Spurs new stadium | Loses NFL for 2020 but gains appearance in Gangs of London £££

GlastonSpur

Also disliked on an Aston Villa forum
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
17,716
Supports
Spurs
Took all of about 2 minutes to find. You were happy to talk about how big a problem debt was back then. Now it’s not an issue. There was plenty more predicting fire sales of United players too. Now it’s laughable to suggest Spurs may have issues. Like I said, you’re a parody.
Lol … if you say so. In contrast, I couldn't care less what you have said or haven't said in posts dating from years ago.

Happy trawling ...
 

GlastonSpur

Also disliked on an Aston Villa forum
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
17,716
Supports
Spurs
Ill be honest Glaston, your financial reports thus far, and general positivity throughout the building process, have been so wide of the mark that Im going to assume it'll reach 600m since you're saying otherwise.
I'll make a prediction, I think Spurs will borrow even more on top of this. Especially if you fail to reach the top 4.
"My" financial reports are actually the club's financial reports. If these are "so wide of the mark", then I suggest you report the club to the financial authorities for false accounting. Good luck with that.
 

acnumber9

Full Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2006
Messages
22,313
Lol … if you say so. In contrast, I couldn't care less what you have said or haven't said in posts dating from years ago.

Happy trawling ...
It’s easy to search debt and your user name. It’s also remarkably easy to point out your hypocrisy’s. 10 years ago you were predicting Utd would have to sell players to fund an ever increasing debt. Meanwhile Spurs debt continues to grow and it’s nothing to worry about.
 

GlastonSpur

Also disliked on an Aston Villa forum
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
17,716
Supports
Spurs
It’s easy to search debt and your user name. It’s also remarkably easy to point out your hypocrisy’s. 10 years ago you were predicting Utd would have to sell players to fund an ever increasing debt. Meanwhile Spurs debt continues to grow and it’s nothing to worry about.
So I failed to predict from years ago that United wouldn't have to sell players. I also failed to predict that United would decline into a mid-table team.

Predictions can be tricky, don't you think?
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
"My" financial reports are actually the club's financial reports. If these are "so wide of the mark", then I suggest you report the club to the financial authorities for false accounting. Good luck with that.
But you use the numbers in posts telling us how you could easily deal with x and y while in reality you fail to sign anybody during the summer and need to MUFC style refinance your debt which now seem to be linked.
That's nothing to do with official reports. Thats you. Buddy.
 

acnumber9

Full Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2006
Messages
22,313
So I failed to predict from years ago that United wouldn't have to sell players. I also failed to predict that United would decline into a mid-table team.

Predictions can be tricky, don't you think?
That mid table team has won more in two years than Spurs have in 25. They’re also not sitting bottom of their Champions League group.

Apparently so. When did you first say this stadium would open?
 

SquishyMcSquish

New Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2018
Messages
8,198
Supports
Tottenham
So I failed to predict from years ago that United wouldn't have to sell players. I also failed to predict that United would decline into a mid-table team.

Predictions can be tricky, don't you think?
Let's not be hasty. They're a colossal 4 points ahead of us and finished 2nd last season .. I don't think you can brand a team mid table at this point. Otherwise Bournemouth are top 4 challengers.
 

Johan07

Full Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2017
Messages
1,936
Ill be honest Glaston, your financial reports thus far, and general positivity throughout the building process, have been so wide of the mark that Im going to assume it'll reach 600m since you're saying otherwise.
I'll make a prediction, I think Spurs will borrow even more on top of this. Especially if you fail to reach the top 4.
If I would make a prediction I would agree with you and add that I think Spurs will have new owners within say two years. It is for me pretty obvious that Levy has been preparing the club for a takeover for a couple of years now. When the new stadium is done and the dust is settled the club is ripe for a takeover. The interesting part will be who buys it and if its a leveraged takeover as the one we know very well; or if it will be the Chinese or some oilmegalomaniac/state who can clear the debt at once.
Saudi Spurs anyone? How is that for a name, and its well within the realm of possibility.
OK, not the name change maybe but what I am suggesting....
 

balaks

Full Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
15,335
Location
Northern Ireland
Supports
Tottenham Hotspur
If I would make a prediction I would agree with you and add that I think Spurs will have new owners within say two years. It is for me pretty obvious that Levy has been preparing the club for a takeover for a couple of years now. When the new stadium is done and the dust is settled the club is ripe for a takeover. The interesting part will be who buys it and if its a leveraged takeover as the one we know very well; or if it will be the Chinese or some oilmegalomaniac/state who can clear the debt at once.
Saudi Spurs anyone? How is that for a name, and its well within the realm of possibility.
OK, not the name change maybe but what I am suggesting....
I think you could be right.
 

