Pretty much all of it. Except for the bits that have been deceptively edited.
2.45 - Chemist
thinks there is a political agenda. Only backs this up with the statement that the WHO exaggerate things. Whereas the WHO have been accused of underplaying this pandemic. So nothing more than an opinion that barely rises to the status of a non sequitur.
3.00 - misrepresents COVID deaths as equivalent to a flu season. This is obviously and demonstrably wrong. Deaths are massively beyond an annual flu season already and we aren't anywhere near done yet - not to mention deaths to date are likely rapidly approaching 1 million already due to poor reporting.
3.44 - clip says death RATE likely lower due to a lack of testing of mildly symptomatic cases. Yes. But so what? It will still be hugely worse than flu and hundreds of thousands of people are actually dead already and lots more will follow until we have a vaccine.
4.30 - blah, blah, blah - Skynet. Then more "just another RNA virus" bullshit.
8.00 - only the old die so feck the old - take one for the team you selfish bastards.
9.00 - more "its just a flu" bullshit.
10.00 - this is probably worse than the bullshit. This guy did an
antibody study that suggested less than 5% of Californians had been infected. His study was to improve understanding of the pandemic and that understanding was that herd immunity without a vaccine was impossible without huge mortality. They edited an interview to make it seem like he supported the agenda of the video. I hope he sues them.
If I had longer between meetings I'd find far more bullshit in there I'm sure.