Is De Gea Man Utd Legend?

Is David de Gea Quintana a Manchester United legend?


  • Total voters
    447
  • Poll closed .

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,255
Location
Hollywood CA
Haha no, of course not.

Legend is relative but at our club it requires being part of and continuing the legacy of winning trophies, the big ones. He's been a grand stopper though.
That's why Wes Brown and David May are legends.
 

DOTA

wants Amber Rudd to call him a naughty boy
Joined
Jul 3, 2012
Messages
24,504
No. He was unlucky in that the years he was absolutely brilliant for us, we were too crap to win anything of note.
 

Samid

He's no Bilal Ilyas Jhandir
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
49,548
Location
Oslo, Norway
Never. Complete liability for the past 2.5 years. Absolutely nothing to show for in European comps other than bottlejobs. History won’t be kind to him.
 

1nil

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 2, 2020
Messages
56
Legend for not leaving sooner. He could've easily jumped ship
 

Samid

He's no Bilal Ilyas Jhandir
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
49,548
Location
Oslo, Norway
No. He was unlucky in that the years he was absolutely brilliant for us, we were too crap to win anything of note.
Alternatively he was a plucky underdog who rose to the occasion when expectations were low. And failed miserably when we were expected to win things. He let both his club and his country down so many times in knockout competitions when the pressure was on. The guy isn’t a winner. Never has had that mentality, never will.
 

Zlatan 7

We've got bush!
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
11,797
I'm really surprised how many people think the number of trophies won is important to someone's chances of being deemed a legend. I wouldn't consider it to be relevant at all.

Someone can't force their teammates to play better and win stuff!

"Legend" should be determined by how good an individual was at their role and for how long, compared to others in that position, surely?
There’s no clear metric, just feeling imo. Ole wasn’t the greatest ever striker and Cantona wasn’t here years and years. Both absolute legends.
 

DOTA

wants Amber Rudd to call him a naughty boy
Joined
Jul 3, 2012
Messages
24,504
Alternatively he was a plucky underdog who rose to the occasion when expectations were low. And failed miserably when we were expected to win things. He let both his club and his country down so many times in knockout competitions when the pressure was on. The guy isn’t a winner. Never has had that mentality, never will.
What knockout competition did he let us down in?
 

Cantona'sCollar

Full Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
2,033
Location
Guangzhou
Short memories. De Gea was the best keeper in the world for years. He and Neuer had no competition.
I love VDS and I think he was better for longer, but he was not the best in the world for as long as DDG was. He also played behind the best defence in the history of this club, and statistically one of the best club defences ever.

'hE iS a gOod shOt sToPpeR nOt a gOod goAlkeEpEr' as if we are talking about Brad Friedel ffs.

So Sir Alex, LVG and Jose are all idiots. Okay.
 
Last edited:

Caesar2290

New Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2019
Messages
1,283
When I say legend I think of Sir Bobby, Law, Best, Scholes, Giggs and even Rooney to a certain extent. Does DDG come close to any of these guys? Nope

Than we have cult heroes aka semi legends: Cantona, Neville, Robson, Copell, Beckham, Ronaldo, Ferdinand, Vidic, VDS, Schmeichel, Keane.

Dave was a really good player, but nowhere near the guys mentioned above. A comparable player would be RvN. A unidemenssional player that joined us during our barren years. Only to be moved on when more rounded players became available.
 

Eternitiy

New Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2019
Messages
581
Legend for not leaving sooner. He could've easily jumped ship
The only reason he didn't leave was a bizarre paperwork error.

He would have been a Real Madrid player, and we would have had Keylor Navas as our keeper for the past five years.
 

manunited1919

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
3,580
Short memories. De Gea was the best keeper in the world for years. He and Neuer had no competition.
I love VDS and I think he was better for longer, but he was not the best in the world for as long as DDG was. He also played behind the best defence in the history of this club, and statistically one of the best club defences ever.

'hE iS a gOod shOt sToPpeR nOt a gOod goAlkeEpEr' as if we are talking about Brad Friedel ffs.

So Sir Alex, LVG and Jose are all idiots. Okay.
VDS was part of the reason we had one of the best defenses ever, he knew how to lead from the back and inspired confidence which was contagious. DDG doesn’t transmit confidence to his defense because he is too error prone.
 

Isotope

Ten Years a Cafite
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
23,627
Top 3 of greatest United Gk. 434 games and counting for us. A total pro in his 10+ years with us. That should be enough as a legend.
 

edcunited1878

Full Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2014
Messages
8,935
Location
San Diego, CA
He's not a legend when you put him side by side of the two best GK in PL era history who just happened to play for United. Even if they played with better defenses than DDG, they are still the better GKs. And that's okay. He has been a top top player for United and was a world class player for a good run. Won the league, both domestic cups, and a European cup with United. Fantastic player for United.
 

