Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sviken

New Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2021
Messages
2,450
Gill gets the credit of basically allowing SAF to do whatever he wanted. Which was a no brainer considering how powerful SAF was.. He will always be linked with the value signings whom while being partly successful (ex Evra, Vidic and Carrick), in most cases it was not. Gill failed to tap United's full potential in terms of sponsors which made us more vulnerable to a take over. He also failed to push for the modernisation of the club (ex DOF etc) and he basically left behind a mess ie an ageing squad and a manager who has no clue what management at top level is. Its evident that the club had no contingency plan to when SAF was going to retire.

From a purely financial perspective Woodward was far better. He leveraged the debt on the Glazers behalf, he opened United to a whole world of sponsorships and he even managed to sell Carrington's name which is amazing considering that its located in the middle of nowhere. The guy was so good in his job that he was the only non Glazer allowed to own B class shares. Considering how greedy these leeches are then that's quite amazing.

What Woodward tanked big time was his inability to acknowledge the need to modernise the football side of the club. Its amazing that the Glazers were unable to notice that and had never pushed Woodward to seek tangible help on that part of their business. So many millions had been thrown in the bin because of that. However let's not kid ourselves. Gill didn't bother on modernising the football side as well. He was just happy to piggy bank on SAF with no care in the world what would happen once the ageing genius decided to call quits.
I don't know why Gill is praised. SAF was basically a dictator past the treble. He could do whatever he wanted.
 

George The Best

Full Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
2,077
Location
Nut Megging
I wonder what is the reason they are taking so long to do this? Like do they think making everyone wait will mean that someone will come up with a higher bid?

It's crazy to think that they have not received enough information already on what someone wants to pay.

Probably us normal people won't understand the 'complexity' of this deal, blah blah. But after six months, what are they actually doing here?
Would not be surprised if they are still trying to find another bidder. It gives me the impression they are still not satisfied with either bid on the table. That leads me to the one doubt I have about the bid from Qatar - if this is a state sponsored bid I think it would be wrapped up by now.
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,723
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
Would not be surprised if they are still trying to find another bidder. It gives me the impression they are still not satisfied with either bid on the table. That leads me to the one doubt I have about the bid from Qatar - if this is a state sponsored bid I think it would be wrapped up by now.
They don’t need another bidder. They’ve still got two active bidders. The Glazers know that time is their biggest tool now. It’s essentially a game of chicken and they are playing the two parties and waiting for one to bite and give what they want.

When one finally does bite and give them what they want then… they will see if the other can match it and if they can, what the Glazers want will increment a little higher.
 

Zed 101

Full Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2014
Messages
1,454
Smaller clubs are actually easier to manage then big clubs which is why the likes of Abu Dhabi and Saudi bought small clubs in the first place. One can buy a small club with a good fan base and great facilities (almost as good if not better to ours). On top of that the expectations are low, fans are ready to wait and a couple of good signings can be enough to paper the cracks and make the fan base happy. If they mess things up at the level of Nice and Lausanne then how on earth can they awake a sleeping giant whose got huge infrastructure and football issues and is competing in one of the toughest and most competitive leagues in football history?

The issue with Lausanne and Nice wasn't just in terms of investment (which was too low to meet the silly ambitions laid by SJR). The biggest issue was down to management. Take Lausanne as example. INEOS went there, they placed Bob Ratcliffe whose only football experience he had was coming from the same ball sack SJR came from and he messed it big time. What did SJR do? He moved him to Nice. Guess what happened next? He messed there as well. But that's not all. SJR ordered an audit. Guess who did the audit? You would presume that it came from an experienced football person right? Nope. The audit was made by bicycle man Brailsford whom in turn asked another genius Iain Moody as an advisor. While SJR was promising fans that they would be competing with PSG, the two idiots were busy buying every washed up player from the EPL. As if the likes of Ramsay, Pepe, Barkley and Schmeichel could go toe to toe with Messi, Neymar, Donnarumma and Mbappe. Do you think that Jimmy learnt from his mistakes? Of course not. Bobby Ratcliffe is head of football while cyclist man was part of SJR's inner core who visited Manchester United.

