Bulldog United
New Member
Exactly it is debatable based on which angle you wish to most trust.
Exactly it is debatable based on which angle you wish to most trust.
I've heard from a reliable source, they can play just about anywhere.Can they play in midfield 2?
Wish it ended that wayTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
No it's not, I'm just mocking everyone drawing tape and taking pictures. The ball was in during the game and that's what counts.Exactly it is debatable based on which angle you wish to most trust.
Fair enough I misunderstood your original point.That's the point i was making?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Outstanding wum.Exactly it is debatable based on which angle you wish to most trust.
Costa Rica going through on -5 goal differenceWish it ended that way
You must be trolling.Exactly it is debatable based on which angle you wish to most trust.
It's a sphere.. every point on the surface is the farthest pointIs the rule whether the surface of the ball is out or it's farthest point?
Who cares, if they finish second they deserve to go through.Costa Rica going through on -5 goal difference
So cultured.
It's not debatable, you just don't understand how geometry works. If an angle slightly on the left shows the ball in, it was even more in in reality. According to the rules of the game, THE BALL WAS IN, stop pretending it's "debatable".Exactly it is debatable based on which angle you wish to most trust.
All of the ball has to be over the line, there must be a visible gap between the edge of ball and the line.Is the rule whether the surface of the ball is out or it's farthest point?
Someone needs to knock Netherlands out. I can’t have them boring us all the way to the final. It’ll end up a repeat of 2010 final.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I'm not trolling. It's my view and being debated all over social media. Its just an opinion though.You must be trolling.
I admitted that about geometry in my first reply.It's not debatable, you just don't understand how geometry works. If an angle slightly on the left shows the ball in, it was even more in in reality. According to the rules of the game, THE BALL WAS IN, stop pretending it's "debatable".
0 points for him, and his country
Fair playThat's the point i was making?
But there's not a debate to be had.I'm not trolling. It's my view and being debated all over social media. Its just an opinion though.
I admitted that about geometry in my first reply.
Can we debate the shape of the Earth next?But there's not a debate to be had.
Let it go then, according the laws of football, the ball was in, that was a good call, end of the story. You trying to explain why it was great before because we took some wrong decision based on wrong angles is a bit absurd.I'm not trolling. It's my view and being debated all over social media. Its just an opinion though.
I admitted that about geometry in my first reply.
BanterSo cultured.
That's not a good look for the competition. Leaves a bad taste in your mouth.
Well I gave my honest arguments. I'm sorry if I'm really dumb. The fact I am agreeing with Souness was probably the first clue.But there's not a debate to be had.
Don't worry about it, things like this plagued astronomers for centuries with the positions of celestial bodies.Well I gave my honest arguments. I'm sorry if I'm really dumb. The fact I am agreeing with Souness was probably the first clue.
They were beaten tonight for one and only one reason. Once they knew Germany only lead by goal they orchestrated a narrow loss to avoid Brasil in the quarters and get rid of a competitor.Still have a sneaky feeling they might make the final. Obviously they can be beat as they just were tonight but as horrible as they can be to watch it must be demoralizing to play against a team that barely gives you any possession.
The homophobia in the replies is quite depressing. Especially the vindication that gay people are destroying humanity.
Who even is this bloke?
Funnier thing to me is Da Vinci, Alan Turing, Erdos and arguably Newton was gay.The homophobia in the replies is quite depressing. Especially the vindication that gay people are destroying humanity.
Feck me.
Not really relevant, we just need to respect his views.Who even is this bloke?
Less funny that Turing was chemically castrated for sodomyFunnier thing to me is Da Vinci, Alan Turing, Erdos and arguably Newton was gay.
Literally people that shaped the whole modern world with huge scientific breakthroughs.