clarkydaz
Full Member
scholes of courseWho do we compare him to then?
scholes of courseWho do we compare him to then?
It's upto you fellas seeing as you want to compare him to someone. I mentioned though to the other poster about comparing him to exceptions, athletes who are above almost everyone. What would be the point in doing that, everyone looks poor compared to Ronaldo's physique and longevity. So who did the poster reply with??? Giggs. A winger who played till he was 38 at the top level and the highest appearance maker in the club's history.Who do we compare him to then?
What I was trying to say was that a normal person would be past their peak 30+.. Rooney was over the hill at 26, he's been poor for 4 years.There's nothing reckless about it. He had the reputation of being a notoriously poor trainer before he even reached his mid-20s. The club knew that he wouldn't be the type to work hard to maintain his fitness at the highest level. What's reckless is that he was still given a 5 year contract in his late 20's despite that.
Did Giggs really suffer more injuries? I struggle to believe that. People forget the amount of injuries Rooney stupidly played through/rushed back from, highlights being two world cups - the playing against Bayern alone seriously shortened his career, apparently he's never fully recovered from pulling that stunt, however heroic.
I'd say I'd hope he gets to 250 before January and off he goes, even if it means 6 months just to see if he find anything again, but given how unsuccessful they were at getting rid of Basty and how much Rooney is tied into Man Utds financial structure.....urgh
I remember reading he had to stop running at full speed, that was how he made it stop.Yeah, Giggsy being out cost us the 98 title hence the aquisition of Blomqvist.
He would typically be out twice per season for around 5-6 games each time (hamstrings) till around 28-29
Had his clutch replaced, from what I remember?I remember reading he had to stop running at full speed, that was how he made it stop.
This is why Pep wanted rid of Hart as far away as possible. You bench him then the press will pile up the pressure every time the new keeper has a bit of a feck up and no one is expected to put in sublime performances all the times.If this is how we are constantly going to be constantly judged when he isn't playing, then it's best to get rid.
His friends will constantly criticise when we don't play like Barcelona.
Ok stop it now.I can accept it but it's still not fair to compare him to incredible athletes like Giggs.
That's some good insight. Do you think some papers actually do cross those borders? Like making up quotes and "inside sources"?I interned at the sport's section of a big german yellow press paper, and while they do milk every quote or piece of info they get for maximum emotional impact and sensationalism, they never actually lied or made things up as far as I could tell. It's just the way this branch of the press works.
True, we've made him filthy rich.Maybe he needs to lose a few pounds?
The reason he DID sign Sheringham was checking out his parents and finding they were both slim and fit in their fifties. No fruit falls far from the tree, and Rooneys parents are a right pair of bloaters.His physical condition and general apoearance is shocking for a professional athlete just turned 30. If it wasn't for the fake hair and the facework, he'd look about 20 years older than his actual age. I think Fergie made reference somewhere to Rooney's father ageing badly and drew his conclusions about his son's longevity.
The reason he DID sign Sheringham was checking out his parents and finding they were both slim and fit in their fifties. No fruit falls far from the tree, and Rooneys parents are a right pair of bloaters.
You wouldn't get a fee for him. Unless it's China or maybe MLS.Apologies if it's already been asked but what would Rooney be worth in today's transfer market?
If United wanted to move him on, where would he end up and for how much?
I don't think Rooney was wearing a wig back then.Virtually indistinguishable other than one is wearing a wig.
Like zombies from the land of many pies.
I think the point that guy is trying to make is proved here, of all those 5 points only 2 of them can be "blamed" on Rooney,That's disingenuous, because you know there is a lot more behind the current predicament. Everyone here wants what is best for the club, which means we can't afford passengers. Also, consider the following:
1) His contract shenanigans
2) Hes been poor for a long time now, so it's not form, it's his current level, and it's simply not good enough
3) Not really his fault, but under Van Gaal he was undroppable, which was just infuriating
4) All the arse licking and pampering from pundits and media has causes a reaction in the fans. It's just ridiculous
5) Everyone reaches the end of their career at some point. Giggs and Scholes are also United legends, and they accepted a diminished role when they got older. Why should not the same apply for Rooney? Also, the two former never performed as badly as Rooney has done lately
I don't hate him, hes been a magnificent player for us, but we need to be realistic here. Hes done as a top player and both for the clubs sake and his own, he should not be a regular starter anymore
Again, there are people who like to get nasty but they are the clear majority here and it's disingenuous to frame any argument based on "hate" for Rooney. Most of the comments are based on love for United.It doesn't bother me any friend. I'm not 'precious' about Rooney, I don't personally know the man. He plays for the Club I've been a fan of for decades, so yes I will defend him as long as he does. He leaves, and I won't be following him other than with a curious interest. If he never steps on the pitch at OT again I won't shed a tear, believe me. And I've seen all things written about him here in the Cafe that aren't in any way related to his football abilities, name calling, etc. I just find that part of it silly.
