David Silva statue will be built at Etihad stadium

Deery

Dreary
Joined
May 21, 2019
Messages
18,590
People thought I was going overboard when I said he’s getting a lot of recognition for leaving now they building him a bloody statue.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
96,058
Location
india
:lol: City

You shouldn't be building statues right when the chap's time at your club has ended FFS. He's hardly a SAF type figure for them.

They'll have more statues than fans if they keep this rate up.
:lol:

Also, he's a very good player, but Aguero was better so I guess he can expect one too. Madness.
 

Jeppers7

Pogfamily Mafia
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
7,435
10 years, 309 games, 60 goals, 4 league titles, 8 cups and 3 shields.

I’m not going to judge them for this one, he’s been an absolutely wonderful player and in City’s history his legacy will be as high as any.
Ok...can you imagine we did this ? Nicky Butt would have a statue.....also wtf did you include ‘Shields’ ?
 

nyanza

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 14, 2017
Messages
468
Location
Bulgaria
They can start offering statues in contracts to beat others for major signings. :lol:
 

Chipper

Adulterer.
Joined
Oct 25, 2017
Messages
5,901
How is that small time? Does only big clubs can celebrate their big players? David Silva marked their history and in their context it makes total sense to celebrate him and a few others.
By definition is not small time or am I misunderstanding the term?

A bigger club with bigger legends would have a higher threshold for giving out statues than a smaller club with a smaller-scale legends. Big clubs are 'big time clubs' with big time achievements and bigger legends of the game than smaller ones who are therefore kind of small time comparatively speaking.
 

Crustanoid

New Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2008
Messages
18,511
Maybe if they give him massive sideburns and Victorian garb, smoking a pipe or something, then people will think its a really old player who was part of their long history and not someone from after 2008.
 

SilentWitness

ShoelessWitness
Staff
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
31,879
Supports
Everton
Yeah but you don't (or shouldn't) put statues up for that
That's why they're not. They're putting one up because he was that and because he is one of 4? (Yaya, him, Aguero, Kompany) players that have defined the best decade the club has ever achieved.
 

Suedesi

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2001
Messages
23,909
Location
New York City
A legend yes - but immortalised as a statue right now? City are pushing to create a heritage and Silva was a great PL player but it's not like you see Terry or Lampard statues outside Stamford Bridge or even Gerrard at Anfield although no doubt they'll build a 20ft, Christ the Redeemer style Klopp one soon.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

I'm also in the camp that he was a tad overrated as a player. He was good, but no Xavi, Iniesta, Alonso or Busquets - and don't see Barca erecting some statues anytime soon. But City is a really small club so par for the course I guess.
 

Nou_Camp99

what would Souness do?
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
10,274
Yeah but you don't (or shouldn't) put statues up for that
Says who? He's won 4 league titles and numerous cups. Not like he's come along and just won the odd thing is it? Why be bitter about it. Silva is one of the greatest players to ever play for them.
 

RooneyLegend

New Member
Joined
May 3, 2013
Messages
12,963
Still shocked we don't have one for Eric to be honest. Tad extreme but he was a great player for them.
 

Jeppers7

Pogfamily Mafia
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
7,435
I mean there are plenty of examples of clubs getting a lot of money and doing nothing with it. From 2010 - 2020 they've won 4 PL titles and 7 domestic cups and a domestic treble. This is the best the club has ever done in its history and yes, it was due to finances but the players on the pitch also have to contribute and people like Silva/Kompany/Aguero most definitely have. Not every club is United with a rich history, to them it's a defining era for them.



Just sounds like it's okay for one club but because it's City everyone will laugh at it when not all clubs have the same history.
You don’t see the difference between marking the achievements of a manager of 25 years of success unparalleled, and a player who in the grand scheme of things had a career success equivalent to Nicky Butt?
 

Nou_Camp99

what would Souness do?
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
10,274
I'm not bitter I just find it small time and humorous, typical little City :lol:
Fair enough......I have always liked him. Classy on the pitch and off it too. Never hear a bad thing said about a lot of their players it has to be said. Can't stand their fans but I can appreciate world class talent.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
66,747
Location
France
It’s just quite funny considering City have only been relevant since the oil money came in. Sure he’s a good player but proper ‘elite’ clubs don’t put up statues of good players, they save that for the absolute best. City just highlighting their lack of history yet again.
But without disrespect, they aren't a proper elite club(if you mean old successful club), they are an old club with new money and some of their recent players genuinely marked a decade of their history, in their context it's a fair criteria. Now I assume that many will use United as reference and it's true that for United it would make no sense because the Holy Trinity symbolizes three Ballon d'Or winners in the same decade who are also among United first CL winners, by that criteria only Ronaldo should get a statue among all players since the trinity. But I'm pretty sure that a few players could get a statue with no one laughing.
 

