hobbers
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2013
- Messages
- 29,869
Better the devil you know than the moron you also know.
If only someone had told that to those pinpointed in the Forde report.It is this kind of attitude that will give Tories a win at the next election. Remember you are not voting for Starmer, you are voting for Labour and their approach to supporting and governing the country.
As i understand it, he's effectively saying he has no faith in Keir Starmer or his Labour party.Not really, it’s rightly directed to you. You might not like Kier, but you’re effectively saying you prefer a conservative government rather than a Kier led Labour government. It makes no sense at all, if your underlying beliefs are left Labour, because even a Kier led Labour Party aligns more to that than a Conservative one. So I still don’t know what you’re achieving.
I think you’re all missing the point. When a viable candidate comes up who better fits your agenda, then you definitely should vote for them. But until then, I genuinely don’t understand the logic because the reality is someone has to govern after the next general election. Which means by not voting, or not voting Labour, you’re de facto strengthening conservative chances. Unless you think Starmer’s Labour is as bad or worse than a conservative government, I’m not sure that approach makes sense.As i understand it, he's effectively saying he has no faith in Keir Starmer or his Labour party.
The fact our political system is broken doesn't mean you have to vote for Labour or Conservative for ever. The parties can't take that for granted. This happened to the Tories when they lost circa 1 million votes to UKIP and to Labour in Scotland with the SNP.
Maybe Keir should add PR as a Labour policy. Maybe he should actually have some progressive policies.
You're well beyond ruined.I am terrified that Liz Truss will win this regardless of what she says and how unbelievably stupid she is.
She would be even worse/ more dangerous than Johnson and all because the Tory membership can’t bring itself to vote for someone that isn’t white.
We will be ruined by a minority bunch of racist shits.
Well I hope she breaks both her fecking legs doing it.You're well beyond ruined.
Kicking a dead horse is all she will be doing.
Yes, that is a dark stain on Labour and they need to sort it out. It shouldn't stop people voting for them. If you are not a tory, you should vote for whichever non Tory party has the best chance of winning in your constituency. I am a Labour supporter but if the greens or lib dems poll high enough in my area I will lend them my vote.If only someone had told that to those pinpointed in the Forde report.
But that’s exactly what you’ve said? You’ve accused anyone of not voting for Keir to be supporting the conservatives.I do understand that. And I agree. But there is a bigger picture here. Not voting will lead to a government which is even further away than what you’re looking for. That’s not to say you should flat out vote them no matter what, but it’s also not the right approach to think of it in isolation.
I just want to point out that turning 360 degrees means you haven't turned at all.Never voted Conservatives. I never will.
Although my life has changed 360 degrees I will never forget my roots. The only time I have not voted for Labour was when Blair turned rogue.
Well no, we were already ruined by a (very large) selfish minority when 40-odd% of the adult population gave themselves yet another collective lobotomy and voted for "Get Brexit Dumb". This is just all the poisons that lurked in the mud hatching out.I am terrified that Liz Truss will win this regardless of what she says and how unbelievably stupid she is.
She would be even worse/ more dangerous than Johnson and all because the Tory membership can’t bring itself to vote for someone that isn’t white.
We will be ruined by a minority bunch of racist shits.
Quite honestly at this stage the system has shown itself to be so corrupt that the binary choice isn't the bigger picture anymore. At some point you have to risk a bad outcome to cause change and refuse to be blackmailed.I do understand that. And I agree. But there is a bigger picture here. Not voting will lead to a government which is even further away than what you’re looking for. That’s not to say you should flat out vote them no matter what, but it’s also not the right approach to think of it in isolation.
My only hope is she is so bad, and she will be, that the Tory party implodes a bit like 1997, but I worry about how much irreparable damage she might do before that.Well no, we were already ruined by a (very large) selfish minority when 40-odd% of the adult population gave themselves yet another collective lobotomy and voted for "Get Brexit Dumb". This is just all the poisons that lurked in the mud hatching out.
