Prodigy24
Full Member
The FA can't be serious if he really got the goal. I've seen every replay angle of that goal and still can't understand how he thinks it's his goal.
"BREAKING: Liverpool forward Mohamed Salah wins @premierleague player of the month for March. Salah is the first player to win the award three times in the same season. #SSN"
Congratulations to Harry Kane
That'd make Eriksen look like a bigger tit than Kane for claiming the goal in the first place.If I was Eriksen I would be petty as hell in the next game, I seriously wouldn't pass him the ball.
This has really put a dent in the way people will be looking at Harry in the future, he has really made himself the laughing stock of football with going to the FA to claim Eriksen's goal. If everyone all over the world have to watch several slow motion reruns to see if there was any contact, then there was too little contact to claim it as your goal, plain and simple, the wind of the ball flapping your sleeve doesn't mean there was contact.
It is really pathetic that the FA go along with this ruling, are they too so desperate to give Harry the golden boot again, just now they will think up some rule to deduct goals from Salah.
You really think so eh? How many times does Hazard kicking ball boy get brought up? When was the last mention of Suarez's biting? Is Suarez still thought of a as a racist? I'm afraid this will get forgotten about very soon. Time is the healer/diluter in all manner of things and certainly something as trivial as this.This has really put a dent in the way people will be looking at Harry in the future, he has really made himself the laughing stock of football with going to the FA to claim Eriksen's goal. If everyone all over the world have to watch several slow motion reruns to see if there was any contact, then there was too little contact to claim it as your goal, plain and simple, the wind of the ball flapping your sleeve doesn't mean there was contact.
It is really pathetic that the FA go along with this ruling, are they too so desperate to give Harry the golden boot again, just now they will think up some rule to deduct goals from Salah.
It's ludicrous. The FA can't be going around overruling decisions based solely on a player's say-so, when all evidence fails to back up the claim.The FA can't be serious if he really got the goal. I've seen every replay angle of that goal and still can't understand how he thinks it's his goal.
Quite so. It's amazing to behold 12 pages and counting devoted to the subject.You really think so eh? How many times does Hazard kicking ball boy get brought up? When was the last mention of Suarez's biting? Is Suarez still thought of a as a racist? I'm afraid this will get forgotten about very soon. Time is the healer/diluter in all manner of things and certainly something as trivial as this.
If you listen really closely with TV volume turned to max, you can actually hear Kane's hair brush the ball.It's ludicrous. The FA can't be going around overruling decisions based solely on a player's say-so, when all evidence fails to back up the claim.
Perhaps you should spend more time reading the CAF than posting. Every L'pool controversial incident now doesn't feel complete without "Bring out the T-shirt" joke. Every here and then people mock L'pool about it's not something beyond them since they support racism after all...You really think so eh? How many times does Hazard kicking ball boy get brought up? When was the last mention of Suarez's biting? Is Suarez still thought of a as a racist? I'm afraid this will get forgotten about very soon. Time is the healer/diluter in all manner of things and certainly something as trivial as this.
I'll forgive him spring 2019 when he scores his first hat-trick for RMIt'll all be blown away like cherry blossoms in Spring the instant Kane scores his next brace or hat-trick.
It's rare you get almost the whole football community united but everyone seems to have come together over this to laugh and mock Harry Kane.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
A defendant isn't a compellable witness but yes they can give witness evidence if they elect to.So can a murderer in a murder trial. Doesn’t make them a witness. If the flag had gone up for offside and he’d went over to the linesman and said he didn’t touch it would that be evidence?
The FA can't be serious if he really got the goal. I've seen every replay angle of that goal and still can't understand how he thinks it's his goal.
It's ludicrous. The FA can't be going around overruling decisions based solely on a player's say-so, when all evidence fails to back up the claim.
Despite the title, he didn't actually appeal to the FA. They had nothing to do with the decision. Even the tweet says the appeal was to the Premier League so don't know why prath92 put FA in the title.Quite messed up how the FA can rewrite the history books and give a goal to someone who didn’t touch it, in this day and age. You know if it was Lamela or someone they wouldn’t have given it to him.
Everyone should mock prath92 who tried to get a decision by PL committee credited to FA, even though all replays suggest it was the PL committee who did it all alongDespite the title, he didn't actually appeal to the FA. They had nothing to do with the decision. Even the tweet says the appeal was to the Premier League so don't know why prath92 put FA in the title.
Perhaps Kane claimed that he appealed to the FA, even though he didn't?Despite the title, he didn't actually appeal to the FA. They had nothing to do with the decision. Even the tweet says the appeal was to the Premier League so don't know why prath92 put FA in the title.
That's amazing!
Apparently Spurs have claimed Kane scored this goal. FA to decide.
Was at that game, miss of the century surely.That's amazing!
What they say isn’t evidence. What about the question I asked?A defendant isn't a compellable witness but yes they can give witness evidence if they elect to.
It's not like he is actually putting her life in danger, he is just emphasizing how certain he is that he got a touch on the ball, I fail to see why this is an issue really.Swearing on his daughters life ....what an arsehole.
Because he is a cnut for saying it. That's why.It's not like he is actually putting her life in danger, he is just emphasizing how certain he is that he got a touch on the ball, I fail to see why this is an issue really.
Come on, people don't claim things on their childrens lives, especially on such a public platform, so trivially. It's really weird. It's tantamount to publicly claiming that getting the credit for a random goal is as important to you as your childs life.It's not like he is actually putting her life in danger, he is just emphasizing how certain he is that he got a touch on the ball, I fail to see why this is an issue really.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Because he is a cnut for saying it. That's why.
This is why I think it's silly, not that I care too much. The swear part is probably just something he said because he was 100% sure he touched it. Don't think this entire ordeal paints him in a great light, but I've seen worse things in football so I don't care too much either way.Come on, people don't claim things on their childrens lives, especially on such a public platform, so trivially. It's really weird. It's tantamount to publicly claiming that getting the credit for a random goal is as important to you as your childs life.
It's not even as if it changes the result, or rights some serious wrong, it's simply so Kane gets a slightly bigger number in his end of year stats and a few exta quid in pocket.
That's not even getting into that the replays show that either he didn't even touch the ball, or got so minor a glance on it that it didn't in the slightest influence whether that goal would have been scored or not
Have you ever heard the phrase "Tempting Fate?"It's not like he is actually putting her life in danger, he is just emphasizing how certain he is that he got a touch on the ball, I fail to see why this is an issue really.
To even label it a miss is a massive understatement. You witnessed a work of art!Was at that game, miss of the century surely.
The events of this past week have clearly take it's toll on young Harry. Looks like he's aged 20 years in that clip.
This will never blow over. This petty behaviour will stain Kane for the rest of his life in the same way Lineker was stained (pun intended ) by the shat-gate "scandal".You really think so eh? How many times does Hazard kicking ball boy get brought up? When was the last mention of Suarez's biting? Is Suarez still thought of a as a racist? I'm afraid this will get forgotten about very soon. Time is the healer/diluter in all manner of things and certainly something as trivial as this.
Oh come on..... seriously?This will never blow over. This petty behaviour will stain Kane for the rest of his life in the same way Lineker was stained (pun intended ) by the shat-gate "scandal".