There's no doubt that as a business man SJR knows his stuff. However in football he's an absolute mess. Guess what? I support a football club not a petrochemical business.
Reads like FM to me but do not want to get into an argument about predicting a future which may not even be a possibility yet, so all power to ya, hope you get behind either new owners
 

Nori-

Full Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2015
Messages
1,184
I don't think the Qatari's falling out with the Raine Group has anything to do with dodgy finances. You are dealing with a bidder backed by a oil rich state. Neither will it have anything to do with the fit owners tests, Qatar have a great relationship with Britain.

My guess is the Qataris are used to dealing with people who give them quick answers and say yes to everything. The Raine Group negotiators have probably gotten to comfortable in their position and offended the Qataris in some way.

The Qataris have basically brushed them aside and said in a roundabout way, "We don't answer to you, you are just an employee, we will talk directly to the managers (Glazers)"
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,701
Reads like FM to me but do not want to get into an argument about predicting a future which may not even be a possibility yet, so all power to ya, hope you get behind either new owners
More like experience mate. My country is littered with small clubs and my hometown team is a very small club (although it has a great youth academy)
 

Rightnr

Wants players fined for winning away.
Joined
Jan 25, 2015
Messages
14,309
I don't think the Qatari's falling out with the Raine Group has anything to do with dodgy finances. You are dealing with a bidder backed by a oil rich state. Neither will it have anything to do with the fit owners tests, Qatar have a great relationship with Britain.

My guess is the Qataris are used to dealing with people who give them quick answers and say yes to everything. The Raine Group negotiators have probably gotten to comfortable in their position and offended the Qataris in some way.

The Qataris have basically brushed them aside and said in a roundabout way, "We don't answer to you, you are just an employee, we will talk directly to the managers (Glazers)"
Go, go ME Karens.
 

IncyWincySpider

Full Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2021
Messages
543
Must have been quite humiliating for the Qatar royal family, being outbid by a guy with a with nothing to his name but some second hand road bikes, a topper dinghy and a briefcase full of monopoly money.

No wonder they wanted to speak directly to the Glazers, they couldn't believe what they were hearing.
 

colombianmancunian

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 26, 2022
Messages
732
Having funds doesn't necessarily translate into hiring the best team, it can go either ways - how about PSG or more recently Chelsea? Any by that argument - Glazers spent money as well but didn't hire the best team (Woodward?). What makes you so sure Qatar will hire the best team?
PSG are still on a way better position than Nice.

I think Qatar will hire the best team at United for 2 reasons: first of all, to achieve the European success they haven’t been able to achieve with PSG. Second, because they understand they need they need the best available directives to challenge $hitty’s well oiled machine (pun intended).
 

whitbyviking

Full Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2022
Messages
2,358
I'd rather have an unknown with deep pockets rather then a proven clown who thinks that its a good idea to involve someone in cycling into football and who keeps messing up again and again. I mean it takes a whole level of stupidity to think that you can compete with PSG by adding the likes of Barkley, Ramsey, Pepe and Schmeichel to an already average lot.
The Qatari investment likely isn’t going to go how you think. I’d be surprised if they can spend any more than Ineos in the first seasons too.

Be careful what you wish for Boehly is the benchmark for bottomless pits of cash being shovelled into a team. How has that gone?
 

whitbyviking

Full Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2022
Messages
2,358
PSG are still on a way better position than Nice.

I think Qatar will hire the best team at United for 2 reasons: first of all, to achieve the European success they haven’t been able to achieve with PSG. Second, because they understand they need they need the best available directives to challenge $hitty’s well oiled machine (pun intended).
Ineoa have appointed the highly rated Blanc, ex PSG, to oversea sports, including their football clubs. They’ve taken the step in the right direction.

