Fans planning Old Trafford walkout

TrustInJanuzaj

'Liverpool are a proper club'
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
10,722
Just think it seems silly to be walking out at a stage where the club are clearly in my view heading back in the right direction. The board have made some shocking decisions over the years but they also appear to be doing things differently with Ole and personally I feel optimistic. Bring on the negativity...
 

DJ_21

Evens winner of 'Odds or Evens 2022/2023'
Joined
Aug 31, 2015
Messages
12,166
Location
Manchester
Seems a bit weird if people are walking out and we’re winning the game quite comfortable, also say fernandes doesn’t start the match then surely people are going to want to stay to see him in action the second halve?
 

Fluctuation0161

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2016
Messages
8,165
Location
Manchester
Just think it seems silly to be walking out at a stage where the club are clearly in my view heading back in the right direction. The board have made some shocking decisions over the years but they also appear to be doing things differently with Ole and personally I feel optimistic. Bring on the negativity...
I'll bring on some realism for you.

You could have said that (and many fans have) each season for the past 6 years.

Ultimately they have made mistake after mistake, and until the senior management structure is changed in relation to football decisions they will make even more mistakes.

Dont be complacent after a couple of signings. One of which is a cheap replacement for Lukaku. Another mistake highlighted, not replacing him immediately.
 

jymufc20

Last Man Standing finalist 2019/20
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
3,584
Location
planet earth
My daughter wanted pizza for dinner. I'd already made lasagne and said no.

She stormed out of the kitchen and slammed her bedroom door in a statement of dissatisfaction.

I ordered pizza because I'm pathetic.
:lol:
 

ivaldo

Mediocre Horse Whisperer, s'up wid chew?
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
28,699
This thread...

It sums up why the Glazers were able to take control in 2005, why the protests in 2010 failed and why we’re stuck with them for the foreseeable.

No match going fans are willing to get involved in the organisation, the singing section will bottle it under the guise of “getting behind the team...”

Fair play to the Scousers, Spirit of Shankly are horrible Munich singing tw**s but they know how to protest and get stuff done in their own ground.

Anyway, it’s still all ultimately pointless when everyone renews in May/June and you give them another £800
I've never got this point of view. It is possible to dislike the Glazers and still want to support the club. There are a myriad of reasons for supporters to not want go walk out. This type of protest isn't some magic bullet. Your own club FC United are a perfectly example of that.
 

Dan_F

Full Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
10,398
Just think it seems silly to be walking out at a stage where the club are clearly in my view heading back in the right direction. The board have made some shocking decisions over the years but they also appear to be doing things differently with Ole and personally I feel optimistic. Bring on the negativity...
It’s possible for the club to be progressing from where we’ve been recently and still hate the owners and Ed. I don’t see how we will ever compete with the best teams in Europe again with Ed running the football side of things though.

A mass walk in on 15 minutes, everyone signing anti Glazer songs would be far more productive than a few thousand people dotted around the ground walking out. Still wouldn’t be great though, as you’d need a mass group of people in one section for the chants to work. TRA won’t do it because the club could just pull the plug on that.
 

Flying high

Full Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2015
Messages
1,728
I'm sure it's been said before, but the walkout idea is really not good. Though I applaud the intent.

The idea that half the stadium is going to get up and leave at the same time, when there's no predicting how the match will be at the time, is fantasy.

Far better, imho, to organise a late entry. Leave it 20-30 minutes into the game, with mass protest and chants outside the ground, then walk in together and support the team for the rest of the match(with a good airing of anti glazer singing). I think more are likely to be persuaded to wait outside and miss the start, than leave when the match may be in the balance or at a particularly exciting stage.

Of course, neither way hurts the glazer pocket, but that's not the point here. The point is to send a clear message. That the fans are capable of unity, and that if pushed hard enough by the draining of money from our club, even a fanbase as massive and diverse as ours, will eventually fight back in ways that will hurt their profits.
 

MancunianAngels

Full Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2013
Messages
2,496
Location
Manchester
Supports
FC United
I've never got this point of view. It is possible to dislike the Glazers and still want to support the club. There are a myriad of reasons for supporters to not want go walk out. This type of protest isn't some magic bullet. Your own club FC United are a perfectly example of that.
I get that. My point is that there's a million ideas on how to protest but nobody is willing to take the lead on anything.