Tarrou

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
25,637
Location
Sydney
I don't think he is but his performances have been good enough, he was just unfortunate to have been at his peak when we were absolute shit

If he'd been in a Fergie team for 5/6 years he'd have enough trophies to warrant the status

If he turns his form around and wins a couple of major trophies from here, I'd put him there
 

Isotope

Ten Years a Cafite
Joined
Mar 6, 2012
Messages
23,627
Bryan Robson didn't win that much trophies with us either. His two PL titles was at the end of his career with us, when he was riddled with injuries.
 

Invictus

Poster of the Year 2015 & 2018
Staff
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
15,259
Supports
Piracy on the High Seas.
Voted no with a heavy heart. David is without a doubt the greatest United player of the post-Fergie era but falls just a bit short of All-Time legendary stature for the club, I reckon — unless you expand the category to include over a couple dozen players across all positions and adulterate the significance of the term. When I think of legendary goalkeepers for a specific club the likes of Casillas (who was a testament to the institution of Madrid as well as an exquisite performer), Gregg (worse off than De Gea as a pure goalkeeper but an absolute legend because of heroics during the Munich air disaster) or Ceni (gave 20+ years to São Paulo and served as team captain for 700+ matches) come to mind.

An obviously brilliant player who enjoyed an extended stint as a world-class performer (where he was either the best or the second best goalkeeper in club football behind Neuer), saved our bacon on innumerable occasions and gave his peak-performance years to United, but all things considered David is not a mythical/transcendental figure who will reverberate through the ages from a narrative standpoint, and there's a noticeable gulf between him and bona fide legends like Charlton, Giggs, Best or Scholes.

Would readily include him in the great or semi-legend tier, though...in the company of van Nistelrooy, for example — intuitively, that category makes the most sense for him as while both he and Ruud were tremendous individuals (and among the very best in the world at the peak of their powers), there's a certain je ne sais quoi lacking in their United resumé; it's not even about “winning”, for what it's worth — think of the cometh-the-hour romance associated with Gregg, the maniacal leadership of Keane, the bravado and influence of Robson, or the charismatic genius of Cantona — standout qualities that made them more than just top, top performers in individual terms, and pushed them into the legendary tier.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,764
Location
india
Voted no with a heavy heart. David is without a doubt the greatest United player of the post-Fergie era but falls just a bit short of All-Time legendary stature for the club, I reckon — unless you expand the category to include over a couple dozen players across all positions and adulterate the significance of the term. When I think of legendary goalkeepers for a specific club the likes of Casillas (who was a testament to the institution of Madrid as well as an exquisite performer), Gregg (worse off than De Gea as a pure goalkeeper but an absolute legend because of heroics during the Munich air disaster) or Ceni (gave 20+ years to São Paulo and served as team captain for 700+ matches) come to mind.

An obviously brilliant player who enjoyed an extended stint as a world-class performer (where he was either the best or the second best goalkeeper in club football behind Neuer), saved our bacon on innumerable occasions and gave his peak-performance years to United, but all things considered David is not a mythical/transcendental figure who will reverberate through the ages from a narrative standpoint, and there's a noticeable gulf between him and bona fide legends like Charlton, Giggs, Best or Scholes.

Would readily include him in the great or semi-legend tier, though...in the company of van Nistelrooy, for example — intuitively, that category makes the most sense for him as while both he and Ruud were tremendous individuals (and among the very best in the world at the peak of their powers), there's a certain je ne sais quoi lacking in their United resumé; it's not even about “winning”, for what it's worth — think of the cometh-the-hour romance associated with Gregg, the maniacal leadership of Keane, the bravado and influence of Robson, or the charismatic genius of Cantona — standout qualities that made them more than just top, top performers in individual terms, and pushed them into the legendary tier.
What's your take on Rooney and Ronaldo?

I find it impossible to define to be honest. Usually, I think someone like Ronaldo who spent his best years at Madrid, is not a United legend. Whereas Rooney who is our record goalscorer and arguably the biggest overall contributor in our 5 titles and 1 CL (and 2 finals) in 7 years incredible run has to be. But United fans generally have a bit of a unending crush on Ronaldo whereas Rooney tends to get no love. So is it contribution or peak level or how iconic the player was or the fan affection towards them? I really don't know. It probably depends on how wide a net one wants to have.
 

Nicolarra90

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 14, 2017
Messages
1,330
What's your take on Rooney and Ronaldo?

I find it impossible to define to be honest. Usually, I think someone like Ronaldo who spent his best years at Madrid, is not a United legend. Whereas Rooney who is our record goalscorer and arguably the biggest overall contributor in our 5 titles and 1 CL (and 2 finals) in 7 years incredible run has to be. But United fans generally have a bit of a unending crush on Ronaldo whereas Rooney tends to get no love. So is it contribution or peak level or how iconic the player was or the fan affection towards them? I really don't know. It probably depends on how wide a net one wants to have.
I said it some time ago.

