Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.

estel_manutd

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 28, 2020
Messages
199
Location
USA
@Adam-Utd @TheReligion @Ian Reus @Red in STL : I acknowledge that I sound unhinged, but I truly believe that the Glazers will hold on to us if they can: I recall pretty well-sourced reporting last year about how they like prestige associated with owning us. I also believe that we cannot be successful under the Glazers (both Ineos and Qatar would be much better owners). If we lose tomorrow's final, and go on a poor run of form in the lague, the pressure to sell will only increase. I think that trade-off is completely rational.
 

glazed

Eats diamonds to beat thermodynamics
Joined
Sep 30, 2012
Messages
7,871
Qatar and Glazers playing chicken. Qatar will win because Glazers won't get a better offer ever.
 

Appletonred

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 15, 2023
Messages
485
Qatar will get this over the line eventually, no logical reason for the glazers to preside any longer over the asset they have virtually stripped bare, they are pretty much done, not taken in by the emotional attachment from Avram attending the game tomorrow, pure posturing, if there was any emotional attachment to Utd he would have looked to sell the club a long time ago.
 

AneRu

Full Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
3,247
But this is how it’s done, just because bids have been made in no way means they have to except the bid. It’s also not flip flopping like a teenager. They asked Reine to see what the possibilities were and they’ve done that. Ineos value United at a certain price and the Qatari value it at a certain price and are serious buyers.

Its always been said their main target was outside investment. The opportunity is there for that now. I hope it isn’t the case and they do sell, but I’m not getting my hopes up. They’ve clearly maximised the profits from United in its current state and only way to improve on that is major investment.

Anyway United will still probably be worth 5bil in 4 years time or even more if they get the investment in. Talk of a rejuvenated super league, new Tv rights, hopefully a successful team, their is more money to be milked out of United yet.

As for false down, for me this team is already looking a million times better than what Ole and Jose produced. We might win nothing this season but given the style and ability of the team now for me it’s surpassed the level of the Europa and finishing 2nd.

We might lose tomorrow but from what I’ve seen this team isn’t far away from properly competing for big titles so again with an investment firm offering what they are, why would they sell. They’d probably be stupid to really.

Hopefully they are just more fed up with the hatred and stuff put towards them and would rather just sell for personal reasons. Here‘s hoping they do sell, because like I said this team already looks like it’ll be in a position soon to be a European threat.
If I am in their shoes I wouldn't sell for 4.5b either but raise it to 6-7b then maybe. An NBA without as much brand power sold for nearly that figure so they would be right to expect significantly more.

The thing with all the revenue generators you think will increase value is that you discount wage and transfer fee inflation, the players' wages will simply rise to match the rate at which tv revenue grows. Our financials won't support a +£6b valuation for a long time and as soon as all oil states buy up available clubs you'd be hardpressed to find anyone willing to throw billions at a football team.

It will be interesting to know the number of bidders who went in for the full buy out. If its the only two we know of then thats indicative of how difficult it will be, at any time, to generate valautions higher than these ones.

The looming regulations will also make it more difficult than it is now to sell to leveraged buyers or parties with state links. This will limit the pool of available buyers, they anticipated an auction which never came to fruition and soon there could be limiting regulations not only to their ambitions for a huge sale but to how they operate - what if the Football Regulator gives a fan representative veto power on key decisions or if they force a 50+1 ownership model?
 

TrebleChamp99

Supports Liverpool
Joined
Dec 27, 2021
Messages
1,166
First rule of negotiations, never accept the first offer.

Nothing to see here.

We will have two or three rounds of these kind of tactics, I believe there was a report the Qataris needed more time and a summer takeover was more likely from the offset.

Strap in.
 

UpWithRivers

Full Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2013
Messages
3,699
First rule of negotiations, never accept the first offer.

Nothing to see here.

We will have two or three rounds of these kind of tactics, I believe there was a report the Qataris needed more time and a summer takeover was more likely from the offset.

Strap in.
First rule of negotiations is dont ring up reporters and tell them everything that's going on. The media are full of sht
 

Chief123

Full Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2013
Messages
12,787
I’m not bought into the idea Glazers might be changing their mind because we look like we might be hitting some “success”. Financially, it doesn’t make a huge difference if you win the league or come 4th. I vaguely remember it was a difference of about £20m. The key was to just ensure you get champions league football. £5bn is a heck of a lot of years of success and profitable commercial business to try and make it worthwhile staying. Yes they might be gambling on the value of the business going up in the future but that is unlikely to happen unless there’s some investment to help raise that value with some success on the pitch.