True, we've made him filthy rich.
LOL.Send him to Dubai for a couple of weeks of intensive training/ weight loss.
I distinctly remember Giggs having hamstring problems well into his 20s but his average appearance over 24 years is still about 41+ games per season. Javier Zanetti, who if Wiki is to be believed started putting up 30+ appearances even in his debut season, played about 43+ games over 22 years.Did Giggs really suffer more injuries? I struggle to believe that. People forget the amount of injuries Rooney stupidly played through/rushed back from, highlights being two world cups - the playing against Bayern alone seriously shortened his career, apparently he's never fully recovered from pulling that stunt, however heroic.
I'd say I'd hope he gets to 250 before January and off he goes, even if it means 6 months just to see if he find anything again, but given how unsuccessful they were at getting rid of Basty and how much Rooney is tied into Man Utds financial structure.....urgh
I'd say most dislike him and criticise him because of the transfer drama. They criticise him even if he has a good game.Just saw his "assist" for Zlatan. Man, I thought it was a cross-shot like Di Maria to Falcao. Had no idea it was something like this
In an honesty, will remain one of my favorite players, great player in his prime. He had the skill, talent, aggression, everything.
Sadly, it's over now and he's being detrimental to the team. It doesn't make him a bad player, he's just not fit to play for us anymore.
I think most posters criticizing him are only doing so because they loved so much before and hate seeing him this way. Well, at least that's how I feel.
Nowhere have I claimed that. Show me a post of mine where I did.There is nothing incredible about seeing 30 year old athletes still being fit enough to play their respective sport at a reasonable level.
Fair enough, some of the bile being spewed is unfair, but this is football and there is a lot of emotion involved.That is fine, and you are bringing common sense to the table. I can see all the arguments you list as valid. But I said 'some'. And if you haven't seen anything as I describe then you aren't paying close attention, or never go on Twitter. Some of what I see, is borderline 'hate'. I'm not speaking of you or in particular anyone else, but it's out there by supposed fans of the Club.
Well as with everything, there are circumstances we can't control. Not saying everything is Rooneys fault, just that it has contributed to his increasingly bad reputation among the fanbase.I think the point that guy is trying to make is proved here, of all those 5 points only 2 of them can be "blamed" on Rooney,
(..)
It annoys me when players don't play well but I'm equal in my criticism of them, lingard has played shit so has fellaini so has Rooney, all need replacing a sap but that won't be until the summer.
all we can do is hope they do enough to get us to top 4
This is why Jose should have gone full 'Pep on Hart/Yaya' with this from the get go not this tip toeing and acting apologetically to a sub-par, overpaid, overweight media protected prima dona. Just come out with a 'you haven't been good enough and will not play again until you show the required intensity and level' put down. Rooney's mates are already targeting players like Mkhitaryen who haven't played in ages to defend their golden boy and it won't stop because Gary and his ilk care more about the nationality of United players than United's fortunes on the pitch.Neville seems to be distorting the issue here. If Rooney is not performing well in any of his 'favoured' positions, then he should go on the bench like any other player, for the good of the team. Trying to shift the focus elsewhere, especially when we don't play well, just sounds like an agenda. He full well knows ( or should), that it's impossible to play well all the time, and that a team needs to develop and evolve, especially after having such a big and negative influence for at least 2 seasons.
Why can't Neville give the other players and manager a chance? When Moyes was there he was all about giving him bloody time. So now Jose and our mostly foreign players don't deserve the same to at least have the chance to build something?
Honestly, Rooney is such a distraction - every time we lose or play shit - his media buddies are going to be all over the other players and Jose's ass. It's irritating to think we'll have this all season (sigh).
Easy to say but Joe Hart wasn't about to break the club's all time scorer record which has been held for the last 50 years by one of our biggest legends.This is why Jose should have gone full 'Pep on Hart/Yaya' with this from the get go not this tip toeing and acting apologetically to a sub-par, overpaid, overweight media protected prima dona. Just come out with a 'you haven't been good enough and will not play again until you show the required intensity and level' put down. Rooney's mates are already targeting players like Mkhitaryen who haven't played in ages to defend their golden boy and it won't stop because Gary and his ilk care more about the nationality of United players than United's fortunes on the pitch.
Of course a team will be more successful with better players but after Ronaldo left there was a definite changing of the guard that Rooney would take over as the focal point of the attack. He did a really good job for about 8 months. After that, there has never been another time when Rooney seemed good enough to be the leader of the attack in a successful United team.We lost the point of our attack in ronaldo, moved rooney to striker we but didnt fill the void left by Ronaldo, we were still close 2nd in the league only on goal difference and also got to a champions league final we were very competitive (also Dave's first year between the sticks cost us some points). Unfortunately during his times as our main striking threat we didnt replace ronaldo and it was coming to an end of an era with giggs scholes getting older and our hopes being pinned on Tom Cleverley Anderson and Nani coming good.
