Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tiber

Full Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Messages
10,308
Faisal Islam said you know the deal is done when the shares hit 30. It reached almost 27 earlier and could spike again quickly
 

Rhyme Animal

Thinks Di Zerbi is better than Pep.
Joined
Sep 3, 2015
Messages
11,193
Location
Nonchalantly scoring the winner...


Wow, Times going really hard in opposite direction here!

They must really truly believe this to be this bullish.

Maybe it’s Jim Rat ft The Glazers after all. If Glazers are staying in any capacity, they should really get moving on transfers and supporting ETH.

They’ll really need to win over the fans after this.
 

Utd heap

Models for Coin.
Joined
Aug 15, 2006
Messages
21,701
Fair enough but most don't. I obviously won't change my allegiance now but I only knew of United's existence because they made the CL final in 1999.

Success not only is nice but also gets you new fans because of all the eyes on the club. They may or may not be glory hunters but what is undeniable is that it increases the popularity of the club which is generally considered good.

In any case, I won't gloat if Qatar do win but I also struggle with his sport is not about winning narrative. Sport is literally about competition where the winner is not hurt (except their pride).
Yeah all the above is true and I can't really moan at it. I'm coming at it from a different viewpoint.
 

LARulz

Full Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
18,248
When do journalists like Matt Lawton and the Times ever make up shit? They are not the Sun or Daily Star.
When they have seemingly have a horse backed

Reuters don't and their report wasn't dismissed. If people read the article, it says they were discussing exclusivity and nobody really disputed that. Simon Stone said that it wasn't agreed, Reuters never said it was
 

jm99

New Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2011
Messages
4,667
Journalists aren't infallible. They do occasionally jump the gun requiring later retractions, or else the situation in the story they are covering is so fluid that the result ends up being different from what was originally reported. This is why you wait for further confirmation.
Well my opinion is that the British journalists are the ones who are wrong, and that's far more likely than reuters chief journalist for mergersand acquisitions making a report that was widely dismissed as both keegan and the times have claimed
 

MUFC OK

New Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Messages
7,216
They have football sources. This goes way higher than that.
The negotiations are confidential, taking place under a non-disclosure agreement. Who exactly are the likes of Keegan and Jacobs supposed to be getting info from within the negotiation room?
 

Tiber

Full Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Messages
10,308
Interesting, given that AFP, along with AP, and Reuters are pretty much viewed the same in terms of international credibility.
its all the wording though. The Reuters report said they are discussing exclusivity not that its done, you can discuss it with "nothing new"
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,815
Location
Hollywood CA
When they have seemingly have a horse backed

Reuters don't and their report wasn't dismissed. If people read the article, it says they were discussing exclusivity and nobody really disputed that. Simon Stone said that it wasn't agreed, Reuters never said it was
AFP and Reuters are comparable in terms of credibility and track record. Both globally recognized agencies (along with AP). AFP are apparently publishing something different from the earlier Reuters piece.
 

Godfather

Full Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
30,092
Location
Austria
Interesting, given that AFP, along with AP, and Reuters are pretty much viewed the same in terms of international credibility.
Especially interesting that there is absolutely nothing officially published or on Twitter from AFP
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
RMC INEOS mouthpieces?

To be fair that could mean anything. We really don’t know what the starting point is here. Could easily mean waiting on results of the exclusivity negotiations.
The simplest answer could be Reuters thinks they have someone who talked and the rest don’t and that’s where the difference lays
 

MUFC OK

New Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Messages
7,216
Well my opinion is that the British journalists are the ones who are wrong, and that's far more likely than reuters chief journalist for mergersand acquisitions making a report that was widely dismissed as both keegan and the times have claimed
Agreed, financial publications and those that have ties to the stock market are better placed to guess. Who are Keegan, Lawton anyway? They’ve told us the grand sun of nothing fresh off the press since the process began. They even categorically stated SJ had placed a bid when he hadn’t. That should tell you all.
 

