Well this is about as clear as it gets that he didn't touch the ball, even if he did (he didn't) his arm was the closest thing to getting a touch.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Well this is about as clear as it gets that he didn't touch the ball, even if he did (he didn't) his arm was the closest thing to getting a touch.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Crystal clear- no touch. And if he had I think he was offside...Well this is about as clear as it gets that he didn't touch the ball, even if he did (he didn't) his arm was the closest thing to getting a touch.
He deserves to be mocked. And it's his fault that things escalated to this point. No one else's. When you go to such lengths over such a trivial issue getting your club to appeal and even swear on your daughters life you shouldn't be surprised at the backlash from people. And I don't buy into Poch's excuse that he wasn't involved. I'm pretty sure he approved of the clubs decision to appeal.It's rare you get almost the whole football community united but everyone seems to have come together over this to laugh and mock Harry Kane.
LOL yes. I remember that.Exactly. Same way they shared the corrected image from the Mata VAR controversy.
The resident Spurs fans are doing their best to find reason behind his madness (one took a a ban for his troubles) but that's to be expected I guess.It's rare you get almost the whole football community united but everyone seems to have come together over this to laugh and mock Harry Kane.
If Spurs had just gone about this quietly then it wouldn't be a big deal. It's his pure desperation that makes him look like a twat, swearing on his daughter's life and tweeting Gary Linekar, all just to take a goal away from his teammate.I can't believe the reaction this has got from you lot.
He's a striker, he felt he got a touch and it was his goal. He felt the goal was incorrectly awarded to Eriksen and he wanted it to be his goal. To most players it doesn't matter but when you are chasing three successive golden boots of course he's going to be bothered about it.
Kane has done the right thing. That goal could be the difference, and you can tell by Kanes reaction straight after the goal that he felt he got the touch and it's his goal.
Nothing else to see here. The FA have seen sense and Eriksen was happy to take the assist. Job done.
You coped with a team containing John Terry, I'm sure you'll be fine. 'Likable' has never exactly been the forte of England stars.If Spurs had just gone about this quietly then it wouldn't be a big deal. It's his pure desperation that makes him look like a twat, swearing on his daughter's life and tweeting Gary Linekar, all just to take a goal away from his teammate.
How are we meant to support England with this cnut leading the line.
Poor babyTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Not even Juan has sent him a /hug.Poor baby
Kane is probably the least controversial star England had in years. He is much better than Rooney, Gerrard, Terry, Cole and others off the field.If Spurs had just gone about this quietly then it wouldn't be a big deal. It's his pure desperation that makes him look like a twat, swearing on his daughter's life and tweeting Gary Linekar, all just to take a goal away from his teammate.
How are we meant to support England with this cnut leading the line.
Poor, just poor. My respect for both Kane and Poch has gone down.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Damn, he hugs everybody as well.Not even Juan has sent him a /hug.
Harry must be the loneliest guy in the world right now.
Nothing a little bit of diving by him against City won't fix
He deserves stick and possibly shouldn't be England captain this summer but it'll blow over. Some very celebrated footballers have done scummy things much worse than this.Be interesting to see what reaction he gets from fans on the pitch - booing him, etc. Obviously the whole thing isn't that serious, he just comes out looking a bit pathetic really. Spurs fans will obviously just double down on their love for him, which is understandable, but everyone else is going to be mocking him for some time i think. I got the feeling that most people liked Harry, or at least were apathetic towards him, but i that may change slightly. And to be honest, he probably deserves some mocking for this whole affair; it's all a bit tragic from old Harry.
I bet Errikksson was hurt by all the trouble but Kane claimed that tooTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Actually, I've been laughing at Kane and he deserves the stick no matter what for going such lengths over trivial thing but looking at this reply here ball quite clearly changes the trajectory most likely after have slightest of connections with his shoulder - ball accelerates for a split of the second.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Why are you making such a big deal out of his name? it's EriksenI bet Errikksson was hurt by all the trouble but Kane claimed that too
I really don't know what you're seeing mate, to me that clip makes it clear he didn't touch it.Actually, I've been laughing at Kane and he deserves the stick no matter what for going such lengths over trivial thing but looking at this reply here ball quite clearly changes the trajectory most likely after have slightest of connections with his shoulder - ball accelerates for a split of the second.
You must have the eyes of a hawk because I'm not seeing any such deviation in speed or trajectory.Actually, I've been laughing at Kane and he deserves the stick no matter what for going such lengths over trivial thing but looking at this reply here ball quite clearly changes the trajectory most likely after have slightest of connections with his shoulder - ball accelerates for a split of the second.
Misspelling his name became a running gag (hopefully) localised to this thread after someone complained that he couldn't believe people found it hard to spell Eriksen.Why are you making such a big deal out of his name? it's Eriksen
Good lad Eriksen. Kane
Blimey. Didn’t even look close to his shoulder.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Because he can give an account of events, which is "evidence" as I mentioned.How would Harry Kane be a witness?
Ah I see, must have missed it thenMisspelling his name became a running gag (hopefully) localised to this thread after someone complained that he couldn't believe people found it hard to spell Eriksen.
Yeah.... This!what a twat
So can a murderer in a murder trial. Doesn’t make them a witness. If the flag had gone up for offside and he’d went over to the linesman and said he didn’t touch it would that be evidence?Because he can give an account of events, which is "evidence" as I mentioned.