The other issue is there needs to be an end game. How far are people willing to go. I fear everything just reaches the summer and everyone renews and things go back to normal for 5 years before another protest kicks off because we have a bad season...
 

JoeyJoJoJrShabadoo

Full Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2019
Messages
1,738
Location
Norn Iron
If the team are playing garbage, which is always possible right now with our wild inconsistency, I see half the stadium upholding the walk out. If we are playing well it will be difficult to get enough out to look like a protest.

I get the feeling Ole will happen to bring Fernandes on at 55 mins to replace Lingard. Jesse will prove beyond a shadow of a doubt he couldn't hit a cows arse with a banjo
 

Cockney Phil

Full Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2018
Messages
587
Location
London
Waste of time. The club only listens to the fans when the fans are on the same page as the club. Always was and has never changed. In the past we were even told our opinions were irrelevant. All a walk out means to the club is: they get the money and the Fans left early.
 

Nogbadthebad

Full Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2011
Messages
5,451
Location
Wolverhampton
I think this is the nearest home game to the 6th, so I whether I agreed or not with the idea of the protest, I would never take part if I were there.

Another day yes, this one, no way.
 

Fox outside the box

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2019
Messages
418
I'll bring on some realism for you.

You could have said that (and many fans have) each season for the past 6 years.

Ultimately they have made mistake after mistake, and until the senior management structure is changed in relation to football decisions they will make even more mistakes.

Dont be complacent after a couple of signings. One of which is a cheap replacement for Lukaku. Another mistake highlighted, not replacing him immediately.
Can this be expanded on though please? I see this 'football decisions' line repeated over and over again but very little context or substance to go with it. I have asked many a person to explain the structure of the club and scouting along with examples of specific decisions made and detail on who agreed what and when etc but I've had nothing.

I'm not disagreeing in full but other than general fan discontent and a lot of media hype, with pretty much fuels the fan discontent we don't get much solid information and this, along with hindsight and a lot of revisionism seems to be leaving people with a far worse opinion of us than I suspect we really deserve.

I feel I need to clarify, because this is the internet of course, that I'm not suggesting we have been perfectly run but when you say we can't make good football decisions and we have made mistake after mistake but most of these are in hindsight. At the time, a large majority of the fan base seemed optimistic or in favour of most of the decisions made with the exception really of Moyes and that Summer. Even then, it wasn't uncommon to see messages of general support, some optimism and getting behind him/respecting Fergie's request to back him.

https://www.redcafe.net/threads/man...le-in-giggs-player-coach-albert-stays.370530/

In terms of managers, we have brought in Moyes, LVG and Mourinho prior to Solskjaer.

LVG came with a very good CV and if you browse back to before/at the time of his appointment, people we again generally optimistic. Certainly no overwhelming calls that this was a mistake or a bad choice. This was another decision that at the time, people felt was solid, sensible and could lead to success. Whilst not littered with success, LVG did bring a trophy to his time here.

Fast forward to Mourinho and this was a bit more divided but he came with a brilliant record and it was difficult to call how it would go. A good start and a second place finish along with the Europa league helped during his tenure but at the time of his appointment, he could easily be regarded as a solid choice. Someone who has a great CV, can come back in and steady the ship. Possibly a more short term appointment but one that made sense all the same.

Then if you go back and review comments after most of our signings, very rarely were they called bad signings or mistakes. The baord have seemingly backed the manager (with the exception of Moyes) and allowed them to generally bring signings in that suit their goal or style.

Under LVG we brought in:

Herrera
Di Maria
Falcao
Shaw
Rojo
Fosu-Mensah
Valdes

Whilst shipping out players such as Kagawa, Buttner, Bebe, Fletcher, Wellbeck, Anderson amongst others. All Ferguson players and all had been deemed not good enough, under performers or a flop. Even Fergie wasn't perfect I guess?

