Eddy_JukeZ
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2012
- Messages
- 17,198
I didn't assume that. I never once said he wanted full control. Credible reports stated he wanted a say in transfers. Do you dispute that?Theres a ton that neither you nor I know.
For example you are assuming he wanted full control because of his own ego, and not because he didnt trust a club that sacks their global head scouts. You are assuming the medical staff operate well, and that the politics among players is manageable for the coach. You're assuming the way our transfer targets were set in the summer is consistent with Ten Hag's methods and preferences.
We actually dont know anything - we watch games and hope journalists punt on the right stuff. The people who will know are the guys making an audit and deep diving into the situation. I trust their judgement more than any other.
2nd bold: There's been reports of players picking up injuries through the intense training sessions ETH has put them through. But either way, there's been no real report of gross negligence by the medical staff. And there's been no real report of dressing room unrest or player politics getting in the way of his coaching.
3rd bolded: There's been no report ever of a player being signed without ETH's approval. He has a reported veto. His 1st preferential signing(or 2nd if you want to argue Kane) by all reports was Mount and he was signed early on.
You genuinely listed a ton of excuses for him. You argue that we don't know anything besides watching the games, but then listed a few assumptions without any credible information backing those assumptions.