Tiber
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2014
- Messages
- 10,308
Faisal Islam said you know the deal is done when the shares hit 30. It reached almost 27 earlier and could spike again quickly
So you don't trust Mike Keegan either or RMC sport in France?I think I’d trust Reuters over any British sports journalists especially a ratcliffe mouthpiece.
Wow, Times going really hard in opposite direction here!
This isn't really news though. Deals take time to close.
Interesting, given that AFP, along with AP, and Reuters are pretty much viewed the same in terms of international credibility.
Yeah all the above is true and I can't really moan at it. I'm coming at it from a different viewpoint.Fair enough but most don't. I obviously won't change my allegiance now but I only knew of United's existence because they made the CL final in 1999.
Success not only is nice but also gets you new fans because of all the eyes on the club. They may or may not be glory hunters but what is undeniable is that it increases the popularity of the club which is generally considered good.
In any case, I won't gloat if Qatar do win but I also struggle with his sport is not about winning narrative. Sport is literally about competition where the winner is not hurt (except their pride).
Ok mate thanks for filling me in.They don;t care about that.
Its simply that they have contacts at Ineos, and none with the sheik's team.
When they have seemingly have a horse backedWhen do journalists like Matt Lawton and the Times ever make up shit? They are not the Sun or Daily Star.
It's not from RCMSport but AFP which are basically around the top of news agencies with AP.
The fact that this guy is attempting ascribe credibility based on how many social media followers an account has, as opposed to historical journalistic credibilty, is pretty tellingTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Well my opinion is that the British journalists are the ones who are wrong, and that's far more likely than reuters chief journalist for mergersand acquisitions making a report that was widely dismissed as both keegan and the times have claimedJournalists aren't infallible. They do occasionally jump the gun requiring later retractions, or else the situation in the story they are covering is so fluid that the result ends up being different from what was originally reported. This is why you wait for further confirmation.
The negotiations are confidential, taking place under a non-disclosure agreement. Who exactly are the likes of Keegan and Jacobs supposed to be getting info from within the negotiation room?They have football sources. This goes way higher than that.
its all the wording though. The Reuters report said they are discussing exclusivity not that its done, you can discuss it with "nothing new"Interesting, given that AFP, along with AP, and Reuters are pretty much viewed the same in terms of international credibility.
AFP and Reuters are comparable in terms of credibility and track record. Both globally recognized agencies (along with AP). AFP are apparently publishing something different from the earlier Reuters piece.When they have seemingly have a horse backed
Reuters don't and their report wasn't dismissed. If people read the article, it says they were discussing exclusivity and nobody really disputed that. Simon Stone said that it wasn't agreed, Reuters never said it was
Especially interesting that there is absolutely nothing officially published or on Twitter from AFPInteresting, given that AFP, along with AP, and Reuters are pretty much viewed the same in terms of international credibility.
To be fair that could mean anything. We really don’t know what the starting point is here. Could easily mean waiting on results of the exclusivity negotiations.
Agreed, financial publications and those that have ties to the stock market are better placed to guess. Who are Keegan, Lawton anyway? They’ve told us the grand sun of nothing fresh off the press since the process began. They even categorically stated SJ had placed a bid when he hadn’t. That should tell you all.Well my opinion is that the British journalists are the ones who are wrong, and that's far more likely than reuters chief journalist for mergersand acquisitions making a report that was widely dismissed as both keegan and the times have claimed
Attacking anyone having a different opinion is naive and stupid in the extreme. Let the process take its route. The fans can then decide from whatever different perspective or ethical standpoint they will carry on their support or otherwise.Its the personal attacks on journalists I find pathetic. I hope none of these posters ever voted for Boris...
Can’t find anything from themAFP and Reuters are comparable in terms of credibility and track record. Both globally recognized agencies (along with AP). AFP are apparently publishing something different from the earlier Reuters piece.
Trust Reuters with what exactly? They report based on their sources but do you actually think someone at the club or Raine officially confirmed anything to then?I trust Reuters in any story over The Times. Even if that story was what is happening in the News UK offices
Not really. From that tweet it sounds like AFP's source is someone in the Jassim camp, and that person is not revealing much. "Nothing to report" doesn't contradict anything we've heard.AFP and Reuters are comparable in terms of credibility and track record. Both globally recognized agencies (along with AP). AFP are apparently publishing something different from the earlier Reuters piece.
Check his timeline. Clearly an unbiased influencer.Who is this?
not really that different. Until negotiations are complete and exclusivity is granted, there is nothing newAFP and Reuters are comparable in terms of credibility and track record. Both globally recognized agencies (along with AP). AFP are apparently publishing something different from the earlier Reuters piece.
Yep, now it's interesting. If it's Reuters vs Times then it's Reuters every day. Reuters vs AFP then it's two heavyweightsAFP and Reuters are comparable in terms of credibility and track record. Both globally recognized agencies (along with AP). AFP are apparently publishing something different from the earlier Reuters piece.
You don't have to get that info from someone in the room - security/hotel staff etc. People see who meet and how long these meetings take etc.The negotiations are confidential, taking place under a non-disclosure agreement. Who exactly are the likes of Keegan and Jacobs supposed to be getting info from within the negotiation room?
The fact fans have to 'choose' if we are prepared to support the owners of the club is a shambles in the first place. It shouldn't be like this.Attacking anyone having a different opinion is naive and stupid in the extreme. Let the process take its route. The fans can then decide from whatever different perspective or ethical standpoint they will carry on their support or otherwise.
Discussing exclusivity is however a different thing than awaiting clarity which is what AFP published.its all the wording though. The Reuters report said they are discussing exclusivity not that its done, you can discuss it with "nothing new"
Doesn’t really matter who it is. The point stands regardless.Who is this?
It's Suhail the friendly ITK.Who is this?
Doubling down. Hard to see them doing that if they werent sure of their source.