She also might not last the term until the end of 2024 anyway of course. The ultimate King Log, but there's some seriously difficult times ahead for her you'd suspect.
I haven’t said that. If there was a viable left opposition other than Starmer, then by all means voting them makes absolute sense.But that’s exactly what you’ve said? You’ve accused anyone of not voting for Keir to be supporting the conservatives.
The party has behaved horrifically towards anyone on the left as is being evidenced by the Forde Report (not that anyone is in the slightest surprised by any of the details) but you’re now telling those people to suck it up and support somebody who was A) complicit with that and B) who’s ‘policies’ are at odds with their beliefs and C) has already proven himself to be extremely untrustworthy by going back on literally every pledge he made to become leader!
As mentioned on the previous page, it’s highly unlikely that I don’t vote for them because my local MP is great, but it would entirely be in spite of Keir and his centre right chums leading the party. If Keir crashes and burns at the election I won’t be happy that the tories won, but I won’t be sad to see back of him in the slightest.
I no doubt agree with the principle. The problem is, I don’t agree with the idea of losing would actually lead to change. An extreme example but look at the US. Let’s for argument say the left wing democrats who were disillusioned by Hilary and the centre part of the party ended up costing her VS Trump. Has it gotten better for them? Is it even better now that a democrat is in? I personally think where we are right now, the entire populous base has moved right wards because of division and very right leaders in recent times across the world. Before we can think about having the left policies we desire, you need to first reset that.Quite honestly at this stage the system has shown itself to be so corrupt that the binary choice isn't the bigger picture anymore. At some point you have to risk a bad outcome to cause change and refuse to be blackmailed.
The alternative in a two party state should be representative it shouldn't be self-constrained by none democratic forces working against itself.
I'll vote Labour if their policies meet my expectations OR if they push PR. If they lose it's on them for not being 'electable'.
Absolutely a concern yes. On the other hand it depends how she defines "EU-derived laws". REACH legislation for example has already been replaced by "UK REACH" which is basically a pointless duplication so far, and if it ever stops being a pointless duplicate then it will double the workload for anyone who wants to export chemicals or other products to the EU. It has already increased complication by creating confusion in how things should be certified but could nonetheless be argued to be either an "EU-derived law" or a "British law" depending on what bullshit you want to sell.My only hope is she is so bad, and she will be, that the Tory party implodes a bit like 1997, but I worry about how much irreparable damage she might do before that.
the ripping up of the EU laws she has already proposed (for the Tory base and not necessarily because she or anyone with a modicum of sense can actually believe is a good thing) and all the environmental protections that will go with that are a good example.
A party has to gain and deserve a vote. They don't just get it by default.I think you’re all missing the point. When a viable candidate comes up who better fits your agenda, then you definitely should vote for them. But until then, I genuinely don’t understand the logic because the reality is someone has to govern after the next general election. Which means by not voting, or not voting Labour, you’re de facto strengthening conservative chances. Unless you think Starmer’s Labour is as bad or worse than a conservative government, I’m not sure that approach makes sense.
Edited for accuracy. Sadly.I hope he launches some serious policies before the next GE
It’s like two successors to Hitler in 1940 arguing over who will send more Jews to Madagascar.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
That's an attack? Look at this dumb bitch, she supports human rights lawyers?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
You don't want some secret elitist old men in suits dictating how you live your life, do you?! We're all smart enough to decide how we should exist without rules being forced on us...That's an attack? Look at this dumb bitch, she supports human rights lawyers?
Genuinely the weirdest attack I’ve ever heard. I can’t believe this is where we are.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Liz Truss is useless and will lose the next general election.
Truss leading them into an election will be hilarious.
As will Truss trying to unite the various factions of the party.
Sit back and enjoy.
Correct, but the members will pick Truss and lose the next election.
Truss will be a disasterclass in front of the electorate everywhere.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Bizarro times we live in.That's an attack? Look at this dumb bitch, she supports human rights lawyers?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date