LilyWhiteSpur
New Member
Define evil though?Some people are just evil
Define evil though?Some people are just evil
i don’t agree with capital punishment by the way.Besides the fact that I don't agree with the state killing people, one of my major issues with it is always that there is a person who has to do the killing. It's not the faceless state. There's a person who has to do the hanging or electrocution or administer the injection. So in effect the state is turning people into a multiple murderers in order to administer justice which has to be traumatising. That's just not something I can agree with.
Besides the fact that I don't agree with the state killing people, one of my major issues with it is always that there is a person who has to do the killing. It's not the faceless state. There's a person who has to do the hanging or electrocution or administer the injection. So in effect the state is turning people into a multiple murderers in order to administer justice which has to be traumatising. That's just not something I can agree with.
Maybe, but the option of execution is protected by law on one country and not in the otherTrue, but bear in mind, if you had a referendum on bringing back the death penalty in the UK, I fairly sure the majority would be in favor
OK - a death penalty is never going to be 100% a deterrent anywhere but I would imagine in places like Singapore a lot of people would think twice about importing drugs there because of it
We are going a little off topicHow is this still in the football forum?
Oh I didn't get the impression you did.i don’t agree with capital punishment by the way.
But if it put 10% off a crime would it be a positive thing?Nah, the poverty and desperation in our world means the risk is worth taking for some. Once the reward is enough.
Well it is does have the sanction of murder in the title so only a littleWe are going a little off topic
Not for me.But if it put 10% off a crime would it be a positive thing?
That could easily be reversed, you can bet your boots that if a politician thought it would win them enough votes they'd do it in a heartbeatMaybe, but the option of execution is protected by law on one country and not in the other
Oh I didn't get the impression you did.
[/QUOTE
Probably right, in the grand scheme of things. But there need to be more support for prisons, no point locking people up with no chance of turning it around.Not for me.
The state in my opinion, if it exists, must set standards.
And also 1 dead innocent far outweighs any possible deterrent.
The latter is basically why the UK abolished it, too many wrong executionsNot for me.
The state in my opinion, if it exists, must set standards. It can't be outside its own laws.
And also 1 dead innocent far outweighs any possible deterrent.
There is a Russian anarchist called Alexander Berkman who wrote about the legitimacy of assassinations that would serve a greater good. He himself tried it, and failed spectacularly, and went to prison. He wrote an amazing book called the Prison Memoirs of an Anarchist which starts off as a philosophical discussion about murder and ends up as an amazing analysis of incarceration. Highly recommend.
https://www.dublincity.ie/library/blog/john-lonergan-transcriptBut in 1996/97... six little pockets in Dublin supply 75% of all Dublin born prisoners. I’ll just repeat that for you because people won’t often believe it. 75% of people came from six separate little areas, tiny little areas by the way not huge big areas, tiny little areas within six separate postal districts, 75% of all people in Mountjoy in 1996 came from those addresses
Yep, really interesting stuff. Especially as a native of one of those areas. If not one, it'd be close.I'll give that a look. It's sounds right up my street. We were given a tour of Mountjoy years ago (my friend was doing a photography exhibition on Mountjoy and got us in). This was back when you could get in. John Lonergan was in charge then. It was really interesting and we saw the Playboy of the Western World put on the prisoners but listening to Lonergan talk about the prison system was very interesting. One thing he pointed out which I heard him speak about in an interview later was why the majority of the prison population was from a few small area so of Dublin.
https://www.dublincity.ie/library/blog/john-lonergan-transcript
I wonder if the same would be true of a lot of cities in the UK, I suspect it might be similar, but before anyway says anything I have no actual idea or evidenceYep, really interesting stuff. Especially as a native of one of those areas.
It is the same globally I'd say.I wonder if the same would be true of a lot of cities in the UK, I suspect it might be similar, but before anyway says anything I have no actual idea or evidence
Apology acceptedSo it was my fault your were forced to bang your Qatar drum.
I can only apologise for making you lool like a crass shill in a thread about 7 deaths.
Now to find all the other culprits.
I wouldn't disagree, would be curious to see if there's any evidence of it, when I lived in Rochdale many moons ago I'm pretty sure 90% of the towns crooks lived on the same housing estate I did - and no .... I'm one of the 10%It is the same globally I'd say.
Another is that it's cheaper than putting people in prison for life - and again that's not true either, at least for the US.It's one of the most prevalent but incorrect arguments for it.
Another is that it's cheaper than putting people in prison for life - and again that's not true either, at least for the US.
