HabeasC
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2013
- Messages
- 3,600
Only if you're following the US election. Otherwise as relevant / irrelevant as those regions in the normal course.No. Michigan and Wisconsin are actually relevant.
Only if you're following the US election. Otherwise as relevant / irrelevant as those regions in the normal course.No. Michigan and Wisconsin are actually relevant.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
didn't know that, thanks!Both have 47 (Dems have 2 independents in Sanders and King).
yes.Just to confirm Nevada, Wisconsin and Michigan means Biden wins right?
already on my third bottle mate. Working from home is the best!
Didn't even know there was an election going on til I popped the third one.
It would be a slip up of Gerrard proportionsNevada is a bit of a worry, otherwise should be in the bag.
What's with AZ, when will those results be official ? AP already gave that state to Biden..
This is it. Champagne will be popped open tonight and then tomorrow morning Nevada will go to Trump and then the sky will turn blood red.Nevada is a bit of a worry, otherwise should be in the bag.
What's with AZ, when will those results be official ? AP already gave that state to Biden..
The American people are to blame.There was a hope for a resounding victory that might provide a basis for sweeping away the shitstain that was Trump's presidency. Instead we had a president say that counting votes is stealing an election if rump is already winning. So yeah.
Likely, biggest hope is that both Georgia seats go to a run-off and there's a huge Dem effort to get them over the line in Jan.So is the senate definitely staying Republican?
Surely this has to be revisited?I’ll admit, it is great theater. I just hate the EC system.
YepJust to confirm Nevada, Wisconsin and Michigan means Biden wins right?
It will for a while yes. However there's local elections coming soon I think which could change that.So is the senate definitely staying Republican?
That single vote in NE could decide the whole thing.Biden(238) + WI(10) + MI(16) + NV(6) = 270
Trump(213) + PA(20) + NC(15) + GA(16) + AK(3) + 1 vote in Maine which is lean Red = 268
PA and GA can still flip.
I don't think Nevada is much of a worryNevada is a bit of a worry, otherwise should be in the bag.
What's with AZ, when will those results be official ? AP already gave that state to Biden..
And Trump can lose in ‘16 by 2 million votes and win by about 100 EC votes.So Biden, who has broken the record for most votes ever received by a candidate for a US Presidential Election might still not be President.
Absolutely bonkers!
I love how sassy Nate has gotten this election.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Johnny Rotten supporting the billionaire sums up the stupidity behind Trump's success. His reasoning appears to be solely based on him not being a politician and that apparently being refreshing.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
The state of this. Of course Johnny Rotten that noted anti establishment voice is noe a Trump supporter.
He needs AZ and maybe ME as well to get it, IINM.Just to confirm Nevada, Wisconsin and Michigan means Biden wins right?
Because it favours the Republicans. If it favoured the democrats it would have been changed a long time ago.And Trump can lose in ‘16 by 2 million votes and win by about 100 EC votes.
But people still “objectively” argue the EC is a solid way to do things. Yeah, right...
How will the Perdue-Ossoff race go to run-off?Likely, biggest hope is that both Georgia seats go to a run-off and there's a huge Dem effort to get them over the line in Jan.
If neither are above 50%How will the Perdue-Ossoff race go to run-off?
HahahahaTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
The state of this. Of course Johnny Rotten that noted anti establishment voice is noe a Trump supporter.
It would require an amendment, and the GOP (who used to be in favor of getting rid of it) will defend its existence with their supporters very lives if they have to.Surely this has to be revisited?
Clinton won by three million votes in 2016; Biden is going to win by many more than that - the fact that it's on a knife edge like this seems, as someone watching from the outside, like a complete nonsense.
Is that 50% rule only for Georgia?If neither are above 50%
The problem is, as it was in 2016, most polling can't really get an accurate random representative data set. Period. Too many people take polls as gospel (I blame how the media constantly reports every single poll including meaningless nationwide popular vote polls). They are all based on subjective weighting factors that hopefully balance out but lately they didn't weight them accurately.All the swing state results are way closer to RCP's weighted average than they are to what you/538 were claiming.
I am too tired to discuss further if your entire argument is that Trump actually getting fairly good turnout numbers is a systematic polling error and therefore can be ignored. That's a hilariously bad take.
If he wins Wisconsin , Pennsylvania and Michigan does he still need Nevada?I don't think Nevada is much of a worry
Biden's ahead and mostly mail in votes to come
Truer words were never said!Come on you geriatric bugger, pull through, beat the other slightly less geriatric cnut!!!
YepIs that 50% rule only for Georgia?
No.If he wins Wisconsin , Pennsylvania and Michigan does he still need Nevada?
Not sure he is. It's just that red counties have been counted first. Still in play.Why is Biden losing Pennsylvania?
If Collins doesn't get 50% in Maine I believe it goes to ranked choice voting, but that won't need a re-run and she probably still takes it.Is that 50% rule only for Georgia?
If you can believe it, back in 1970, Richard Nixon was working with congressional Democrats to abolish the EC.Surely this has to be revisited?
Clinton won by three million votes in 2016; Biden is going to win by many more than that - the fact that it's on a knife edge like this seems, as someone watching from the outside, like a complete nonsense.
He didn't say he was from Scranton enough.Why is Biden losing Pennsylvania?