His signings were generally met with a lot of optimism - https://www.redcafe.net/threads/lou...cao-and-blind-unveiled-11-09-14.396414/page-2 - look through a lot of comments here

More general optimism - https://www.redcafe.net/threads/the-rojo-herrera-di-maria-mata-bromance.396520/

People were generally ecstatic as bringing in Di Maria - https://www.redcafe.net/threads/official-manchester-united-sign-Ángel-di-maría.395387/

There were a lot of positives around Mourinho's signings - https://www.redcafe.net/threads/mourinhos-signings.424402/

Plenty of people were calling for Solskjaer to be given a permanent contract before he got the job. Our form and play was so good that he was backed more and more to get the job. Go and look at fan channels, Neville and other sources at the time, a lot of optimism around this as well. United legend, managed the reserve team, understood the club, the culture, you could tell the players respected him, the fans did as well etc.

Again, not an overwhelming criticism that this was a clueless move from the board and was a massive mistake.

Most of the decisions made, most of the transfers in and manager decisions to both appoint and dismiss have generally been supported at the time.

If the fan base and general football world, fan channels, pundits etc have generally supported a lot of these decisions then how can we look back now and accuse the board of being clueless? Change may be needed but clueless?

I could drag up more and more comments, videos, threads from other forums as well that supported a lot of what has happened - at the time - and it's important to remember this.

A lot hasn't worked out and we may well need to review the structure and get some more help in but to summarise, I think it's getting a bit out of hand in terms of accusing people of incompetence. People are almost trying to out do each other on how much hyperbole they could add in to how bad we/the board/Woodward are and have been that it's getting silly.

We're not in a great place currently but let's not pretend we've been calling everything out as and when it happened because we haven't. People BUZZED off signing Pogba. We've tried appointing managers that people have generally backed at the time, we've supported them with signings they wanted for a large part and signings that people were generally happy with. We've spent a lot of money on transfers, brought in some top, top players as well as some top prospects (at the time. Shaw and Memphis being 2 examples of players that were seen to have very high ceilings).

Our biggest failing has been moving from manager to manager who do not share a general philosophy. It's left the squad with pockets of different types of players and styles and we look now to be pressing reset and looking to put together a squad of players that even if we move Ole on, we can bring someone in who will be happy to work with them. Not have to look to try and ship out 7 or 8 and bring 7 or 8 more in but get sacked part way through doing so and so the cycle starts again.

It's easy for us to sit here and act like experts on a forum and we have the right to debate and critique but as I said, it's getting a little bit over the top now. I don't feel like we have made awful decision after awful decision it's just multiple things didn't work out, players didn't click or develop and throw in some blame to go in terms of the structure and I think you've got a LOT of different reasons we are where we are. I wish we could discuss these in a sensible, more detailed manner rather than literally hold Woodward up as the one reason we're in the position we are. Throw in the constant ad hominem attacks and there's almost no debated or discussion currently, just lots of tantrums and people with very short memories.
 

Big Ben Foster

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
12,765
Location
BR -> MI -> TX
Supports
Also support Vasco da Gama
A few signings and everyone loves Woodward again :rolleyes:

Our club is doomed.
 

Damien

Self-Aware RedCafe Database (and Admin)
Staff
Joined
Mar 4, 2010
Messages
97,218
Location
Also won Best Gif/Photoshop 2021
Fully support anyone who is walking out. I see it has been changed to the 68th minute which is the right decision as this cannot be linked in any manner to the Munich tragic events. Good on the fans for arranging this, hope we see a lot of empty seats. It might only be a small act, but hopefully the start of a major campaign to either get rid of the Glazers and Woodward, or get them to change their ways.
It still will be as it is taking place on the match closest to the Munich anniversary.
 

T00lsh3d

T00ly O' Sh3d
Joined
Mar 20, 2014
Messages
8,454
For the people against the walkout.....do you have any other suggestions that are a realistic way to display dissatisfaction with the running of the club?
 

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,381
Location
Birmingham
I am not for walkout. I don't care enough about this club right now.
However. I am sick and tired of the people saying don't do this, don't do that without putting up any ideas.
 

van Nistelrooy

Full Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2017
Messages
1,033
I'd much rather walk out and make a stand than watch the usual dross for the remaining 20-30 minutes.