It's a little off-topic though, don't you think? We've swerved a little away from Saudi Arabia executing people for what shouldn't be an offense at all, how them owning Newcastle should make supporting that club difficult, and how United fans might face similar issues in the future if the Qatari bid wins.
[/QUOTE in the US?
Not arguing but is that actually true?
To be honest, murderers are the first ones who decide that someone shouldn't be alive ( for whatever reason), so they murder that person.I just read the link you posted and that's what it said?
I'd have issues with anyone deciding who deserves to be alive to be honest.
He's an interesting guy. I've seen a bunch of interviews with him over the yearsI'll give that a look. It's sounds right up my street. We were given a tour of Mountjoy years ago (my friend was doing a photography exhibition on Mountjoy and got us in). This was back when you could get in. John Lonergan was in charge then. It was really interesting and we saw the Playboy of the Western World put on the prisoners but listening to Lonergan talk about the prison system was very interesting. One thing he pointed out which I heard him speak about in an interview later was why the majority of the prison population was from a few small area so of Dublin.
https://www.dublincity.ie/library/blog/john-lonergan-transcript
I can't remember where I read about it previously, but if I look it up now, it still seems correct. See for example:Not arguing but is that actually true?
Interesting, seems it's generally more costly because of legal fees for the multiple appeals rather than the actual cost of incarcerating them, give that it usually takes 20 years or more to actually carry out the sentence that's not surprising I guessI can't remember where I read about it previously, but if I look it up now, it still seems correct. See for example:
https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/which-is-cheaper-execution-or-life-in-prison-without-parole-31614
https://ballotpedia.org/Fact_check/Is_the_death_penalty_more_expensive_than_life_in_prison
This is for the US only. There is some variation, but in most states, the death penalty is considerably more expensive because of the special treatment and process costs.
It's not necessarily where I would to go, cause it's first and foremost a moral and legal question; but it's always interesting how even economic arguments often don't hold up when it comes to harsh policy (similar with minimum wage and welfare - since we're off-topic anyway).
Yeah, it's everything around it, and the special status death row prisoners have. If all that were taken away and the execution took.place much sooner, the additional cost would disappear. But obviously, the death penalty needs all that extra scrutiny (and even then it's wrong far too often given the nature of the penalty), and so it's kinda unavoidable if done properly. (Insofar as a word like 'properly' is applicable to the death penalty...)Interesting, seems it's generally more costly because of legal fees for the multiple appeals rather than the actual cost of incarcerating them, give that it usually takes 20 years or more to actually carry out the sentence that's not surprising I guess
And these people are criminals, so the state should be better than that.To be honest, murderers are the first ones who decide that someone shouldn't be alive ( for whatever reason), so they murder that person.
Apology accepted
And I even tried to bring the discussion back on topic but no joy !
So you think the majority of people want it, and the politicians, but have you answered the question as to whether you support the death penalty, reading between the lines, you do?That could easily be reversed, you can bet your boots that if a politician thought it would win them enough votes they'd do it in a heartbeat
Obviously I know thatI wasnt really apologising Rood, I was really asking you to take responsibility for banging your drum inappropriately, especially after you initially only entered the thread to admonish inappropriate posts.
Deaf ears at this point.
There are some significant differences between LGBT rights in Qatar and Saudi Arabia.You’re gay…you wouldn’t be a part of nearly everyone.
Like at least I like both, you’d be fecked (except not literally).
And before someone jumps in about the footballers on the pitch and how it only matters how they’ll affect Manchester and the gays at old Trafford wind your neck in I don’t care about that. I just want to genuinely know what drives someone to post that sentence when they themselves are gay or queer.
Same.Really disappointed that this thread has been moved from the football forum.
Really?And let's not ignore the fact that half the population in Saudi Arabia (which would include me) is forced to wear a garbage bag with 2 holes in it all the time.
I understand why, you seem to think football is the center of this story. And it really isn't.Really disappointed that this thread has been moved from the football forum.
Really disappointed that this thread has been moved from the football forum.
No disrespect to women who choose to wear traditional garb in free countries, but if women are being forced to wear it, I'm not going to give it any sort of respect.Really?
No disrespect. Proceeds to call religious item a garbage bag.No disrespect to women who choose to wear traditional garb in free countries, but if women are being forced to wear it, I'm not going to give it any sort of respect.
Literally sounds like a nightmare to never be able to feel the sun on your skin.
My point is, if people consider the reality of living in either country for the minorities and women being discussed, Qatar is a lot closer to the West than Saudi Arabia. And that's not a defense of the Qatari regime, it's just an awareness of how scummy the Saudi regime is.