Ban

New Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2015
Messages
26,022
Location
Zagreb, HR
Love how Glaston turns every conversation to United. While their colossal stadium is still not built.
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,888
When did debt become not a bad thing? When Spurs have it obviously. You’re a parody.

Clicked on few posts and read conversation from 10 years back. Hats off to Spurs on building the stadium without racking up crippling debts :lol:
 
Last edited:

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,833
So I failed to predict from years ago that United wouldn't have to sell players. I also failed to predict that United would decline into a mid-table team.

Predictions can be tricky, don't you think?
And yet you are always unshakably confident in yours, to the point of presenting them as inescapable facts.
 

Dolf

Full Member
Joined
May 27, 2016
Messages
2,896
Location
Amsterdam
So I failed to predict from years ago that United wouldn't have to sell players. I also failed to predict that United would decline into a mid-table team.

Predictions can be tricky, don't you think?
:lol:
Funny how as soon as someone proves him wrong he can’t handle it and starts to distract from that by making these ridiculous statements.
 

tonnas

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 2, 2013
Messages
759
Spurs will do an Arsenal, with the difference that they have won nothing compared to their rivals. The stadium and debt will cripple them, they cant win major trophies and if they miss the CL this season it will be even worse for them. Kane, Erisksen and co will soon leave as they will need the money, the players will want to win and the wages offered by other bigger clubs will be too good to turn down.

Also Spurs new debt will now go to around 620m !!! United current net debt is at £301.3m, gl spurs.
 
Last edited:

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,888
:lol:
Funny how as soon as someone proves him wrong he can’t handle it and starts to distract from that by making these ridiculous statements.
Well it's not new. He is king of contradictions. He thinks he made correct prediction based on 10 games, that ManUtd slid to midtable but when mid season tables was used last season,

Feb 2018, after 26 games table doesn't give better picture when Spurs are just 2 points off 3 but ManUtd are midtable club after 10 games when they are just 4 points behind Spurs and 5 behind 4th placed team.

Are you seriously talking about the first 7 games of this season (and even if you are we're above Chelsea in the current table)? If so, it's a joke to base anything much on that.
After 28 games, there are more twists and turns before season ends, and none of the teams are nailed on for top 4 when United were 7 points ahead of 5th placed Spurs but if ManUtd are 5 points behind 4th placed team and 4 points behind Spurs after just 10 games means we are midtable team.

Nor does it cut any ice to isolate a current snapshot of the league table, especially when the season still has a fair way to run and we are only 2 points off 3rd.
This thread is full of bullish statements about which teams will finish where in the table - statements that have looked shaky just a couple of weeks later.
There's plenty more twists and turns to go before the season ends ... and none of the current top 5 bar City are nailed on to finish in the top 4.
He never uses table midseason to imply something, unless it's to pat his back for predicting midtable for ManUtd.
I have sometimes used a table mid-season to evidence a points-gap at that moment in time. I have never used it as implied evidence that the table will stay that way until the season ends. There's a difference between the two things.
But the point is that it's the final league table that proves things ... and not where United are now or where they've been for much of the season.
Say what?
You don't seem to get the fact that the season is played over 38 games, during which time things can and do change. Being 2nd now - and being 2nd for most of the season so far - proves nothing yet.
Correction: the final league table never lies. Looking at a mid-season snapshot in time often does.
Wow ... a whole 4 points with 8 games to go (never mind the league table last season or the season before that). And United dumped out of the CL at the same stage as Spurs despite facing a far easier route through both the group stages and beyond.

This is just a sample.
 

James Peril

New Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2016
Messages
3,576
It's a bit ironic. Tottenham are now used to playing in front of 90.000 when they manage to fill up the bowl, but will next year play in a much smaller stadium every other week. From the pictures the stadium looks way less impressive than Wembley in all its greatness. OK, Wembley's location is pretty awful (I was there a month ago for the first time), and the new one is placed closer to its people... but that's not something the players give a shit about, it's not like they live in this part of town anyway.
 

Handré1990

Full Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2013
Messages
4,826
Location
In hibernation
Well it's not new. He is king of contradictions. He thinks he made correct prediction based on 10 games, that ManUtd slid to midtable but when mid season tables was used last season,

Feb 2018, after 26 games table doesn't give better picture when Spurs are just 2 points off 3 but ManUtd are midtable club after 10 games when they are just 4 points behind Spurs and 5 behind 4th placed team.