Come on! Walk out and make a statement today!

#GlazersOut #WoodwardOut
 

Schweinsteiger

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
383
People who are complaining about poor timing for a walk out just don’t get it. It’s not about timing. It’s not about because we bought 1 player 2 days ago that we should “hold off”. This needs to be done because of long lasting effects the Glazer family and EW has had on the club.
 

Adamsk7

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
2,706
I don’t understand the point of this. People say the club isn’t managed properly, that the Glazers don’t spend money or that Ed Woodward is an idiot but there’s no proof of any of this. They say the signings have been terrible but is it Ed’s fail that big name players haven’t performed? That Di Maria was a cry baby? That Van Gaal player tumescent football, that Mourinho wound up everyone he talked to?

If anything, Ed and the board are guilty of thinking that big names and big reputations would carry on our success - to be honest, there are not many out there that wouldn’t have thought that was the best option. Now they know it’s not, we’ve seen a shift and they are supporting Ole, not only in backing his ideas but also in the transfer market - we’ve spent over £45m on three players in two windows! That’s not under investment, no club is made of money!

any time I hear criticism it’s 100% based on media articles that are solely written to sell or opinion based on nothing more than “I dislike Woodward”

personally, I think the club is going in the right direction. I’d quite like a director of football but I think Ole has been unlucky with key injuries this season - with Rashford, Pogba and McT playing alongside Bruno, I think we’d look a LOT better.

I am by no means a fan of the Glazers and how they purchased the clubbut I haven’t seen anything to say that we should walk out on the team. The managers and (big) players we have signed just haven’t done the business. That’s on them.
 

SqueakyWeasel

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2013
Messages
14,928
Location
Taking the next corner instead of Jones!
Applause on the 58th min is a great idea. We should have been doing that on the closest home game anyway.
I'm not against the walkout but I feel it’ll never be co-ordinated enough to be anywhere near a visual success to have the desired effect. If it ends up looking like a patchy City home crowd against lower league opposition it’ll just reflect badly on us. I just hope the people walking out don't get into arguments with any people who disagree … and vice versa.
Whatever happens (even if the walkout is 100%) I fear the likes of the Daily Mail will not report and explain the real reasons behind the action. They will probably report about spoilt and disingenuous fans complaining after a “positive” window by the club management and will somehow tie it to the “attack” on Woodward’s house mid-week.
 

bondsname

Full Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2018
Messages
1,059
Seems a bit weird if people are walking out and we’re winning the game quite comfortable, also say fernandes doesn’t start the match then surely people are going to want to stay to see him in action the second halve?
It would be hilarious if the plan to walk-out is scrapped because we signed a player.
 

Random Task

WW Lynchpin
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
34,503
Location
Chester
I wonder how much impact the signings of Bruno and Ighalo will have had in the match goers who're planning this walkout.

The United fans are generally a stoic bunch, so I expect them to follow through with this threat regardless.
 

Handsome Devil

Full Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
1,481
Location
No, not Lisbon..Lisburn!
When I first read about a walk out, I thought, oh no, the Scousers are going to have a field day with this and what they see as the continuous comedy centred around the running of our club. You only have to look at their comments in rags like the vile Mailonline for example everytime there is a story about United.
And then I thought, some Scouse fans seem to be more obsessed about United's failures than their own club. Doesn't matter what we do, they pounce on it.
So feck it! Go for it!
 

Ander herrera the warrior

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 28, 2018
Messages
175
Fans to Ed : We are planning a mass walkout at 58 minutes

Ed to Ole : Bring on Bruno at 57th minute

Ed to fans : Checkmate

On a serious note, I think this should have been planned in the middle of the January transfer window, not sure how effective it is now since we did reasonably ok in this window.
 

M Bison

Full Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Messages
6,838
Location
In the Wilderness
Supports
York City
I hope there isn’t a walk out. Makes us look daft.

