Zlatan Ibrahimovic |United Player | See the thread in the United Forum

Should we sign Ibra on a free this summer ?


  • Total voters
    1,389
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

An Irish Red

New Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2009
Messages
6,294
Location
Ros Earcáin/Tuaim/an Baile Meánach
I think Martial, Rashford and say, for example, Mkhitaryan/James Rodriguez could be excellent in a counter attacking front three. Very fluid and interchangeable too. Whether Ibra signs or not, I am sure that Rashford and Martial will still play an important role for us.
Rashford could be excellent but I certainly wouldn't want to rely on him over the course of a season.

We had nothing to lose last season; that's not the case this year. He should be a squad player at best.
 

StonedhamsterZA

Full Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2015
Messages
439
Location
South Africa
Besides everything else that I've commented on in terms of the Ibra signing, hopefully he will be able to impart some of the attitude on Martial and Rashford that has made him the footballer he is today, as well as mentoring some of his quality in front of goal.

There aren't a lot of strikers out there that are his level of quality at his age, which must mean he trains really hard.

Maybe he will encourage Wazza to drop a few pounds? :lol:
 

Cerpin

Full Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
795
Location
Aalborg, Denmark
I was a lot more excited about this transfer before the Euros. Thought he was incredibly frustrating there. He's a lot like Berbatov in the sense that when things aren't working for him he just seems to be strolling around. With that being said, I still think he'd be a good signing -- but not a great one. If there are better options out there, I think we should look into them. Can't really think of any though.
 

prath92

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Messages
12,322
Location
India
I was a lot more excited about this transfer before the Euros. Thought he was incredibly frustrating there. He's a lot like Berbatov in the sense that when things aren't working for him he just seems to be strolling around. With that being said, I still think he'd be a good signing -- but not a great one. If there are better options out there, I think we should look into them. Can't really think of any though.
that's true for all world class players including Ronaldo Bale and all
 

The United

Full Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2015
Messages
5,804
A bit of off topic here.

His agent is by all means a cnut. All the 3 players making noises to involve with United are his this summer. It seems a bit weird to me. And he does not really have a good relationship with United.

The guy always makes noises about how his clients are interested in moving to bla bla after a couple of years at a club. Didn't Zlatan talk about how he and his agent 'trolled' about potential transfer to make Barca's president at that time 'upset'? Wasn't the agent the same guy? For all we know, he could be taking the piss with us.

Anyway, I am not sure if United really want to deal with someone like him even we have a new management now.

Also, people hanging on how Ancelotti had nice words for zlatan, well have we ever seen Carlos talked shit about anyone? That guy is the nicest you will ever seen in football world I think.
 
Last edited:

Bruno8

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
2,063
Location
By the Cliff
I wonder what his wages will be considering that when players hit their 30s we usually reduce their wages to around 80-90K per week with 1 year extensions. What more a 35yr old who is new to the PL??
 

charlenefan

Far less insightful than the other Charley
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
33,052
If nothing happens this week I'm going to start being concerned
 

Gazza

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2000
Messages
32,644
Location
'tis a silly place
I wonder what his wages will be considering that when players hit their 30s we usually reduce their wages to around 80-90K per week with 1 year extensions. What more a 35yr old who is new to the PL??
Wages are probably decided more in relation to a player's contribution or worth to a team, I don't think it's a strict rule about age. Age is a bigger factor in determining the length of the contract - supposedly we offered Ibra one year with a 2nd year option whereas he wants a straight 2 year deal.
 

Attila

Full Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
11,069
Location
RIP Mino
Supports
Trad Bricks
I wonder what his wages will be considering that when players hit their 30s we usually reduce their wages to around 80-90K per week with 1 year extensions. What more a 35yr old who is new to the PL??
Guardian says he wants £220k and wages are more to do with your value to the team not age
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,425
Location
Hollywood CA
I wonder what his wages will be considering that when players hit their 30s we usually reduce their wages to around 80-90K per week with 1 year extensions. What more a 35yr old who is new to the PL??
He's not just some player in his 30s. He's Zlatan.
 

Cheekiey

Full Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2015
Messages
1,506
Location
London
Which will be better for Ibra? PSG's or Uniteds setup?

P$G: (I know PSG don't play 4231)
Ibrahimovic
Cavani - Matuidi - Di Maria
United (potentially):
Ibrahimovic
Martial - James - Mkhitaryan
Whose front 4 is better? And better suited to Zlatan?
 

Leftback99

Might have a bedwetting fetish.
Joined
Jan 11, 2015
Messages
14,558
Which will be better for Ibra? PSG's or Uniteds setup?

