clarkydaz
Full Member
always liked Kun, top man
Not anymore, appeals are dealt with very quick these days.Can he appeal so he is available for the Derby?
It's a Kunspiracy!
I hope they appeal,it'll be considered frivolous and the ban will be extended.Will he miss the United game or will City appeal?
It says he has until Wednesday 31st, 6 pm to appeal.Can he appeal so he is available for the Derby?
His value will be going down over the next few games as people drop him, those with him now could probably make a profit on him to be honest if they act fast.Let's see them FF players pick up points now! All their Aguero basket eggs have been smashed and you know they can't sell him because he'll be too expensive to buy back in.
I'm expecting some clear distance in the leagues I'm in now.
I dropped him like a bad habit! The moment the media picked up on this I let him go, no way he wasn't getting charged.His value will be going down over the next few games as people drop him, those with him now could probably make a profit on him to be honest if they act fast.
The fun has begunGood news, can't wait to read all the blue moon meltdown incoming.
Very goodIt's a Kunspiracy!
Do moral victories gain 3 points?I hope he's banned and we smash them
Screw caring about a "moral victory" Most City fans will find a reason to complain no matter what
I'd rather they felt hard done by the ban and loss - Salt in the wound
Arsenal have a firm hold on that league by not buying success.Do moral victories gain 3 points?
They can feck off and play in an Ethical Premier League
Letters are being sent alreadySent my bit off to FA. Not so much about whether serg should be banned or not. More about the blind lying official. Also mentioned how big brush and there England Capt got away with last incidents and the trial by media. I know it ain't going to get any where but it made me feel better.
Don't get this. It was accidental in my book.
Yellow card at most.
Retrospective yellow Couldn't make this shite up if I wanted to!Can he just get a retrospective yellow, or is it a straight red?
Admit it: you've been praying for the ban just so you could use this.It's a Kunspiracy!
Fixed it for you. Its a pleasure, don't mention it.I'm going to revisit this thread inpeace if we lose without Sergio.
InNot anymore, appeals are dealt with very quick these days.
Aye, we should beware of that.I'm going to revisit this thread if we beat you without Sergio.
Kuyt hat-trick?Aye, we should beware of that.
If I'm not mistaken, Liverpool famously benched Gerrard and Torres against us once and won.
Oh, look, it is back.I'm going to revisit this thread if we beat you without Sergio.
Why?I'm going to revisit this thread if we beat you without Sergio.
Don't think so. Kuyt's goals were heavily assisted by Suarez on that day, who was bought in to replace Torres pretty much.Kuyt hat-trick?
You'll find the difference is that we don't protect and defend Fellaini.
Do you see anyone in here excusing Fellaini?
Slightly off topic, but do you reckon we would have reacted with the same righteousness, if instead of Fellaini it had been let's say Ibra or Mata? I am not saying we wouldn't have, just want to know what you guys think. While it goes without saying that Bluemoon is a basketcase, IMO we too would have tried to find some justification if it had been someone other than Fellaini.Difference is, comments on our thread aren't justifying it whereas on Bluemoon there were comments trying to justify Aguero's saying his "couldn't have been intentional as it was a 'get off me' type of swing"
I think their owners may struggle to qualifyDo moral victories gain 3 points?
They can feck off and play in an Ethical Premier League
Mata, pigs will fly before he elbows someoneSlightly off topic, but do you reckon we would have reacted with the same righteousness, if instead of Fellaini it had been let's say Ibra or Mata? I am not saying we wouldn't have, just want to know what you guys think. While it goes without saying that Bluemoon is a basketcase, IMO we too would have tried to find some justification if it had been someone other than Fellaini.
I think we would have excused it to the point of "out of character", but still we wouldn't have denied the clearly obvious intent and ban. It is the rules after all, and they are the same for everyone.Slightly off topic, but do you reckon we would have reacted with the same righteousness, if instead of Fellaini it had been let's say Ibra or Mata? I am not saying we wouldn't have, just want to know what you guys think. While it goes without saying that Bluemoon is a basketcase, IMO we too would have tried to find some justification if it had been someone other than Fellaini.