Sultan

Gentleness adorns everything
Joined
Sep 1, 2004
Messages
48,569
Location
Redcafe
Its the personal attacks on journalists I find pathetic. I hope none of these posters ever voted for Boris...
Attacking anyone having a different opinion is naive and stupid in the extreme. Let the process take its route. The fans can then decide from whatever different perspective or ethical standpoint they will carry on their support or otherwise.
 

Godfather

Full Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
30,092
Location
Austria
AFP and Reuters are comparable in terms of credibility and track record. Both globally recognized agencies (along with AP). AFP are apparently publishing something different from the earlier Reuters piece.
Can’t find anything from them
 

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,660
I trust Reuters in any story over The Times. Even if that story was what is happening in the News UK offices
Trust Reuters with what exactly? They report based on their sources but do you actually think someone at the club or Raine officially confirmed anything to then?

The answer is obviously not as that would be illegal so again exactly what is the trust here? They ain't making shit up but it doesn't mean the story will always check out.
 

Big Ben Foster

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
13,344
Location
BR -> MI -> TX
Supports
Also support Vasco da Gama
AFP and Reuters are comparable in terms of credibility and track record. Both globally recognized agencies (along with AP). AFP are apparently publishing something different from the earlier Reuters piece.
Not really. From that tweet it sounds like AFP's source is someone in the Jassim camp, and that person is not revealing much. "Nothing to report" doesn't contradict anything we've heard.
 

Lord Zlatan

Full Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2016
Messages
712
Location
Ireland
AFP and Reuters are comparable in terms of credibility and track record. Both globally recognized agencies (along with AP). AFP are apparently publishing something different from the earlier Reuters piece.
not really that different. Until negotiations are complete and exclusivity is granted, there is nothing new
 

LARulz

Full Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
18,248
AFP and Reuters are comparable in terms of credibility and track record. Both globally recognized agencies (along with AP). AFP are apparently publishing something different from the earlier Reuters piece.
Yep, now it's interesting. If it's Reuters vs Times then it's Reuters every day. Reuters vs AFP then it's two heavyweights
 

JuriM

New Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
2,266
Location
Estonia
The negotiations are confidential, taking place under a non-disclosure agreement. Who exactly are the likes of Keegan and Jacobs supposed to be getting info from within the negotiation room?
You don't have to get that info from someone in the room - security/hotel staff etc. People see who meet and how long these meetings take etc.
 

Utd heap

Models for Coin.
Joined
Aug 15, 2006
Messages
21,701
Attacking anyone having a different opinion is naive and stupid in the extreme. Let the process take its route. The fans can then decide from whatever different perspective or ethical standpoint they will carry on their support or otherwise.
The fact fans have to 'choose' if we are prepared to support the owners of the club is a shambles in the first place. It shouldn't be like this.
 

Rightnr

Wants players fined for winning away.
Joined
Jan 25, 2015
Messages
14,764
I trust Reuters but both what they say and what the AP say can be true if the Glazers are basically engaged in a parallel sale process, save for the final decision, as has been previously reported.

Qatar can be negotiating exclusivity and Ineos could be at the same stage or similar and this would mean nothing has theoretically changed.

My biggest issue at the moment is the fact this may be holding up transfers of really great long-term targets and this gives another excuse to the incompetents at the club who don't really need any more 'help' to fail.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,815
Location
Hollywood CA
its all the wording though. The Reuters report said they are discussing exclusivity not that its done, you can discuss it with "nothing new"
Discussing exclusivity is however a different thing than awaiting clarity which is what AFP published.

"A source close to Sheikh Jassim Bin Hamad Al Thani said Thursday that the Qatari bidders were still awaiting clarity from Manchester United after a report suggested they could be offered exclusivity in the battle to buy the club".
 

Phil

Full Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2003
Messages
11,424
Amusing seeing Times sports writers rubbishing Reuters on an acquisition story, sure Matts
 

Nonameisknown

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 5, 2022
Messages
133
Supports
United
Seperate the reporting from the evidence people. Look at who has taken some very clear obvious actions. The company registration, Rio's video, Glazers asking for an SJ bid increase and more if you'll just look. Evidence! Evidence!! Evidence!!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.