do.ob

Full Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2010
Messages
15,643
Location
Germany
Supports
Borussia Dortmund
Is David Silva really such a special player in the grand scheme of things? He's no academy player of theirs, wasn't their captain (I think?). His CL stats are actually outright pathetic. If you had to pick between prime de Bruyne and prime D. Silva would you waste thought on the latter? To me as an outsider Kompany and Agüero are at least as much an icon of their success, maybe even Yaya.
 

SuperiorXI

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
14,862
Location
Manchester, England
Fair enough......I have always liked him. Classy on the pitch and off it too. Never hear a bad thing said about a lot of their players it has to be said. Can't stand their fans but I can appreciate world class talent.
Silva is a wonderful player, there's no debating that. But a statue? Bit much.
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
69,048
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
Ok...can you imagine we did this ? Nicky Butt would have a statue.....also wtf did you include ‘Shields’ ?
I separated the Shields from the Cups because people get precious over them. Apparently some people are just precious regardless.


Comparing Nicky Butt to David Silva is a bit daft, he’s been a world class, key component to the most successful time in their history. I’ve already said it’s a bit daft making a statue so soon, the quote you have quoted is me saying that for City, with such limited success in their history, Silva qualifies.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
21,439
Just sounds like it's okay for one club but because it's City everyone will laugh at it when not all clubs have the same history.
Well if we'd erected statues for Giggs, Rooney or Carrick before they retired i think you'd have a point.

A statue for a man who has managed the same club for 25 years and a player who has played for one for 10 aren't really comparable. Especially considering Ferguson was obviously going to retire shortly after the statue was erected (turned out only a few months later) and it's not like Ferguson was ever going to manage another team after United.

I have no problem with City building a statue for Silva if they want to, but it seems weird to do it while he's playing for another club.
 

Suedesi

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2001
Messages
23,909
Location
New York City
The only one who deserves a statue for City - so far - is Raheem Sterling for the miss of the century. That should be celebrated eternally.
 

Prodigal7

Full Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2015
Messages
2,288
Location
Daenerys' pants
Silva was a great player but for statues you need to be legendary and Silva was not, even by City's low legend standards.
Maybe a cardboard cutout would have been a sensible compromise.
 

Dante

Average bang
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
25,280
Location
My wit's end
Just sounds like it's okay for one club but because it's City everyone will laugh at it when not all clubs have the same history.
That's all fine, and I don't disagree. But there's a context to the appropriateness of statues just like there's a context to everything else.

A king or queen wears a crown, but it shouldn't be worn by a CEO. A pope wears a mitre, but it shouldn't be worn by a school headmaster. A statue represents a memorable history, but it shouldn't represent a recently passed present.

Silva has definitely done enough to earn a statue, but now is too early to build one.

It's like your little old brother wanting to have his own cake because he's jealous you have one on your birthday. It silly and childish. He'll get his turn when it's time. Blowing out a candle doesn't make him any more mature today. Your mum will probably let him do it, mind you, but that doesn't mean you can't laugh at him for it for how pathetic he's being.

By the same token, people are laughing at City for how small time it is to adopt the trappings of history without having gone through it yet.
 

keithsingleton

Full Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2012
Messages
1,368
Location
Salford
I think if I was Silva or Kompany, espically the latter I would be well miffed about that. They should of followed our example of Best - Law - Charlton. Much as I hate saying it from the noisy neighbors point of view it makes more sence. However, since when do those feckers do sence :lol:
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
66,747
Location
France
By definition is not small time or am I misunderstanding the term?

A bigger club with bigger legends would have a higher threshold for giving out statues than a smaller club with a smaller-scale legends. Big clubs are 'big time clubs' with big time achievements and bigger legends of the game than smaller ones who are therefore kind of small time comparatively speaking.
Small time is relative and in that case for City, it's not. It would be small-time for United, someone like David Silva would have to do a lot more to be a legend at United but again we are not talking about United. In some clubs it's barely a thing, how many players have a status at Real Madrid, Di Stefano?

PS: I don't really like the idea of status in general but clubs have vastly different histories and criteria, at least there is some sense in that one, unlike the Bellingham shenanigans.