shot from 25+ yards out.
 

Kostur

海尔的老板
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
28,749
Location
Poland, Kraków
If we are going to use Rooney in central midfield yes. An #8 is already on our agenda, as is another winger, who will rotate with Mata. Why four? I already touched on Di Maria and he will be key next season.
I mention di Maria because I have no certainty that he'll be a key player next season, as it stands he can't really displace Young from the XI. Other than that, fair enough, can't see us spunking so much cash because if we're about to get players who are certainly of better quality than Mata, Rooney (even if we're talking about CM here), Fellaini and ADM(?) it will cost us feckloads of money.
 

beergod

Full Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2002
Messages
2,749
He had a quiet game absolutely, but that is because Mourinho set up his entire team around countering him [Fellaini].

We dominated the entire game, and make no mistake that a big part of that was due to Mourinho's negative tactics - like putting Zouma at CM.

Yes, this nullified a lot of Fellaini's game but it
a) Also nullified Chelsea's ability to retain possession and actually play football.
b) [Should have] created space for our other players. Our left side was once again where all of our most promising moves came from - can anyone seriously say that this was just a coincidence?

To me it was obvious that Fellaini was occupying several Chelsea players, which freed up space for Young and Shaw to attack down the left.
Chelsea's tactics left us with a lot of space in midfield. We just didn't have the midfielders available to take advantage of it. If we had Carrick/Blind and Herrera isolated against Matic/Fabregas it could have been a much different game. He had a decent enough game despite all of the attention he received.
 

Boycott

Full Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2013
Messages
6,306
Maybe we could have switched him with Herrera for a bit. Herrera's energy could have split the defence up to allow Falcao and Fellaini/Rooney to take up spaces. We didn't really need a holding player as Chelsea were taking the game down to their tempo in possession.
 

Walrus

Oppressed White Male
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
11,165
Chelsea's tactics left us with a lot of space in midfield. We just didn't have the midfielders available to take advantage of it. If we had Carrick/Blind and Herrera isolated against Matic/Fabregas it could have been a much different game. He had a decent enough game despite all of the attention he received.
I agree - Rooney and Herrera found themselves quite a bit of space in the middle, and likewise Young and Shaw got into some good positions on the left. Basically space opened up all around Fellaini, and only a fool would think that he had no part in that.
 

MadDogg

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
15,974
Location
Manchester Utd never lose, just run out of time
He had a quiet game absolutely, but that is because Mourinho set up his entire team around countering him [Fellaini].

We dominated the entire game, and make no mistake that a big part of that was due to Mourinho's negative tactics - like putting Zouma at CM.

Yes, this nullified a lot of Fellaini's game but it
a) Also nullified Chelsea's ability to retain possession and actually play football.
b) [Should have] created space for our other players. Our left side was once again where all of our most promising moves came from - can anyone seriously say that this was just a coincidence?

To me it was obvious that Fellaini was occupying several Chelsea players, which freed up space for Young and Shaw to attack down the left.
Agreed. Fellaini struggled a little for the first 10 minutes or so, and there was a period around the 80th minute where his head seemed to drop and he struggled for a while, but for the rest of the match he was creating significant space for everyone else in there. Even though he wasn't able to dominate in the air like he normally does, he played a good part in passing and movement and allowing us to keep such good control of the midfield.

Was it a great match by him? Of course not. But it certainly wasn't a bad match either.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,638
Location
London
PhaseOfPlay has been saying for a long time that rival teams should man-mark Fellaini.

I think it was quite a bad performance from him today, but no harm on that. You can't always be Fellainho.
 

Walrus

Oppressed White Male
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
11,165
PhaseOfPlay has been saying for a long time that rival teams should man-mark Fellaini.

I think it was quite a bad performance from him today, but no harm on that. You can't always be Fellainho.
I always think that if the opposition is playing such close attention to one of our players that they need to alter their tactics substantially to counter that player, it is already job done. As in, Fellaini didnt have a great game but I am not going to blame him when Chelsea set up to counter him specifically - it meant that other players around him should have been able to utilise the extra space etc, which they did not (or if they did, we as a team did not capitalise on it).
 

berbatrick

Renaissance Man
Scout
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
21,705
It would've made sense to switch the midfield around after a while -- Herrera-Mata was not longer there since Herrera was the DM and Fellaini had Zouma + Ivanovic. Putting him against Azpilicueta + Matic/Zouma would've been interesting.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,638
Location
London
I always think that if the opposition is playing such close attention to one of our players that they need to alter their tactics substantially to counter that player, it is already job done. As in, Fellaini didnt have a great game but I am not going to blame him when Chelsea set up to counter him specifically - it meant that other players around him should have been able to utilise the extra space etc, which they did not (or if they did, we as a team did not capitalise on it).
I am not blaming him though. Just that I am saying that he wasn't good today (or was poor today), especially compared with some of his latest performances when he has been excellent.
 

Walrus

Oppressed White Male
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Messages
11,165
I am not blaming him though. Just that I am saying that he wasn't good today (or was poor today), especially compared with some of his latest performances when he has been excellent.
Its fair enough, I just wouldnt have really expected much else today from Fellaini, given that Mourinho set out specifically to nullify him. Only the very best players in the world are going to be able to deliver in such circumstances.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.