Qatar are talking about appointing “ex legends”. Whatever or whomever that means.

PSG appointed Mbappe as some sort of pseudo sports director and currently have fan protests over the owners.

Which sounds worse?
 

MackRobinson

New Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2017
Messages
5,134
Location
Terminal D
Supports
Football
The Qatari investment likely isn’t going to go how you think. I’d be surprised if they can spend any more than Ineos in the first seasons too.

Be careful what you wish for Boehly is the benchmark for bottomless pits of cash being shovelled into a team. How has that gone?
To add to that, bottomless pits of cash have diminishing returns. You can have all the money you want, but at the very top, picking the right manager and players separate the great teams from the good ones, not continually spending.
 

Strootman's Finger

New Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
1,661
Ineoa have appointed the highly rated Blanc, ex PSG, to oversea sports, including their football clubs. They’ve taken the step in the right direction.

Qatar are talking about appointing “ex legends”. Whatever or whomever that means.

PSG appointed Mbappe as some sort of pseudo sports director and currently have fan protests over the owners.

Which sounds worse?
One has Messi, Neymar, Mbappe and the other has Kasper Schmeichel, Ross Barkley and Aaron Ramsay. Not a hard choice.
 

Cloud7

Full Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
12,834
Day 182 of this thread and saga. What we know, in a nutshell:

1. Glazers are selling (most or all) their share in the club.
2. There's two bidders for majority, and a handful of others for minority.
3. The Glazers could sell all of their share, most of it, a minority of it, or pack it in.
4. The process is taking forever, and nobody (but them) really knows why.

The rest is pure speculation.
Solid summary. I would even argue that point 1 and 3 are a bit of speculation as well.

At this point we still have no idea what the Glazers actually want, if it's to sell all of their share, most of it, some of it or none of it and get outside investment.

We know nothing about where this process is.

This has been the perfect representation of the Glazers.
 

George The Best

Full Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
2,077
Location
Nut Megging
The Qatari investment likely isn’t going to go how you think. I’d be surprised if they can spend any more than Ineos in the first seasons too.

Be careful what you wish for Boehly is the benchmark for bottomless pits of cash being shovelled into a team. How has that gone?
We still don’t know if the Qatari investors have ‘bottomless pits of cash’ - that not yet proven. I agree they will be limited, by the rules and existing finances, on squad spending - but the pledge they have given to remove debt and invest in the infrastructure is just as important imo.
 

Brownie85

Mes que un muppet!
Joined
May 23, 2014
Messages
5,028
Location
Manchester
A good summary. Everything else really is just speculation.
I wonder if Champions League qualification is a factor in the Glazers delaying things? They obviously know if we qualify for CL we'd be a lot more attractive for sponsors etc, and they could then, at least, attempt to justify their 6bn price tag? If we fail to qualify for CL, surely the bidders could they say the club would be worth less than what they've already bid?

Not sure at all, just speculating, but if we secure qualification on Thursday, i imagine we'll hear stuff fairly soon
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,701
The Qatari investment likely isn’t going to go how you think. I’d be surprised if they can spend any more than Ineos in the first seasons too.

Be careful what you wish for Boehly is the benchmark for bottomless pits of cash being shovelled into a team. How has that gone?
I don't know what qatar will bring but we have a very good idea how ineos operate in football and there I'd absolutely nothing out of it that I like. Nice has no direction, little investment and even their youth academy kind of suck.
 

Ahriman

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 10, 2019
Messages
104
We still don’t know if the Qatari investors have ‘bottomless pits of cash’ - that not yet proven. I agree they will be limited, by the rules and existing finances, on squad spending - but the pledge they have given to remove debt and invest in the infrastructure is just as important imo.
Surely the way City are so beyond reproach indicates rules are only for the people that can't afford to challenge them. If Qatar buy the club, "rules" aren't going to stop us spending. It's like taxes, everyone is supposed to pay their dues but we all know if you got the right accountants, your "dues" are significantly less than they should be.
 