The owners/management aren’t going anywhere, unlikely players we’re targeting are going to sign for us seeing our fan base behave like that.
 

clarkydaz

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2013
Messages
13,421
Location
manchester
Fans to Ed : We are planning a mass walkout at 58 minutes

Ed to Ole : Bring on Bruno at 57th minute

Ed to fans : Checkmate

On a serious note, I think this should have been planned in the middle of the January transfer window, not sure how effective it is now since we did reasonably ok in this window.
68 mins it is then :D
 

Lennon7

nipple flasher and door destroyer
Joined
May 8, 2013
Messages
10,475
Location
M5
I’m on board with this but knowing the glazers it won’t change a thing. They’ve got your money.
 

Lynty

Full Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2014
Messages
3,094
Can this be expanded on though please? I see this 'football decisions' line repeated over and over again but very little context or substance to go with it. I have asked many a person to explain the structure of the club and scouting along with examples of specific decisions made and detail on who agreed what and when etc but I've had nothing.

I'm not disagreeing in full but other than general fan discontent and a lot of media hype, with pretty much fuels the fan discontent we don't get much solid information and this, along with hindsight and a lot of revisionism seems to be leaving people with a far worse opinion of us than I suspect we really deserve.

I feel I need to clarify, because this is the internet of course, that I'm not suggesting we have been perfectly run but when you say we can't make good football decisions and we have made mistake after mistake but most of these are in hindsight. At the time, a large majority of the fan base seemed optimistic or in favour of most of the decisions made with the exception really of Moyes and that Summer. Even then, it wasn't uncommon to see messages of general support, some optimism and getting behind him/respecting Fergie's request to back him.

https://www.redcafe.net/threads/man...le-in-giggs-player-coach-albert-stays.370530/

In terms of managers, we have brought in Moyes, LVG and Mourinho prior to Solskjaer.

LVG came with a very good CV and if you browse back to before/at the time of his appointment, people we again generally optimistic. Certainly no overwhelming calls that this was a mistake or a bad choice. This was another decision that at the time, people felt was solid, sensible and could lead to success. Whilst not littered with success, LVG did bring a trophy to his time here.

Fast forward to Mourinho and this was a bit more divided but he came with a brilliant record and it was difficult to call how it would go. A good start and a second place finish along with the Europa league helped during his tenure but at the time of his appointment, he could easily be regarded as a solid choice. Someone who has a great CV, can come back in and steady the ship. Possibly a more short term appointment but one that made sense all the same.

Then if you go back and review comments after most of our signings, very rarely were they called bad signings or mistakes. The baord have seemingly backed the manager (with the exception of Moyes) and allowed them to generally bring signings in that suit their goal or style.

Under LVG we brought in:

Herrera
Di Maria
Falcao
Shaw
Rojo
Fosu-Mensah
Valdes

Whilst shipping out players such as Kagawa, Buttner, Bebe, Fletcher, Wellbeck, Anderson amongst others. All Ferguson players and all had been deemed not good enough, under performers or a flop. Even Fergie wasn't perfect I guess?

His signings were generally met with a lot of optimism - https://www.redcafe.net/threads/lou...cao-and-blind-unveiled-11-09-14.396414/page-2 - look through a lot of comments here

More general optimism - https://www.redcafe.net/threads/the-rojo-herrera-di-maria-mata-bromance.396520/

People were generally ecstatic as bringing in Di Maria - https://www.redcafe.net/threads/official-manchester-united-sign-Ángel-di-maría.395387/

There were a lot of positives around Mourinho's signings - https://www.redcafe.net/threads/mourinhos-signings.424402/

Plenty of people were calling for Solskjaer to be given a permanent contract before he got the job. Our form and play was so good that he was backed more and more to get the job. Go and look at fan channels, Neville and other sources at the time, a lot of optimism around this as well. United legend, managed the reserve team, understood the club, the culture, you could tell the players respected him, the fans did as well etc.

Again, not an overwhelming criticism that this was a clueless move from the board and was a massive mistake.

Most of the decisions made, most of the transfers in and manager decisions to both appoint and dismiss have generally been supported at the time.

If the fan base and general football world, fan channels, pundits etc have generally supported a lot of these decisions then how can we look back now and accuse the board of being clueless? Change may be needed but clueless?

