BluesJr
Owns the moral low ground
- Joined
- May 15, 2013
- Messages
- 9,052
Why do people insist on panicking when right now there is no evidence to do so? React to news as it happens, that’s the only way to deal with these situations.
City are also looking to grow their squad being miles ahead in the league. Yes, we are second, but looking at the chasing pack, we are three unlucky/bad results from being in a dogfight.it is not like we are 5th in the Standings. We are continuing to grow as Lingard, Martial and Rashford are getting better (while being 2nd)..plus Paul missed so many games, difficult to stay in rhythm..
The signing would be a mistake.
No you're the only one making it political. What you raised is an entirely different debate altogether.sosolid4u.........what is your moniker all about?
When football clubs are owned by states using them for political gain, it isn't me making it political, it becomes inherently political.
The Redcafe twitter account said it was routine maintenance, but I'm wondering did we crash a server with all the f5-ing.Stop crashing the forums you cnuts
They do that a lot better with the site up.Forum admins trolling us.
I think it's a case of mentally preparing for the worst, if they pretend to themselves its not going to happen, it somehow makes it easier if it ends up going pear shaped, when we all know if City end up getting him, those same people will be going bloody mental on here.Why do people insist on panicking when right now there is no evidence to do so? React to news as it happens, that’s the only way to deal with these situations.
The usual cycle of muppetry suggests that no new news = it's off, even though arguably the most reliable journalist in the world said he's pretty much ours less than 24 hours ago. Happens every time.Why do people insist on panicking when right now there is no evidence to do so? React to news as it happens, that’s the only way to deal with these situations.
Or the simpler answer is.... City don't want to pay the new fees for a player that will be free in months.If ever City wanted to make a point about being more attractive to players/richer than us, this would be the perfect time.
The player by all accounts wants City
City won't pay over a certain amount
Probably unexpectedly we then come in
City just wait for us to agree a fee and package
Come in late and match it/slightly better it
Sanchez to City, United look stupid, journos who already brown nose Pep to oblivion have a field day
Based on what? betting odds? Nervous nelly.City’s odds are still extremely low for a team who’ve supposedly walked away. This saga is far from over IMO.
Betting odds move on stupid people flushing money down the drain and bookies moving prices to entice stupid people to bet on transfers.City’s odds are still extremely low for a team who’ve supposedly walked away. This saga is far from over IMO.
@Macern was streaming againForum crashing twice, what's happening today ?
If anything this would have a good effect on our younger players. He would probably play on the right so this won't affect any of the young players game time, and having the presence of an experienced, proven forward like Alexis takes lots of pressure off of their shoulders.it is not like we are 5th in the Standings. We are continuing to grow as Lingard, Martial and Rashford are getting better (while being 2nd)..plus Paul missed so many games, difficult to stay in rhythm..
The signing would be a mistake.
What extent? IMO they can just chill out, keep tabs with the agent, then swoop in. I am working off the assumption that Sanchez prefers City - this was widely & consistently reported so am assuming trueOr the simpler answer is.... City don't want to pay the new fees for a player that will be free in months.
Why would Man City go to the extent that your claiming?
Do you know how MUFC became the frontrunner? The agent asked us and we said ok.
Also, the player wants to leave arsenal more than join City.
I'm on helicopter watchSo who's staking out Carrington then?
This is a total fallacy. Of course the odds are dictated by money placed but when a deal is essentially done they will be rapidly cut or closed. It’s their job to make money so they’re not going to let ITK people fleece them. To act like they have zero insight is laughable.Betting odds move on stupid people flushing money down the drain and bookies moving prices to entice stupid people to bet on transfers.
Transfer better has ZERO impact on a deal, and they have ZERO insight into what is happening.
Why do people insist on panicking when right now there is no evidence to do so? React to news as it happens, that’s the only way to deal with these situations.
Has anyone anywhere said that this is "off"? I haven't seen it. By all accounts we're very much in the mix.I think it's a case of mentally preparing for the worst, if they pretend to themselves its not going to happen, it somehow makes it easier if it ends up going pear shaped, when we all know if City end up getting him, those same people will be going bloody mental on here.