I dont think Rooney being the "Talisman" has anything to do with our drop during those years its more the midfield standard dropped and we became slow in our tempo.
Its obvious to me that a team is going to more successful when it was a number of talisman as opposed to just one
I can understand Rooney's frustration too. He whined about United not signing good enough players but then didn't like it when they signed a better one in his position. It showed up his own deficiencies and he wasn't able to blame everyone else. That season, Van Persie did what Rooney has never been able to do in his career. Score enough goals to fire his team to the title.Agreed,never really thought about it but I can understand Rooney's frustration at the end of fergies last season, when Ronnie left Rooney was asked to be the main man and to be fair he delivered, i think we were all screaming for a new midfield at the time and instead of that we brought in RVP.
As a fan that is great we won the league and stole arsenals main man, although it was so obviously a stop gap to get Fergie a title from city so he could go out on top (again rightly so) but if I'm Rooney i'd be thinking hang on I step up I take on the goal scoring job and try to continue overall workrate and instead of improving the midfield you buy a striker, make me second fiddle and put me back in my old role, then drop me for players like welbeck in a real madrid game. That would rightly peeve me off, now football isn't about keeping anyone happy and Rooney in an ideal world should of just knuckled down and proved everyone wrong (although for me under moyes he performed maybe the best out of the whole squad) but I would certainly be thinking if I was Rooney and if this is how fergie is going to treat me then I might just head off to pastures new.
But that changing of guard put Rooney as the main man but who was replacing rooneys role? We took 40 goals out the team and didn't replace them.Of course a team will be more successful with better players but after Ronaldo left there was a definite changing of the guard that Rooney would take over as the focal point of the attack. He did a really good job for about 8 months. After that, there has never been another time when Rooney seemed good enough to be the leader of the attack in a successful United team.
I completely disagree with your first sentence. Rooney already was the striker when Ronaldo was at the club. They just changed the style of play by replacing Ronaldo with more functional team players to feed Rooney rather than players of more individual brilliance. It worked quite well initially.
I can understand Rooney's frustration too. He whined about United not signing good enough players but then didn't like it when they signed a better one in his position. It showed up his own deficiencies and he wasn't able to blame everyone else. That season, Van Persie did what Rooney has never been able to do in his career. Score enough goals to fire his team to the title.
You say that Rooney delivered as the main man. He didn't. You say his best position is the number 9 and goalscorer yet he has never fired his team to a title from that position. Van Persie and even Berbatov did in the same team he said wasn't good enough.
I cannot understand this level of biasness and entitlement. We signed a striker, in RVP, who was better than Rooney, so what if he is peeved or frustrated. Its not about him, Rooney, its about what's best for the team. So we should have bought midfielders to make Rooney feel better? He is a lucky man because after we got RVP we should have gotten rid of Rooney and with that money bought some midfielders to complement RVP.Of course a team will be more successful with better players but after Ronaldo left there was a definite changing of the guard that Rooney would take over as the focal point of the attack. He did a really good job for about 8 months. After that, there has never been another time when Rooney seemed good enough to be the leader of the attack in a successful United team.
I completely disagree with your first sentence. Rooney already was the striker when Ronaldo was at the club. They just changed the style of play by replacing Ronaldo with more functional team players to feed Rooney rather than players of more individual brilliance. It worked quite well initially.
I can understand Rooney's frustration too. He whined about United not signing good enough players but then didn't like it when they signed a better one in his position. It showed up his own deficiencies and he wasn't able to blame everyone else. That season, Van Persie did what Rooney has never been able to do in his career. Score enough goals to fire his team to the title.
You say that Rooney delivered as the main man. He didn't. You say his best position is the number 9 and goalscorer yet he has never fired his team to a title from that position. Van Persie and even Berbatov did in the same team he said wasn't good enough.
You have totally misread what that guy is saying if you read my initial post that he was replying to you'd understand.I cannot understand this level of biasness and entitlement. We signed a striker, in RVP, who was better than Rooney, so what if he is peeved or frustrated. Its not about him, Rooney, its about what's best for the team. So we should have bought midfielders to make Rooney feel better? He is a lucky man because after we got RVP we should have gotten rid of Rooney and with that money bought some midfielders to complement RVP.
Great stuff from our captain there.
Actually I was agreeing with him and critical of your post.You have totally misread what that guy is saying if you read my initial post that he was replying to you'd understand.
You're seeing it from a fans point of view, we should of signed midfielders to become a better team not to keep Rooney happy.