I could drag up more and more comments, videos, threads from other forums as well that supported a lot of what has happened - at the time - and it's important to remember this.

A lot hasn't worked out and we may well need to review the structure and get some more help in but to summarise, I think it's getting a bit out of hand in terms of accusing people of incompetence. People are almost trying to out do each other on how much hyperbole they could add in to how bad we/the board/Woodward are and have been that it's getting silly.

We're not in a great place currently but let's not pretend we've been calling everything out as and when it happened because we haven't. People BUZZED off signing Pogba. We've tried appointing managers that people have generally backed at the time, we've supported them with signings they wanted for a large part and signings that people were generally happy with. We've spent a lot of money on transfers, brought in some top, top players as well as some top prospects (at the time. Shaw and Memphis being 2 examples of players that were seen to have very high ceilings).

Our biggest failing has been moving from manager to manager who do not share a general philosophy. It's left the squad with pockets of different types of players and styles and we look now to be pressing reset and looking to put together a squad of players that even if we move Ole on, we can bring someone in who will be happy to work with them. Not have to look to try and ship out 7 or 8 and bring 7 or 8 more in but get sacked part way through doing so and so the cycle starts again.

It's easy for us to sit here and act like experts on a forum and we have the right to debate and critique but as I said, it's getting a little bit over the top now. I don't feel like we have made awful decision after awful decision it's just multiple things didn't work out, players didn't click or develop and throw in some blame to go in terms of the structure and I think you've got a LOT of different reasons we are where we are. I wish we could discuss these in a sensible, more detailed manner rather than literally hold Woodward up as the one reason we're in the position we are. Throw in the constant ad hominem attacks and there's almost no debated or discussion currently, just lots of tantrums and people with very short memories.
Agreed. Good post.


Cringeworthy. So small time.
My feelings also.

I'm not against fans communicating their views to the board. But what do they hope to achieve in this walk out?

It doesn't demand a response.
The discontent among fans at Glazer ownserhip isn't a new development.
Fan support for the protest is still unknown with 3 hours to go.

It's literally what children do when they aren't happy. Everyone can shrug their shoulders and ignore the walk out, Sportbible can pick up the story and spin it to make our fanbase look pathetic and it'll be quickly brushed over or condemnd by the pundits.

Its cringeworthy.
 

GiddyUp

Full Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2015
Messages
4,913
I don’t understand the point of this. People say the club isn’t managed properly, that the Glazers don’t spend money or that Ed Woodward is an idiot but there’s no proof of any of this. They say the signings have been terrible but is it Ed’s fail that big name players haven’t performed? That Di Maria was a cry baby? That Van Gaal player tumescent football, that Mourinho wound up everyone he talked to?

If anything, Ed and the board are guilty of thinking that big names and big reputations would carry on our success - to be honest, there are not many out there that wouldn’t have thought that was the best option. Now they know it’s not, we’ve seen a shift and they are supporting Ole, not only in backing his ideas but also in the transfer market - we’ve spent over £45m on three players in two windows! That’s not under investment, no club is made of money!

any time I hear criticism it’s 100% based on media articles that are solely written to sell or opinion based on nothing more than “I dislike Woodward”

personally, I think the club is going in the right direction. I’d quite like a director of football but I think Ole has been unlucky with key injuries this season - with Rashford, Pogba and McT playing alongside Bruno, I think we’d look a LOT better.

I am by no means a fan of the Glazers and how they purchased the clubbut I haven’t seen anything to say that we should walk out on the team. The managers and (big) players we have signed just haven’t done the business. That’s on them.
Jesus christ take off the blindfold. It's been a shit show for 6 seasons now and our transfer policy is the laughingstock of the sport. Our owners are terrible, our manager is bang average at best and our players are inconsistent and lack leadership.
We are all over the place regardless of the baby steps we've taken. We just signed a player who should have been here last summer and an ex Watford striker on loan from China through sheer panic because of shitty planning.
To say everything is rosey going forward even though we have the same fools running the show is very naive.
 

Kill 'em all

Pastor of Muppets
Joined
Sep 15, 2012
Messages
10,546
If this continues, we won't even need a walkout. Empty seats will start showing up given enough time.