kentafuji
Full Member
Be even better when Salah wins golden boot and this ends up being for nothing
What he 'feels' is irrelevant. He didn't touch it.I can't believe the reaction this has got from you lot.
He's a striker, he felt he got a touch and it was his goal. He felt the goal was incorrectly awarded to Eriksen and he wanted it to be his goal. To most players it doesn't matter but when you are chasing three successive golden boots of course he's going to be bothered about it.
Kane has done the right thing. That goal could be the difference, and you can tell by Kanes reaction straight after the goal that he felt he got the touch and it's his goal.
Nothing else to see here. The FA have seen sense and Eriksen was happy to take the assist. Job done.
Err...are you trolling?I can't believe the reaction this has got from you lot.
He's a striker, he felt he got a touch and it was his goal. He felt the goal was incorrectly awarded to Eriksen and he wanted it to be his goal. To most players it doesn't matter but when you are chasing three successive golden boots of course he's going to be bothered about it.
Kane has done the right thing. That goal could be the difference, and you can tell by Kanes reaction straight after the goal that he felt he got the touch and it's his goal.
Nothing else to see here. The FA have seen sense and Eriksen was happy to take the assist. Job done.
His account of touching the ball is witness evidence... stop using legal terms you do not understand.So they gave him the goal even though there was no clear evidence he got the final touch?
The FA have set themselves a dangerous precedent here. Talk about digging your own hole.
Nah feck that. The only reason I’m on board with this is because it’s winding up the scousers.Like others have said, I actually hope salah wins it now
He’s obsessed with himself, that’s what he is. Caring more about himself than the team and even stealing a team mate’s goal just increase his own market value. Bet he sleeps with his own face printed on his pillowcase, too.I can't believe the reaction this has got from you lot.
He's a striker, he felt he got a touch and it was his goal. He felt the goal was incorrectly awarded to Eriksen and he wanted it to be his goal. To most players it doesn't matter but when you are chasing three successive golden boots of course he's going to be bothered about it.
Kane has done the right thing. That goal could be the difference, and you can tell by Kanes reaction straight after the goal that he felt he got the touch and it's his goal.
Nothing else to see here. The FA have seen sense and Eriksen was happy to take the assist. Job done.
How do you know he didn't touch it. Replays are inconclusive so the only person who know is Kane.What he 'feels' is irrelevant. He didn't touch it.
He's not "done the right thing" at all, because anyone with any semblance of sense and shame would see the replays and realise they hadn't touched it at all and that would be the end of it. Instead he swore on his daughters life that he touched it and got his club to appeal to give him the goal like a bratty child.
The FA awarding him a goal he didn't score is also not "seeing sense", it's straight up ridiculousness on every level.
Kane is the biggest team player around. He's all about the collective but he's also a hungry goal scorer.He’s obsessed with himself, that’s what he is. Caring more about himself than the team and even stealing a team mate’s goal just increase his own market value. Bet he sleeps with his own face printed on his pillowcase, too.
If replays are inconclusive then he shouldn't get it.How do you know he didn't touch it. Replays are inconclusive so the only person who know is Kane.
Why do you even care? Spurs still scored and whether it was Kane or Eriksen it doesn't matter.
Why do you care what reaction this incident has got on caf?Why do you even care?
Looking at your post history you’re a spurs fan, right? If it was an arsenal player who did what Kane is doing and arsenal as a club backed it, I can guarantee you and all the other spurs fans defending this would be laughing and taking the piss out of how small time they areHow do you know he didn't touch it. Replays are inconclusive so the only person who know is Kane.
Why do you even care? Spurs still scored and whether it was Kane or Eriksen it doesn't matter.
Okay Judge Judy, you know best.His account of touching the ball is witness evidence... stop using legal terms you do not understand.
The replays make it pretty clear actually, but even if we were to accept your position that they're inconclusive it shouldn't have been changed.How do you know he didn't touch it. Replays are inconclusive so the only person who know is Kane.
Why do you even care? Spurs still scored and whether it was Kane or Eriksen it doesn't matter.
I hope he wins the golden boot by one goal lolHonestly think there will be a backlash against Kane for this when he comes to opposition from now on. Disgrace he's claimed it, appealed it and swore on his daughter's life. He'll regret it in my opinion.
Kanes wants as many goals to his name as humanly possible for when United/Real/Bayern come calling in the summer. More goals means a stronger bargaining chip when negotiating his contract.Kane is the biggest team player around. He's all about the collective but he's also a hungry goal scorer.
He's looked up to by all his teammates because he's such a team player. He didn't steal a goal from his teammates. Eriksen said in the post match interview he felt it was Kane's goal. Honestly grow up.
Are you suggesting that the account of a witness is not evidence?Okay Judge Judy, you know best.
No but I would suggest that the evidence put forward by Kane is inconclusive at best. As are any and all videos of the incident.Are you suggesting that the account of a witness is not evidence?
Aye, be nice for a spurs player to win a trophy.I hope he wins the golden boot by one goal lol
Wouldn't it!Aye, be nice for a spurs player to win a trophy.
At best it would be his shirt that got the slightest touch but not really. The ball absolutely does not change its trajectory which means it's not his goal anyway. Hilariously small time from Kane and Spurs.I 1000% think he gets a touch on this. The ball looks to change trajectory and I can't see him going to the lengths he has if he didn't.
To focus on winning the golden boot (individual award) and even claiming a possible deflection goal afterwards, is not my definition of a team player. Yes, forwards should be hungry for goals, but that is to win the match, not for winning private trophies. And of course Eriksen would say that, what'd you expect?Kane is the biggest team player around. He's all about the collective but he's also a hungry goal scorer.
He's looked up to by all his teammates because he's such a team player. He didn't steal a goal from his teammates. Eriksen said in the post match interview he felt it was Kane's goal. Honestly grow up.
Precisely. Says a lot about them for even pursing this. What a bunch of jokers. Hope we destroy them in the FA Cup semifinal even more now. #JusticeFor[Salah/Eriksen/Common Decency!]At best it would be his shirt that got the slightest touch but not really. The ball absolutely does not change its trajectory which means it's not his goal anyway. Hilariously small time from Kane and Spurs.
of course you would. and if it were lukaku vs aguaro for the same title and a ball hit luks arm hair I'd be backing him too, but we all know it was never kane's goal. saw the replay for the first time today and honestly a bit annoyed he's trying to claim it.I hope he wins the golden boot by one goal lol
How would Harry Kane be a witness?Are you suggesting that the account of a witness is not evidence?
Lukaku winning the golden bootof course you would. and if it were lukaku vs aguaro for the same title and a ball hit luks arm hair I'd be backing him too, but we all know it was never kane's goal. saw the replay for the first time today and honestly a bit annoyed he's trying to claim it.
I call ROFLOLCOPTER to the witness standOkay Judge Judy, you know best.
Eric-San ffsEric-San is an honourable man. He will give up the goal to the golden boy with pleasure and glee.
Can you post the footage which shows this please? From the angles I watched there was no change.I 1000% think he gets a touch on this. The ball looks to change trajectory and I can't see him going to the lengths he has if he didn't.
Account of a witness ffsAre you suggesting that the account of a witness is not evidence?