The FA can't be serious if he really got the goal. I've seen every replay angle of that goal and still can't understand how he thinks it's his goal.
Sky: Spurs appeal to FA to award the second goal against Stoke City to Harry Kane | Spurs win appeal
- Thread starter prath92
- Start date
If I was Eriksen I would be petty as hell in the next game, I seriously wouldn't pass him the ball.
"BREAKING: Liverpool forward Mohamed Salah wins @premierleague player of the month for March. Salah is the first player to win the award three times in the same season. #SSN"
Congratulations to Harry Kane
I still have no idea.
That'd make Eriksen look like a bigger tit than Kane for claiming the goal in the first place.
You really think so eh? How many times does Hazard kicking ball boy get brought up? When was the last mention of Suarez's biting? Is Suarez still thought of a as a racist? I'm afraid this will get forgotten about very soon. Time is the healer/diluter in all manner of things and certainly something as trivial as this.
Last edited by a moderator:
It's ludicrous. The FA can't be going around overruling decisions based solely on a player's say-so, when all evidence fails to back up the claim.
Quite so. It's amazing to behold 12 pages and counting devoted to the subject.
Spitting at a player - or getting caught in secret doping - is one thing. But a striker claiming to have gotten the last touch on a goal-scoring ball - and winning the appeal concerning this - is hardly reputation-destroying stuff.
It'll all be blown away like cherry blossoms in Spring the instant Kane scores his next brace or hat-trick.
If you listen really closely with TV volume turned to max, you can actually hear Kane's hair brush the ball.
Perhaps you should spend more time reading the CAF than posting. Every L'pool controversial incident now doesn't feel complete without "Bring out the T-shirt" joke. Every here and then people mock L'pool about it's not something beyond them since they support racism after all...
Hazard was cued more with down tool, and the term was abused than the ball boy kicking incident. Search down tool term on here, and see how many times it being associated with Chelsea and Hazard
Last edited:
Quite messed up how the FA can rewrite the history books and give a goal to someone who didn’t touch it, in this day and age. You know if it was Lamela or someone they wouldn’t have given it to him.
Apparently Spurs have claimed Kane scored this goal. FA to decide.
A defendant isn't a compellable witness but yes they can give witness evidence if they elect to.
Despite the title, he didn't actually appeal to the FA. They had nothing to do with the decision. Even the tweet says the appeal was to the Premier League so don't know why prath92 put FA in the title.
Everyone should mock prath92 who tried to get a decision by PL committee credited to FA, even though all replays suggest it was the PL committee who did it all along
Perhaps Kane claimed that he appealed to the FA, even though he didn't?
This thread is getting confusing.
Its not my best work, but hurray for Scotch!
Was at that game, miss of the century surely.That's amazing!
What they say isn’t evidence. What about the question I asked?
If Harry Kane wins the golden boot, who would bet against John Terry being up there in a Chelsea shirt celebrating with him?
Swearing on his daughters life ....what an arsehole.
It's not like he is actually putting her life in danger, he is just emphasizing how certain he is that he got a touch on the ball, I fail to see why this is an issue really.
Spurs to appeal to the FA to stop people taking the piss out of Kane, Spurs and the FA. Is there a sadder bunch of bastards?
Because he is a cnut for saying it. That's why.
Come on, people don't claim things on their childrens lives, especially on such a public platform, so trivially. It's really weird. It's tantamount to publicly claiming that getting the credit for a random goal is as important to you as your childs life.
It's not even as if it changes the result, or rights some serious wrong, it's simply so Kane gets a slightly bigger number in his end of year stats and a few exta quid in pocket.
That's not even getting into that the replays show that either he didn't even touch the ball, or got so minor a glance on it that it didn't in the slightest influence whether that goal would have been scored or not
This is why I think it's silly, not that I care too much. The swear part is probably just something he said because he was 100% sure he touched it. Don't think this entire ordeal paints him in a great light, but I've seen worse things in football so I don't care too much either way.
Would own goals count for him? He could score a few of those to boost his numbers.
Have you ever heard the phrase "Tempting Fate?"
Thats whats wrong, any good parent, anywhere in the world, would never risk such an uncertain thing with their own flesh and blood. Ever.
To even label it a miss is a massive understatement. You witnessed a work of art!Was at that game, miss of the century surely.
The events of this past week have clearly take it's toll on young Harry. Looks like he's aged 20 years in that clip.
And where did he get that second chin from?
This will never blow over. This petty behaviour will stain Kane for the rest of his life in the same way Lineker was stained (pun intended
) by the shat-gate "scandal".
Last edited by a moderator:
Real Ministry of Truth behaviour from the PL. Doubleplusgood!
This is such a weird thing for people on here to care so much about. He's a striker, he's somehow certain he got a touch on it, it would help him for the golden boot. I just don't see much wrong here. I don't think it speaks volumes of his character as some suggest nor do I think this is going to damage the partnership with Eriksen.
You might argue it's a bit over the top for him to want this goal so badly, but it's that same desire for goals that makes him such a deadly player on the pitch.
You might argue it's a bit over the top for him to want this goal so badly, but it's that same desire for goals that makes him such a deadly player on the pitch.
This will never blow over. This petty behaviour will stain Kane for the rest of his life in the same way Lineker was stained (pun intended
Oh come on..... seriously?