After 28 games, there are more twists and turns before season ends, and none of the teams are nailed on for top 4 when United were 7 points ahead of 5th placed Spurs but if ManUtd are 5 points behind 4th placed team and 4 points behind Spurs after just 10 games means we are midtable team.





He never uses table midseason to imply something, unless it's to pat his back for predicting midtable for ManUtd.

This is just a sample.
Wow, just wow!
 

Acrobat7

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
5,461
Supports
Bayern Munich
You don’t set up a loan facility, if you’re not planning to use all or at least most of it. And a net debt of 1.5x the annual revenue is not a good look.
 

GlastonSpur

Also disliked on an Aston Villa forum
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
17,716
Supports
Spurs
But you use the numbers in posts telling us how you could easily deal with x and y while in reality you fail to sign anybody during the summer and need to MUFC style refinance your debt which now seem to be linked.
That's nothing to do with official reports. Thats you. Buddy.
The "in reality you fail to sign anybody during the summer and need to MUFC style refinance your debt" is down to me? Wow, I never knew I wielded such influence!

Actually, buddy, I've simply used the figures from Spurs financial reports to suggest that our stadium-related debt will be entirely manageable.

Given that our annual income will soon break the £400m barrier and that our profits are huge, it's not exactly an outrageous suggestion …. except on here, of course, with regard to certain oppo fans, who predict financial ruin …. lol
 

DanClancy

Full Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2015
Messages
1,366
I thought Spurs would be ok if they could keep the debt at about £350m, even at 600m the debt is manageable but Spurs aren't United and they might not benefit from the same level of attractiveness united had when it comes to the bond. Joe Lewis could obviously help them out but that isn't going to happen, going to be extremely difficult to keep Poch if this plays out as I expect.

How much extra a season are Spurs expecting to make in gate receipts?
 

GlastonSpur

Also disliked on an Aston Villa forum
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
17,716
Supports
Spurs
Let's not be hasty. They're a colossal 4 points ahead of us and finished 2nd last season .. I don't think you can brand a team mid table at this point. Otherwise Bournemouth are top 4 challengers.
I was thinking more of their league positions since Fergie retired, including 7th, 5th (twice) and currently 8th,
 

do.ob

Full Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2010
Messages
15,631
Location
Germany
Supports
Borussia Dortmund
I don't know why you name 400m turnover like some magic spell that makes all problems go away.
a) turnover figures by themselves only tell you a fraction of the story.
b) how will that turnover figure look if Spurs don't make top 4?
c) Spurs's competitors have just as much turnover or more, but (afaik) not nearly as much debt they need to service

I don't think Spurs will be threatened with bankruptcy, but it doesn't have to go that far to hurt the club significantly short to mid term. 2-3 windows of little to no investment (while others spend freely), people begin to feel that the club is stagnating, coaches / key players start to angle for transfers that offer them more money and a shot at trophies, you drop out of top 4, income goes down, servicing the debt takes up an even higher relative portion of your earnings. At some point top 5 clubs have left you behind and you're a midtable club, who has to rebuild and play catch up.
 

GlastonSpur

Also disliked on an Aston Villa forum
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
17,716
Supports
Spurs
:lol:
Funny how as soon as someone proves him wrong he can’t handle it and starts to distract from that by making these ridiculous statements.
It's hardly ridiculous to say that United have declined markedly since Fergie retired, to the point where they've finished outside the top 4 more often than not.
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
The "in reality you fail to sign anybody during the summer and need to MUFC style refinance your debt" is down to me? Wow, I never knew I wielded such influence!

Actually, buddy, I've simply used the figures from Spurs financial reports to suggest that our stadium-related debt will be entirely manageable.

Given that our annual income will soon break the £400m barrier and that our profits are huge, it's not exactly an outrageous suggestion …. except on here, of course, with regard to certain oppo fans, who predict financial ruin …. lol
As you go further into debt with spiralling stadium costs...
You forgot that fact. Buddy :)
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,833
The "in reality you fail to sign anybody during the summer and need to MUFC style refinance your debt" is down to me? Wow, I never knew I wielded such influence!

Actually, buddy, I've simply used the figures from Spurs financial reports to suggest that our stadium-related debt will be entirely manageable.

Given that our annual income will soon break the £400m barrier and that our profits are huge, it's not exactly an outrageous suggestion …. except on here, of course, with regard to certain oppo fans, who predict financial ruin …. lol
Like you did for United?
 