Godfather

Full Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
29,940
Location
Austria
Maybe b/c you really want Qatar to win *shrugs*
I'd call it a slight preference at this point but I'm not thrilled at either option. Both better than our current regime mind.

I do however think that the Ratcliffe camp tends to jump on reports more than the other way round. With quite ridiculous arguments at times.
 

We need an rvn

Full Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2015
Messages
3,871
Location
Down south...somewhere
One is obviously cheating, the other is not
City and Chelsea seem to be finding ways…join the gang or we’ll turn into Liverpool of the 90s-00’s etc.

Sadly that’s the way it is. Might be worth mentioning our monopoly in the late 90s /00s and I’m sure we twisted the rules a bit come signing players back in the past as well and now it’s just taken to an new level with offshore company sponsons / hidden wages etc.
 

George The Best

Full Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
2,077
Location
Nut Megging
Surely the way City are so beyond reproach indicates rules are only for the people that can't afford to challenge them. If Qatar buy the club, "rules" aren't going to stop us spending. It's like taxes, everyone is supposed to pay their dues but we all know if you got the right accountants, your "dues" are significantly less than they should be.
We don’t need to break rules if the debt is wiped and the infrastructure is invested in. Post take-over, if it happens, we will be under the most scrutiny of any club in the UK ever.
 

Nou_Camp99

what would Souness do?
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
10,274
Our uncertain CL status could well be holding up this deal. Obviously it's not certain yet we are there but it's looking very likely now.

All this stuff about the Glazers delaying and it could well be the bidders wanting to see which European competition we are going to be in before signing the final paperwork. Afterall the money disparity between the EL and CL is said to be significant.
 

Amarsdd

Full Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
3,299
I'd call it a slight preference at this point but I'm not thrilled at either option. Both better than our current regime mind.

I do however think that the Ratcliffe camp tends to jump on reports more than the other way round. With quite ridiculous arguments at times.
Like really? Have you read this thread?
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,754
Was there any word on when we should expect to hear what happens next following the most recent update (the new Qatar bid) ?

My feeling is that we'll be waiting until after the FA Cup final?
Yeah like others have already said it will most likely be then so there isn't much backlash
 

Mmm-Qatarian

Full Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2016
Messages
1,480
Based on that Tweet, I think we can all safely assume that Joel and Avram are staying on as majority owners and overlords of Manchester United.
 

UnitedSofa

You'll Never Walk Away
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Messages
6,793
Gill gets the credit of basically allowing SAF to do whatever he wanted. Which was a no brainer considering how powerful SAF was.. He will always be linked with the value signings whom while being partly successful (ex Evra, Vidic and Carrick), in most cases it was not. Gill failed to tap United's full potential in terms of sponsors which made us more vulnerable to a take over. He also failed to push for the modernisation of the club (ex DOF etc) and he basically left behind a mess ie an ageing squad and a manager who has no clue what management at top level is. Its evident that the club had no contingency plan to when SAF was going to retire.

From a purely financial perspective Woodward was far better. He leveraged the debt on the Glazers behalf, he opened United to a whole world of sponsorships and he even managed to sell Carrington's name which is amazing considering that its located in the middle of nowhere. The guy was so good in his job that he was the only non Glazer allowed to own B class shares. Considering how greedy these leeches are then that's quite amazing.

What Woodward tanked big time was his inability to acknowledge the need to modernise the football side of the club. Its amazing that the Glazers were unable to notice that and had never pushed Woodward to seek tangible help on that part of their business. So many millions had been thrown in the bin because of that. However let's not kid ourselves. Gill didn't bother on modernising the football side as well. He was just happy to piggy bank on SAF with no care in the world what would happen once the ageing genius decided to call quits.
DOF’s by Modernisation of the club in what? 2000’s and early 2010’s

DoF’s weren’t around then (& if they were they were a rarity,) if I remember correctly, living in fantasy land, he’s not mystic meg.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.