It’s still highly likely they will go. They were never going to say yes to any first offer. Nor were the Qataris expecting their first offer to be accepted.
 

7even

Resident moaner, hypocrite and moron
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
4,223
Location
Lifetime vacation
The Glazers will sell the club because they have no other realistic financial option. Neither the remaining siblings or MU can handle another two billion of loans in today’s economical climate.

One likely reason the Glazers is sending out partly conflicting and irrational hints to the media is because they have discovered that there’s only one serious offer on the table. Without two public bidders that’s willing to close the deal it’s unlikely that there will be a significant increase in Qatars final offer.

From the Qataris perspective the best thing to do is to just sit still and await the sellers next move. As in most negotiation processes then silence and time is the buyers best friend.
 

Ottawa MLS Fan

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 4, 2013
Messages
127
What if the potential buyers just buy out the other Glazers? How much would they have and how would that work in terms of control?

Could they not marginalise Avram and Joel?
No, unfortunately, because the Glazer’s shares have 10x the votes of the rest of the shares, but when they sell them, they revert to ordinary shares. So, buying out the other Glazers would get you a higher percentage of the shares than Avram and Joel, but they could still out vote you, even if the other Shareholders voted with you.
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
29,124
No bidder was going to put their first offer at anything close to the $6bn the Glazers seem to want.
 

red thru&thru

Full Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
7,657
How anyone can't see this is negotiating is beyond me.
What we have to appreciate is, a lot of people have never needed to negotiate deals of any significance. Also, people aren't very good with money.

People will go off what they read/hear. And any kind of negativity will always be more reliable to them, as it's human nature to be more fearful and not get hurt.
 

Roboc7

Full Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2014
Messages
6,739
You don’t go through this public process to then try and buy out the other shareholders unless you’re dumb. Essentially you’ve shown them exactly what their shares are worth and that people are willing to pay that price for them.

Borrowing is also extremely expensive now and as that’s only way Joel and Avram get hold of more shares so it’s a terrible time to be publicly inflating the price. Any further significant borrowing can’t go on the club, you either sell off assets or take on extremely risky debt that makes it more likely you’ll lose it all then make any extra money.

There’s a good chance a number of the siblings have wanted out and were hanging on or persuaded to hang on for the ESL. Darcy and Bryan are 2nd and 3rd largest shareholders, they’ve held onto those shares for exactly this scenario. I don’t see what caveat there is for them to hang on because there’s no guarantee you got offered as much in 1,2,3 years let alone significantly more. Likewise the smallest shareholders don’t have a huge incentive to hold on, they only get 11 and 12% or any extra so again hard to see their incentive to hang on for a relatively small upside that isn’t even guaranteed.

Another big thing is we have 2 huge commercial deals in the short term. Kit sponsor now and kit manufacturer in two years, if you don’t hit both of those out of the park it just decreases appeal. The Glazers staying is much higher risk the reward.

They are posturing which is exactly what would expect them to do. The biggest risk to them not selling is greed and in fighting not outside and investment. It’s conceivable they won’t be able to agree and this will just drag on indefinitely or be revisited very quickly.
 

LawCharltonBest

Enjoys watching fox porn
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,695
Location
Salford
Yeah but this is the Glazers. Of course there’s going to be doubt they’ll actually go.

They never fecking go.

Really hope the anti Glazer chanting is loud, clear and constant tomorrow
 

HarryP

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 28, 2021
Messages
400
How anyone can't see this is negotiating is beyond me.
Yeah true, it's rule #1 of negotiating - let the other side know you're prepared to walk away if you don't get what you want. If you send a message that you'll sell at all costs then buyers will obviously low ball and wait it out.
 

Solius

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Staff
Joined
Dec 31, 2007
Messages
87,383
This bollocks plus being nervous about tomorrow has made today a bit rubbish. Just want to get on with it all.
 

Coops73

Full Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2013
Messages
3,353
@Adam-Utd @TheReligion @Ian Reus @Red in STL : I acknowledge that I sound unhinged, but I truly believe that the Glazers will hold on to us if they can: I recall pretty well-sourced reporting last year about how they like prestige associated with owning us. I also believe that we cannot be successful under the Glazers (both Ineos and Qatar would be much better owners). If we lose tomorrow's final, and go on a poor run of form in the lague, the pressure to sell will only increase. I think that trade-off is completely rational.
I feel sick saying it but I’d take it if it meant getting them cnuts out. It feels like this is such a pivotal moment for our club.
 

Mainoldo

New Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
22,965
I feel sick saying it but I’d take it if it meant getting them cnuts out. It feels like this is such a pivotal moment for our club.
Let’s all stop drinking silly juice now.

The team always comes first b
 

Coops73

Full Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2013
Messages
3,353
Let’s all stop drinking silly juice now.

The team always comes first b
So you would take a moments glory over our long term future? I find this kind of thinking bizarre.

Im not saying that whoever takes over the club will be the right one but I’m pretty sure the Glazers aren’t and with them in charge and inevitably more debt to keep them there we’d be fecked.
 

Mainoldo

New Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
22,965
So you would take a moments glory over our long term future? I find this kind of thinking bizarre.

Im not saying that whoever takes over the club will be the right one but I’m pretty sure the Glazers aren’t and with them in charge and inevitably more debt to keep them there we’d be fecked.
I find the concept of hey let’s just mess up our season so the Glazer will leave as silly as, hey don’t worry we aren’t spending in January But we will be sold in the summer. So again where does this stop?

If they stay or leave it will have nothing to do with winning the League cup. So just back the team and let the the ownership run it’s course.
 

Fluctuation0161

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2016
Messages
8,191
Location
Manchester
I see many people are okay with United becoming a circus again (ETH finally got rid of the circus and United are an actual team, for now) and slowly turning into a plastic club like PSG and City. Everything about the Qatari bidder sounds shady as feck and people are okay with it, leave morality aside and actually think about who the guy is, what connections he does or doesn't have with the Qatari ruling family, what other connections he has, much finance he has, who backs him, how will he run the club, etc. People are completely ignoring the cons and focusing only on the pros.
Spot on.
 

Coops73

Full Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2013
Messages
3,353
I find the concept of hey let’s just mess up our season so the Glazer will leave as silly as, hey don’t worry we aren’t spending in January But we will be sold in the summer. So again where does this stop?

If they stay or leave it will have nothing to do with winning the League cup. So just back the team and let the the ownership run it’s course.
feck me really? I’m backing the team obviously it’s a hypothetical question.
 

Rightnr

Wants players fined for winning away.
Joined
Jan 25, 2015
Messages
14,764
Even if I want to doom, I just cannot even imagine how they engineer their stay.

They need huge money for renovation/new stadium but also to pay off their 4 other siblings that want out. Both of these should cost £4bn or even more. Unless the siblings are happy to stay in and dilute their ownership to fund the stadium rebuild, even £1bn more of debt would absolutely cripple us.
 

Tiber

Full Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Messages
10,307
Qatar needs to come in with silly money and force the Glazers out. Goldman Sachs will only allow Ratcliffe to go to a certain limit
 

Anustart89

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
15,962
I see many people are okay with United becoming a circus again (ETH finally got rid of the circus and United are an actual team, for now) and slowly turning into a plastic club like PSG and City. Everything about the Qatari bidder sounds shady as feck and people are okay with it, leave morality aside and actually think about who the guy is, what connections he does or doesn't have with the Qatari ruling family, what other connections he has, much finance he has, who backs him, how will he run the club, etc. People are completely ignoring the cons and focusing only on the pros.
This thread wouldn't be almost 700 pages long if "many people completely ignored the cons" of the Qatari bid.
 

Blood Mage

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2019
Messages
6,269
God it will be a champagne day when these vultures finally leave. Qatar have already made the biggest bid ever for a sports team and they want to squeeze more out of them, I'd be surprised if they don't just tell them to get fecked.
 

nainaisson

Full Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2016
Messages
1,511
Location
Phantom Zone
The Glazers want their 6 gazillion dollars. They're going to cut off pieces of the club and mail them to the Qataris until they agree to cough up the dough.
 

tenpoless

No 6-pack, just 2Pac
Joined
Oct 20, 2014
Messages
16,523
Location
Ole's ipad
Supports
4-4-2 classic
INEOS are here to make money. I dont think theyd spend 6 bill. Qatar on the other hand... sees the club differently. Fecking greedy bastards milking the club till the very end.
 

RedDevilQuebecois

New Member
Joined
May 27, 2021
Messages
8,256
The Glazers want their 6 gazillion dollars. They're going to cut off pieces of the club and mail them to the Qataris until they agree to cough up the dough.
Alright, send Luca Brasi to me. I think we'll find a way to reason with this Mister...

Oops, wrong movie.:devil:
 

Irrational.

Full Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2011
Messages
32,996
Location
LVG's notebook
Those parasites will only be satisfied until they’ve milked the club dry of every last penny. Of course they’re not satisfied with getting a huge return on their investment into the billions.

Absolute leeches. Like a fecking limpet clinging to a rock. Absolutely pathetic - cannot wait until they feck off for good.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.