I think Rooney definitely is, and Ronaldo isn't, but he could be if he came back and retired here, whether winning a PL or not.
 

MinGin

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2020
Messages
584
He should be legend!! He carried us after post-Sir Alex era (2013-2018) and although he considered to leave and he cloud be easier to find more competitive clubs but he still stayed (for many reasons), served and saved us in the dark period as a one of the best GK in the world and only world class player in the team to make the team to a competitive position.
 

Invictus

Poster of the Year 2015 & 2018
Staff
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
15,259
Supports
Piracy on the High Seas.
What's your take on Rooney and Ronaldo?

I find it impossible to define to be honest. Usually, I think someone like Ronaldo who spent his best years at Madrid, is not a United legend. Whereas Rooney who is our record goalscorer and arguably the biggest overall contributor in our 5 titles and 1 CL (and 2 finals) in 7 years incredible run has to be. But United fans generally have a bit of a unending crush on Ronaldo whereas Rooney tends to get no love. So is it contribution or peak level or how iconic the player was or the fan affection towards them? I really don't know. It probably depends on how wide a net one wants to have.
Ooh, I have trouble categorizing them too, but looking back at their United careers (with the caveat that this is not a carefully considered opinion)...
  • Rooney has to be there, warts and all. Spent 13 years at the club...giving us the full scope of his peak, almost always left his all on the pitch, an archetypal United player in terms of vigor and application and selflessness, an imperfect but effective leader, a tireless worker for the most part, an inspirational/galvanizing presence on the field, All-Time leading scorer, highest assist-maker of the Premier League era after Giggs — while I obviously wouldn't dare to put him in the same class as Charlton or Scholes...who had close to perfect resumés, he has too much going in his favor from an objective standpoint to not be included in the broader legend tier.
  • Cristiano has to be there as well, if only towards the end of the legend category. His stature can definitely be contested because he departed too early and didn't give us the majority of his best years, and seemed totally enamored with Madrid in the death throes of his United tenure — but someone who was arguably the best player in club history in terms of distilled performance, arguably the best entertainer after Best, and spear-headed the advent of Fergie's third great team (following a somewhat gloomy period where it seemed like Abramovich's Chelsea would institute a hegemony in English football) while becoming only the fourth United player to win a Ballon D'Or should be there or thereabouts?
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,764
Location
india
Ooh, I have trouble categorizing them too, but looking back at their United careers (with the caveat that this is not a carefully considered opinion)...
  • Rooney has to be there, warts an all. Spent 13 years at the club...giving us the full scope of his peak, almost always left his all on the pitch, an archetypal United player in terms of vigor and application and selflessness, an imperfect but effective leader, a tireless worker for the most part, an inspirational/galvanizing presence on the field, All-Time leading scorer, highest assist-maker of the Premier League era after Giggs — while I obviously wouldn't dare to put him in the same class as Charlton or Scholes...who had close to perfect resumés, he has too much going in his favor from an objective standpoint to not be included in the broader legend tier.
  • Cristiano has to be there as well, if only towards the end of the legend category. His stature can definitely be contested because he departed too early and didn't give us the majority of his best years, and seemed totally enamored with Madrid in the death throes of his United tenure — but someone who was arguably the best player in club history in terms of distilled performance, arguably the best entertainer after Best, and spear-headed the advent of Fergie's third great team (following a somewhat gloomy period where it seemed like Abramovich's Chelsea would institute a hegemony in English football) while becoming only the fourth United player to win a Ballon D'Or should be there or thereabouts?
Thing is, there's such a wide spectrum of reasons to consider someone to be a legend. I'm wary of considering Ronaldo as one but he was hugely iconic for us without doubt. Then I see someone like Ole who is universally loved and considered as a legend but in terms of actual quality, we've had so many better. I mean, RVN was a better footballer as were the likes of Vidic, Evra, DDG etc They weren't "super subs" for us but they were giant pillars of us week in week out.

So it seems as though applying a metric is nearly impossible and in the end it's either a very wide net, or comes down to personal connect or memory.
 

Jim Beam

Gets aroused by men in low socks
Joined
Feb 10, 2017
Messages
13,085
Location
All over the place
When I say legend I think of Sir Bobby, Law, Best, Scholes, Giggs and even Rooney to a certain extent. Does DDG come close to any of these guys? Nope

Than we have cult heroes aka semi legends: Cantona, Neville, Robson, Copell, Beckham, Ronaldo, Ferdinand, Vidic, VDS, Schmeichel, Keane.
Cantona, Robson and Keane are indisputable to me and go there without thinking.