Jed I. Knight

The Mos Eisley Hillbilly
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
3,634
Location
Tatooine
It's hardly ridiculous to say that United have declined markedly since Fergie retired, to the point where they've finished outside the top 4 more often than not.
Yeah I don’t know why someone would object to that statement, when it’s probably the least outrageous claim you’ve made in a post since joining.

We’ve become a non-entity when at the very top of English football since Fergie left. Just like Spurs have been for my entire life, so it stands to reason that, as a Spurs fan, you’re well positioned to recognise mediocrity!
 

groovyalbert

it's a mute point
Joined
Feb 14, 2013
Messages
9,761
Location
London
If reports of their debt pushing up towards £600m are true, and if they miss out on top 4 this season, that'll be a real issue for Spurs.

They spent nothing in the market when they believed the stadium was close to completion, with the extra time and costs (both short term and longterm) that have built up, Levy will be reluctant to seriously enter what will almost be an even more inflated market.

This stadium won't cripple Spurs but it could certainly, over the next few seasons, derail the team's impressive and unexpected advances.
 

hellohello

Full Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2015
Messages
1,819
Supports
Tottenham
It's a toss-up, isn't it? Arsenal gambled and lost; now you've thrown the dice as well and we'll see your outcome sometime down the line.

I'm not really having a go at you here, either. If Spurs pull off this new stadium while still managing to compete for (and win) the major honours, it will be a truly impressive feat. Especially against the backdrop of the oil clubs. Arsenal couldn't manage it, but for your sake - and for the sanity of football - I hope you do.

I just found the 'depreciation' and 'exceptional items' quote a little amusing.
It's not like we could be expected to win trophies even without the stadium against the oil clubs. If the stadium allow more supporters the chance to watch the games and generate more income for the team I'd say it's a success. As a fan it's not easy to get tickets, and that in itself is great news imo. The stadium looks amazing and I can't wait to go to a game. If only the tickets could be cheaper as well that would be even better, but that won't happen without fans of football in general going together to put pressure on all clubs, which with the tribalism of football just wont happen.
 

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,497
Location
Birmingham
If reports of their debt pushing up towards £600m are true, and if they miss out on top 4 this season, that'll be a real issue for Spurs.
Not really actually. Champions League is a guaranteed £30m revenue generator at a minimum.
That's not that much when you consider the EPL can guarantee £100m+. A deep run in the Europa League would generate more than the £30m lost.
 

Champ

Refuses to acknowledge existence of Ukraine
Joined
Jun 17, 2017
Messages
9,889
Not really actually. Champions League is a guaranteed £30m revenue generator at a minimum.
That's not that much when you consider the EPL can guarantee £100m+. A deep run in the Europa League would generate more than the £30m lost.
The collateral on the stadium loans is Champions League, as in match day revenue which only the champions League can offer...
 

hellohello

Full Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2015
Messages
1,819
Supports
Tottenham
Not really actually. Champions League is a guaranteed £30m revenue generator at a minimum.
That's not that much when you consider the EPL can guarantee £100m+. A deep run in the Europa League would generate more than the £30m lost.
Yeah with the wage structure and current spending I don't think it will be a problem at all to manage it. What will be affected is obviously our capacity to spend on players and wages, which obviously isn't ideal either, but I have no reason to believe we'll go bankrupt or anything like that.
 

Champ

Refuses to acknowledge existence of Ukraine
Joined
Jun 17, 2017
Messages
9,889
Yeah with the wage structure and current spending I don't think it will be a problem at all to manage it. What will be affected is obviously our capacity to spend on players and wages, which obviously isn't ideal either, but I have no reason to believe we'll go bankrupt or anything like that.
You have so many assests away from the football pitch that bankruptcy will never happen, but it's treacherous ground if Champions League isn't achieved for a few years .
 

groovyalbert

it's a mute point
Joined
Feb 14, 2013
Messages
9,761
Location
London
Not really actually. Champions League is a guaranteed £30m revenue generator at a minimum.
That's not that much when you consider the EPL can guarantee £100m+. A deep run in the Europa League would generate more than the £30m lost.
Not just that though is it - it's all the potential sponsorship deals, and general aura around the club, the Champions League brings. It wouldn't have a massively lasting impact, but it would certainly effect the club in the short term.
 

Sarni

nice guy, unassuming, objective United fan.
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Messages
58,044
Location
Krakow
So I failed to predict from years ago that United wouldn't have to sell players. I also failed to predict that United would decline into a mid-table team.

Predictions can be tricky, don't you think?
Mid-table. :lol: