It's sad that the discourse around this has basically turned United fans against each other. Folks on both sides of the fence have taken to devaluing the good that either party taking over from the Glazers could do for us. Even now there are plenty of posters more interested in gloating about the Qatari withdrawal than asking what this offer actually means for United going forward.
Let's be fairly clear about this, either of the parties succeeding in a full takeover of United would have put the club in a much better situation; Jassim taking over would have left us debt free to spend our own money, as well as with a large immediate investment in the club's infrastructure, and INEOS while not having the same cash on hand to invest would at minimum have allowed us to take the Glazer dividend money and use it to pay off the debt (and likely would have invested a decent chunk of cash too). They also hopefully have gotten through a lot of the trial and error in running a football club with Nice.
United doesn't need a bottomless pit of cash - I'd be quite happy with anyone at the helm interested in securing the long term success of the club rather than treating it as a cash cow to milk dry. We make more than enough of our own money, except when that's drained by leech owners and meaningless debt.
The problem with the current offer is that it's not a takeover, and without it involving a guaranteed path to a takeover, it's hard to envisage how one could come to be without things going so badly wrong for United that the Glazers are forced to bail out. Pretty much any positive path forward for the club requires some sort of guaranteed buyout price for INEOS in the near(ish) future or something along those lines, otherwise it would be against their interests to invest money in improving the club's situation, and would seemingly just be another head at the Glazer table.