De gea (despite me voting yes) can be debatable and by my very own metric (ironically) in terms if you have a player that causes an actual debate among fans whether he is one or not, he doesn't go into that very top or indisputable one. The emotional connection that fans have with player would also be the most important one and not the sheer amount of trophies won.

By that metric: Edwards, Charlton, Best, Law, Robson, Cantona, Keane, Giggs, Scholes, Gregg

We might go with the tiers and then have something like a tier of great players and De Gea is there without any doubt.

The term is a subjective one for sure and in that sense everyone is absolutely right to point or add various players for different reason (Solskjaer to me also goes into above mentioned group). Also, if a specific player brought you to the club you will almost certainly look at him in that category.
 

MrBest

Full Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
2,837
Not legendary status, i don't want to devalue the word. I would say he was a cult hero, great servant, some great performances, but just not at the level of world class. I think his lack of vocals separate him from the legendary goalkeepers, he just does not have enough presence. He sometimes looks like a like child in our goal.
 

TrustInJanuzaj

'Liverpool are a proper club'
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
10,727
Not legendary status, i don't want to devalue the word. I would say he was a cult hero, great servant, some great performances, but just not at the level of world class. I think his lack of vocals separate him from the legendary goalkeepers, he just does not have enough presence. He sometimes looks like a like child in our goal.
At his peak he was absolutely world class. Best keeper in the premier league for 5/6 years and arguably the best in the world. That’s world class by most metrics.
 

Schmeichel's Cartwheel

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
Dec 21, 2014
Messages
11,420
Location
Manchester
Not really. I’d say icon. Legend for me is different. He didn’t really win anything here. I associate legends with trophies.

I have him on the same level as Teddy Sheringham. Not quite a legend, but a valued icon.
 

evil_geko

Full Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2005
Messages
5,912
Of course he is, No having more votes is showing how people quickly forget all the good you do in the past, a joke.
 

Zlatattack

New Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2017
Messages
7,374
No.

He has been an excellent player for us, but at Manchester United to be amongst our very best players ever - you have to achieve so much more.

Big Pete and VDS could both he considered club legends in the GK position because as well as being excellent goalkeepers, they were leaders at the back and integral parts of winning teams.

DDG arguably could be considered the best keeper of the three at his peak, but he's no leader and he's been unlucky not to have won more.
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,029
Location
Moscow
Alternatively he was a plucky underdog who rose to the occasion when expectations were low. And failed miserably when we were expected to win things. He let both his club and his country down so many times in knockout competitions when the pressure was on. The guy isn’t a winner. Never has had that mentality, never will.
When exactly were we expected to win things after Fergie left? I assume that you mean big titles?
 

Hughes35

Full Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2014
Messages
2,597
The disrespect to Ole is a joke.

Valencia? are you on crack??
It was a very thrown together list. Ole is a legend for me too.

As for Valencia. He made 241 premier league appearances for Utd with the following.

Manchester United


Individual
Puts him as a semi legend for me. Really good employee for the club and underrated.

Anyway. The thread is about Ge Gea and he's not top tier for me (Neither is Valencia).
 

Jim Beam

Gets aroused by men in low socks
Joined
Feb 10, 2017
Messages
13,085
Location
All over the place
Absolutely nothing to show for in European comps other than bottlejobs.
His performance at Bernabeu against Jose Madrid? The stage can't be much bigger than that and at the age of 23.

You could say that RVP not being at his usual level in that tie cost us going further (along with that Cakir cnut) or most likely to the semifinal as Madrid went to face Galatasaray in the next stage.

So, the only time he did have a very good team with Fergie on the bench he did deliver and in quite a brilliant manner.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
Not for me, i would pick Schmeichel and Van Der Sar over him all day long, true Manchester United goalkeeping legends.

Van Der Sar being the greatest Manchester United goalkeeper, Schmeichel whilst great, but was a bit eccentric at times like Mavarick in Top Gun, whilst Van Der Sar was like Iceman, calm/everything by the book/zero mistakes.

De Gea (at his best) was a good shot stopper, but was never someone you could fully trust on corners, almost never saves a penalty and always likes to punch the ball too much for my liking and there's always a mistake in him.
That just isn't true. Van Der Sar made more than his fair share of mistakes both at United and before that too. They just tend to get punished and remembered less when you play in an excellent team that's capable of winning regardless.
 

LovelyLittlePanda

New Member
Joined
May 23, 2015
Messages
366
Supports
Feyenoord
Yes! He was our best player for an extended period and top 3 in the world at one point. You can't hold it against him that we didn't win many prizes. If people at smaller clubs that never win anything did, they wouldn't have any club legends.

He singlehandedly won us so many points in those LVG years, we'd have been on the right side of the table if we had the same level of mediocrity in goal as we did in midfield.