Westminster Politics

africanspur

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
9,154
Supports
Tottenham Hotspur
This bit. Given enough runway, He’ll create a culture war in that space that actually divides people. He’s a cnut. But he’s a fairly effective one in the right (wrong) weather.
Ah right, as opposed to the culture wars, faltering services, economic mismanagement and poverty we've had in the past decade, which are uniting people and haven't already had an awful and dangerous impact on so many peoples lives.

Nope, what's actually most dangerous are this primed for civil war religious minority and the cat mimicking buffoon at their head.
 

The Corinthian

I will not take Mad Winger's name in vain
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
11,884
Supports
A Free Palestine
He’ll have more of a sway over a large swathe of the electorate than any Tory in the next election. He’s actually good at working the culture war to his own benefit. The entire Tory party is just loud.

Irrelevant when outside the tent pissing in. But the feral little fecker is in the building now. He’ll find a little cohort of cnuts and poison the well in a meaningful manner. He’ll be toxic and loud. The Tories are traders in homeopathy by comparison.

Yeah there’s a layer of hyperbole there, it’s punched up. But I truly believe he can do more damage at election time than any of the Tories. They’re all dead. Toast.
This is beyond hyperbole. I find posts like this so bizarre. We’ve had Tories run this country into the ground - it’s as worse as it’s ever been but we’re all meant to be afraid of GG and what he stands for? Come off it.
 

TwoSheds

More sheds (and tiles) than you, probably
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
12,997
I'm not in Team Corbyn by any means but this conservative donor race row thing has me thinking how much he would have eviscerated the Tories over it. Starmer has no moral authority really because let's face it he'd take the cnut's money if he could, whereas Corbyn would be able to call the Tories out as the poodles that they are. It's a shame the Labour party in general is so cretinous on both its left and right wings.
 

Kaos

Full Member
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
31,819
Location
Ginseng Strip
I'm not in Team Corbyn by any means but this conservative donor race row thing has me thinking how much he would have eviscerated the Tories over it. Starmer has no moral authority really because let's face it he'd take the cnut's money if he could, whereas Corbyn would be able to call the Tories out as the poodles that they are. It's a shame the Labour party in general is so cretinous on both its left and right wings.
The best thing that can happen to democracy is to deprive it of big money, especially here in the UK, and more so in the US. Its hard to say how successful Corbyn would have been in attempting to weed out that rot, but I have no faith that Starmer would be able to curtail it. He's probably seen as malleable enough to be the recipient of these mega donors, who will just as quickly abandon him if/when the Tories restore a semblance of popularity again. Basically, we're stuck with being at the mercy of them until we have a complete rehaul of the system.
 

Jericholyte2

Full Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
3,583
Bloke is threatening his own MPs with an election.
It's the only bit of 'power' he has left!

"You're only in a job because I haven't called a GE yet. Sure, I'll lose my job as PM once we have the catastrophic defeat, but I'm more likely to keep my MP job than you are!"
 

Don't Kill Bill

Full Member
Joined
May 14, 2006
Messages
5,674
I'm not in Team Corbyn by any means but this conservative donor race row thing has me thinking how much he would have eviscerated the Tories over it. Starmer has no moral authority really because let's face it he'd take the cnut's money if he could, whereas Corbyn would be able to call the Tories out as the poodles that they are. It's a shame the Labour party in general is so cretinous on both its left and right wings.
His problem would have been the Union money and him being seen as their puppet. The donor scandal is really about influence buying and Corbyn's lack of distance from leading union figures would have hamstrung him. In all his time as leader I thought he was pretty ineffective in the media game.
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,741
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
This could be the end of the party. Not because of Rishi being any good, but I genuinely think if they change again and go straight to an election, the electorate will crush them into the dirt.
End of the party? Give over. It’s part of the fabric of this cursed country. An “institution” is an understatement.
 

WPMUFC

Full Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2013
Messages
9,659
Location
Australia
End of the party? Give over. It’s part of the fabric of this cursed country. An “institution” is an understatement.
I don't mean the party literally doesn't exist. But I think if they do this again, you could see an election result where they get 50,60,70 seats. Maybe worse. If that was to happen their role in government has ended for the foreseeable future.
 

Fergies Gum

Full Member
Joined
May 23, 2011
Messages
13,581
I can actually see Sunak quitting rather than facing a humiliating loss. The guy will take the cowards way out, resign as an MP and move to the US.
 

Bert_

Full Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2022
Messages
1,550
Location
Manchester
Wonder if we'll see some Tory defections to Labour from Cameronite MPs no one as ever heard of in the run up to the election, in a desperate attempt for them to keep their seats. Labour will probably go for it if they think it will force a GE. Plus their ideology isn't going go be an issue.

We'll probably see a few of the knuckle draggers defect to reform in order to boost their new careers as a right-wing shills once they lose their seats.
 

