g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });

WWC19 | Final: USA v Netherlands

JJ12

Predicted Portugal, Italy to win Euro 2016, 2020
Joined
Mar 30, 2016
Messages
10,968
Location
Wales
New gambling low for me. Done first goal scorer here.

Dutch look much better as expected but NZ defending well and 2 brilliant efforts themselves.
 

Lyricist

Full Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2012
Messages
4,068
Location
the booth
What was the best game of the tournament so far? It's just my superficial first opinion, but it seems the overall quality this time hasn't hit past levels yet. The games I've seen have been a bit awkward to watch as almost all goals kind of came out of nowhere and mostly the teams didn't actually look threatening in possession.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,310
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
I think the women's game would benefit from a slightly smaller pitch.
Smaller goals, definitely.

Woman’s football always impresses me with the quality on display, right up until they take a crack at goal and the keeper starts flailing helplessly at fairly central shots.

Which is different to, say, hockey where the women’s keepers look absolutely quality. Guarding a much smaller goal.
 

KirkDuyt

Full Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
24,739
Location
Dutchland
Supports
Feyenoord
Smaller goals, definitely.

Woman’s football always impresses me with the quality on display, right up until they take a crack at goal and the keeper starts flailing helplessly at fairly central shots.

Which is different to, say, hockey where the women’s keepers look absolutely quality. Guarding a much smaller goal.
Indeed.

Regarding the smaller pitch there was actually a New Zealand attack right now where their attacker had to cover quite some distance to the goal, but was so knackered when she got there, should could barely get a shot off. That's why the pitch should be smaller.
 

Spiersey

Full Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2012
Messages
7,386
Location
United Kingdom.
Supports
Chelsea
Decent watch bar the finishing. Unsure how there was only 1 goal. Thought Holland looked pretty good considering it’s the first game of the Comp, they’ll improve a lot as it goes on.
 

NieThePiet

Full Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2017
Messages
2,220
Supports
Werder Bremen, Arsenal
What was the best game of the tournament so far? It's just my superficial first opinion, but it seems the overall quality this time hasn't hit past levels yet. The games I've seen have been a bit awkward to watch as almost all goals kind of came out of nowhere and mostly the teams didn't actually look threatening in possession.
Think England vs Scotland was the best so far, a lot of quality in both sides.

Think the knockout stages games will be better in general, mostly one team is attacking and the other one is only defending so far.
 

Stadjer

Full Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2013
Messages
7,626
Location
The Netherlands
I quite enjoyed watching the Netherlands game.

Less diving, less pretending to be hurt and the technical ability wasnt bad at all. Miedema and Martens looked technically less awkward than Lukaku sometimes does for example.
 

utdalltheway

Sexy Beast
Joined
Aug 20, 2001
Messages
20,539
Location
SoCal, USA
The relief on the Dutchies faces at the end there...
Congrats to them. Hope they improve the next few games though.
 

Grande

Full Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2007
Messages
6,474
Location
The Land of Do-What-You-Will
Only got off work to watch the last fifteen mins. Disappointed not to see Jackie Groenen, hope she’s not injured.

The Dutch again showed they can handle the ball and pass it well, but that they struggle a bit with tearing down a good defense. Great for them that they managed in the end against an impressively sturdy NZ side. They might need it, as Canada is going to prove a tough match for them, I think.
 

utdalltheway

Sexy Beast
Joined
Aug 20, 2001
Messages
20,539
Location
SoCal, USA
Indeed.

Regarding the smaller pitch there was actually a New Zealand attack right now where their attacker had to cover quite some distance to the goal, but was so knackered when she got there, should could barely get a shot off. That's why the pitch should be smaller.
Yeah it seems unfair they play on regulation pitches, but then when you watch the US team or any other quality side, they seem to be fine. Maybe it’s just the fitness levels.
 

Grande

Full Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2007
Messages
6,474
Location
The Land of Do-What-You-Will
Smaller goals, definitely.

Woman’s football always impresses me with the quality on display, right up until they take a crack at goal and the keeper starts flailing helplessly at fairly central shots.

Which is different to, say, hockey where the women’s keepers look absolutely quality. Guarding a much smaller goal.
I’d be more inclined to agree with you if there was a problem of to much/easy goals. After watching Netherlands beat New Zealand 1-0 (barely), Cameroun concede one against Canada yesterday and Japan draw goallessly with Argentine, it’s more like even big favorites are hard pressed to find goals against the smaller teams.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,310
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
I’d be more inclined to agree with you if there was a problem of to much/easy goals. After watching Netherlands beat New Zealand 1-0 (barely), Cameroun concede one against Canada yesterday and Japan draw goallessly with Argentine, it’s more like even big favorites are hard pressed to find goals against the smaller teams.
Yeah. That does undermine my theory. Would be curious to know how the save % of female keepers compares with men. The gulf between them does seem a lot bigger than it is between outfield players.
 

jojojo

JoJoJoJoJoJoJo
Staff
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
38,447
Location
Welcome to Manchester reception committee
Yeah. That does undermine my theory. Would be curious to know how the save % of female keepers compares with men. The gulf between them does seem a lot bigger than it is between outfield players.
I think that's mostly a training/technical thing though rather than reach. I don't think anyone's bothered by the very occasional shot that goes high in the top corner, the striker deserves that. It tends to be the handling/judgment errors that lets them down. I put that down to the fact that until recently most of them were amateurs, and most of the coaching was done by non-specialist amateurs. It's changing though as more teams go pro/semipro, there haven't been many goals scored on keeper errors this World Cup.

The downside to changing goal sizes would be that the women's game in most of the world and most teams even in England etc already struggles to get pitches/stadia. Making it different to the men's game could easily make a difficult situation with access worse.

In any case, it takes football back to its roots - those goal sizes were defined when the average man was roughly the same height as the average woman is today.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,310
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
I think that's mostly a training/technical thing though rather than reach. I don't think anyone's bothered by the very occasional shot that goes high in the top corner, the striker deserves that. It tends to be the handling/judgment errors that lets them down. I put that down to the fact that until recently most of them were amateurs, and most of the coaching was done by non-specialist amateurs. It's changing though as more teams go pro/semipro, there haven't been many goals scored on keeper errors this World Cup.

The downside to changing goal sizes would be that the women's game in most of the world and most teams even in England etc already struggles to get pitches/stadia. Making it different to the men's game could easily make a difficult situation with access worse.

In any case, it takes football back to its roots - those goal sizes were defined when the average man was roughly the same height as the average woman is today.
Yeah, last point is a very good one. I’ve heard arguments that the goals for men’s football should be bigger, for exactly that reason. But, like you say, having different pitches/goals for men and women’s football makes no sense, practically.