P$G: (I know PSG don't play 4231)
Ibrahimovic
Cavani - Matuidi - Di Maria
United (potentially):
Ibrahimovic
Martial - James - Mkhitaryan
Whose front 4 is better? And better suited to Zlatan?
PSGs comfortably from those. We hopefully won't sign James.
 

Fraud

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 10, 2016
Messages
1,082
The first option looks more balanced, but the second has more quality.
 

DarkXaero

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2009
Messages
2,286
Location
NJ, USA
Which will be better for Ibra? PSG's or Uniteds setup?

P$G: (I know PSG don't play 4231)
Ibrahimovic
Cavani - Matuidi - Di Maria
United (potentially):
Ibrahimovic
Martial - James - Mkhitaryan
Whose front 4 is better? And better suited to Zlatan?
I like United better there. James is a much better no. 10 than Matuidi although Matuidi obviously provides great work rate and defensive ability. If we're going by the Mkhitaryan we saw in Bundesliga last season, then I'll give him the edge over Di Maria as he is more of a goal threat and his assists numbers were just as good in a stronger league (if not better). Cavani is a better player than Martial right now but he's not very comfortable on the wing and I like Martial a lot better there.
 

Reddevilboy

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 6, 2013
Messages
1,395
Location
Digital Nomad
Supports
Brexit
I'll be very concerned if reports are true that we are giving him £220k. He is already 34, turning 35 this year. We used to take the piss out of Chelsea during the early Roman era but what I respect about Chelsea now is that after they have laid out a foundation, they have a strict wage structure and they don't give out silly salaries like this.
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,049
Location
Moscow
Cavani is a better player than Martial right now but he's not very comfortable on the wing and I like Martial a lot better there.
Debatable (and it has less to do with me overrating Martial than with my evaluation of Cavani's level). Peak Cavani (for Napoli) was better, of course, but now I'm not so sure
 

ti vu

Full Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2015
Messages
12,799
Debatable (and it has less to do with me overrating Martial than with my evaluation of Cavani's level). Peak Cavani (for Napoli) was better, of course, but now I'm not so sure
Second this. Cavani may post better stat, then we must take into account of quality of PSG vs the majority of Ligue 1. Then notice that hardly anyone can catch a good game from Cavani!

Not saying Martial is already a top player ( I think he has a very long way). Here just want to say that the level of Cavani is not easily better as it may sound. Cavani is very strange player.
 

Carlsen19

Don't listen to my lies RE: Lineups
Joined
May 15, 2011
Messages
5,166
I'll be very concerned if reports are true that we are giving him £220k. He is already 34, turning 35 this year. We used to take the piss out of Chelsea during the early Roman era but what I respect about Chelsea now is that after they have laid out a foundation, they have a strict wage structure and they don't give out silly salaries like this.
It's only going to be for a year. It's nothing compared to what we've wasted/are continuing to waste on that fat lump Rooney.
 

Rado_N

Yaaas Broncos!
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
111,191
Location
Manchester
I'll be very concerned if reports are true that we are giving him £220k. He is already 34, turning 35 this year. We used to take the piss out of Chelsea during the early Roman era but what I respect about Chelsea now is that after they have laid out a foundation, they have a strict wage structure and they don't give out silly salaries like this.
What would your thoughts be if we were signing him for £7.5m and giving him a 2 year deal on ~£145k per week?
 

Striker10

"Ronaldo and trophies > Manchester United football
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
18,857
I'll be very concerned if reports are true that we are giving him £220k. He is already 34, turning 35 this year. We used to take the piss out of Chelsea during the early Roman era but what I respect about Chelsea now is that after they have laid out a foundation, they have a strict wage structure and they don't give out silly salaries like this.
You have to weigh everything up. Chelsea had to pay that to get the players in the first place. We are rebuilding and Zlatan (from the outside looking in), appears to be the best option. Forget his age - in some respects, that works in our favor with the kids we have coming through, but at the same time I'd rather a 34/35 Ibrahimovic then a 30 year old RVP because his movement is better and if we play the way we can, then he would have to be wearing clown boots to fail. His advice and experiences in the dressing room - and personality and confidence, will be a big boost.

So Zlatan might come on a big wage - but who else is? Are we offering that to everyone? No. We would only do it because we can handle it.
 

Sarni

nice guy, unassuming, objective United fan.
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Messages
57,917
Location
Krakow
I'll be very concerned if reports are true that we are giving him £220k. He is already 34, turning 35 this year. We used to take the piss out of Chelsea during the early Roman era but what I respect about Chelsea now is that after they have laid out a foundation, they have a strict wage structure and they don't give out silly salaries like this.
Why? He's a top player and very marketable. It's not like everyone else will ask for Zlatan level money.
 

Bruno8

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
2,063
Location
By the Cliff
Guardian says he wants £220k and wages are more to do with your value to the team not age
Still how do they you rate that "value to the team" especially when you consider legends like Giggs, Scholes, Keane, Vida, Rio, Evra etc never got even half of that
 

Attila

Full Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
11,069
Location
RIP Mino
Supports
Trad Bricks
Still how do they you rate that "value to the team" especially when you consider legends like Giggs, Scholes, Keane, Vida, Rio, Evra etc never got even half of that
Well that's a strange argument. You may not have realised but the money in football has increased quite a bit since Keane was playing. And I'm pretty sure Rio was on a £100k+

Did you miss the news about the PL's new TV deal?
 

Bruno8

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
2,063
Location
By the Cliff
Well that's a strange argument. You may not have realised but the money in football has increased quite a bit since Keane was playing. And I'm pretty sure Rio was on a £100k+

Did you miss the news about the PL's new TV deal?
Well maybe Keane is a bit far back but this has nothing to do with TV money otherwise Carrick who is arguably our best midfielder for that last few seasons is not getting half of that
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
23,010
Location
Somewhere out there
Well maybe Keane is a bit far back but this has nothing to do with TV money otherwise Carrick who is arguably our best midfielder for that last few seasons is not getting half of that
I'm pretty certain Carrick is on over 110k /week, or at least was before he just signed this extension.

And anyway, you can't compare the marketability of the two.
 

ti vu

Full Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2015
Messages
12,799
Well maybe Keane is a bit far back but this has nothing to do with TV money otherwise Carrick who is arguably our best midfielder for that last few seasons is not getting half of that
Not universally highly rated by the mass = less marketable value. Not demanded by other big teams, and not a signing that can significantly add chances of winning trophy. A senior figure at United, but not true leader material...

And Carrick was 100k+ before this new contract.
 

Attila

Full Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
11,069
Location
RIP Mino
Supports
Trad Bricks
Well maybe Keane is a bit far back but this has nothing to do with TV money otherwise Carrick who is arguably our best midfielder for that last few seasons is not getting half of that
Ibrahimovic is far better than Carrick and the club will be signing him expecting him to be one of our best players next season.

He's also one of the most marketable players in world football. Seriously how can you not see why Ibra will get £220k and why Carrick, a player who was poor for much of last season and not even a starter, doesn't
 

The red panther

princess transfer emo
Joined
Aug 8, 2015
Messages
2,855
A bit of off topic here.

His agent is by all means a cnut. All the 3 players making noises to involve with United are his this summer. It seems a bit weird to me. And he does not really have a good relationship with United.

The guy always makes noises about how his clients are interested in moving to bla bla after a couple of years at a club. Didn't Zlatan talk about how he and his agent 'trolled' about potential transfer to make Barca's president at that time 'upset'? Wasn't the agent the same guy? For all we know, he could be taking the piss with us.

Anyway, I am not sure if United really want to deal with someone like him even we have a new management now.

Also, people hanging on how Ancelotti had nice words for zlatan, well have we ever seen Carlos talked shit about anyone? That guy is the nicest you will ever seen in football world I think.
If you want the best players than you have to deal with cnut agents. If Fergie had been a bit more tactful and cooperative when it concerns dealing with cnut agents, Pogba would still be here instead of at Juve and we wouldn't need to be pay 120m for a player that came out of our own academy. Hazard would have been a United player aswell if he would have been a bit more modern about dealing with player agents and their enormous fees.

If you want to be successful as a club and you want to sign the best players than you deal with these agents and you pay them what you must to facilitate the moves that you require, even if the agents are gigantic cnuts.
 

prath92

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Messages
12,322
Location
India
For Sweden, Teams doubled up and tripled up on zlatan as they knew without him they would struggle to score (and they were right). And other players like berg and guidetti were poor to take advantage of the space

At United, if people doubled up on him, then it frees up some other player like martial or Rooney or mkhitariyan(if he signs). Last year similar happened to us with martial as we had no one to create stuff apart from him. So it will be more effective for zlatan and United.
 

CS@SG

New Member
Joined
May 12, 2015
Messages
1,290
If you want the best players than you have to deal with cnut agents. If Fergie had been a bit more tactful and cooperative when it concerns dealing with cnut agents, Pogba would still be here instead of at Juve and we wouldn't need to be pay 120m for a player that came out of our own academy. Hazard would have been a United player aswell if he would have been a bit more modern about dealing with player agents and their enormous fees.

If you want to be successful as a club and you want to sign the best players than you deal with these agents and you pay them what you must to facilitate the moves that you require, even if the agents are gigantic cnuts.
Barca do not have any Mendes' clients, and no Raiola's at the moment I think. Renato Sanchez is the 1st player under Mendes that BM signed, I think no Raiola's at the moment as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.