711

Verified Bird Expert
Scout
Joined
Dec 10, 2007
Messages
24,275
Location
Don't sign old players and cast offs
End of the party? Give over. It’s part of the fabric of this cursed country. An “institution” is an understatement.
It does seem unthinkable. On the other hand a party needs members to keep joining, and the average age of the Tory membership is 72, so they haven't been getting them recently. Financially they rely on big donors, but many of those are really seeking influence, and if there's no prospect of the Tories governing they might look elsewhere. And the same goes for those joining with dreams of being an MP and the gravy train, a lot aren't hugely ideological, they want the power, and without that will they bother?

There would still be some sort of right wing party though, so how much difference it would make I don't know, a rose by any other name and that, but it would be nice to have a good few years without them at least.
 

Don't Kill Bill

Full Member
Joined
May 14, 2006
Messages
5,674
More dangerous than Suella Braverman?

More dangerous than the party that illegally prorogued parliament?

Maybe, take a break and think about what you are agreeing with.
All I would say is that if Galloway represents the first religious party with any real sway or impact then it might be true.

I might be mistaken but I don't see how religion based parties and politics is ever a good thing or advances a country at all.

Its one of the current dichotomies in politics because it used to be the left was about secularism and now because of the Corbyn disaster you hear them cheering Galloway on as an FU to Starmer.
 

The Corinthian

I will not take Mad Winger's name in vain
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
11,884
Supports
A Free Palestine
All I would say is that if Galloway represents the first religious party with any real sway or impact then it might be true.

I might be mistaken but I don't see how religion based parties and politics is ever a good thing or advances a country at all.

Its one of the current dichotomies in politics because it used to be the left was about secularism and now because of the Corbyn disaster you hear them cheering Galloway on as an FU to Starmer.
The Workers Party of Britain isn't a religious party.
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,741
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
It does seem unthinkable. On the other hand a party needs members to keep joining, and the average age of the Tory membership is 72, so they haven't been getting them recently. Financially they rely on big donors, but many of those are really seeking influence, and if there's no prospect of the Tories governing they might look elsewhere. And the same goes for those joining with dreams of being an MP and the gravy train, a lot aren't hugely ideological, they want the power, and without that will they bother?

There would still be some sort of right wing party though, so how much difference it would make I don't know, a rose by any other name and that, but it would be nice to have a good few years without them at least.
The point is that ultimately the Tory party isn’t a fixed ideology, it’s a racket. There’s no way the party doesn’t pull itself together and gets its house in order ready for the following election. Everyone thought Labour were dead in 2019 and look at the polls now. They don’t believe in anything other than looking after their own interests and it’s harder to do that out of power so they will be pragmatic and work alongside the right wing press to position themselves for Starmer’s mistakes.

The sad fact is that ultimately this is a right wing country and the Tory party is home for just enough people to win FPTP elections more often than not. Starmer isn’t going to do anything that will convince a population with short memories that Labour are the long option. A rebranded Tory party promising tax cuts and prosperity will absolutely walk it in 28/29.
 

Don't Kill Bill

Full Member
Joined
May 14, 2006
Messages
5,674
The Workers Party of Britain isn't a religious party.
That is arguably about support rather than intention. I highlighted the word IF as its not a known fact but one hypothesis of what it morphs into.

What is it they said about the BREXIT party and racists.

You don't have to be a Muslim to vote WPB but...

The worry would be that its a first step towards it and so that would make Galloway dangerous wouldn't it?
 

The Corinthian

I will not take Mad Winger's name in vain
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
11,884
Supports
A Free Palestine
That is arguably about support rather than intention. I highlighted the word IF as its not a known fact but one hypothesis of what it morphs into.

What is it they said about the BREXIT party and racists.

You don't have to be a Muslim to vote WPB but...

The worry would be that its a first step towards it and so that would make Galloway dangerous wouldn't it?
No. The fear mongering about GG, a single MP in this thread is really weird.

We've had the Tories run this country into the ground - it's been as bas as it's ever been. The Tory cosplayers have U-turned on pretty much every policy under Keir, so even if they were around, it wouldn't be much better.

This is the exact same rhetoric people, Daily Mail etc come out with when they talk about Corbyn. 'Yes it's shit but can you imagine how shitter it would have been under Corbyn??'. It's a totally nonsensical way to evaluate things. You deal with the reality you have, not the hypothetical one. And in the reality we have, the Tories have ruined pretty much every single public institution going.

Secondly, if Muslims were to vote tactically, this is dangerous because of what exactly?
 

jojojo

JoJoJoJoJoJoJo
Staff
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
38,332
Location
Welcome to Manchester reception committee
It was more like a decade of asset stripping.
Yep. Sold most of the country's assets to raise funds. Blew the cash on tax cuts and shortterm feel good gains all the while transferring public wealth into private hands. Skipped the opportunity from North sea gas to build infrastructure and plan for the future.

We're living in the era when Thatcher's plans have found their logical conclusion - an infrastructure disaster, stifling those old "one nation" things about education and social mobility. Instead we've got massive housing misery, sewage in the rivers and declining living standards for anybody actually relying on working for a living.

I think Labour are a bit late to the Thatcher party - even if it's supposed to appeal to OAP Brexit voters. I guess this is the current version of appealing to the Dunkirk spirit, but does it actually resonate with anyone they're trying to win over? Unless it's some Tory MPs looking for a new home of course who want a slogan to use in their defection speech.