MichaelRed
Full Member
- Joined
- May 18, 2015
- Messages
- 1,649
The judge in the UK trial even cited that in his conclusion. Saying that he believed she was trustworthy & clearly wasn't using JD for money because donating all of the money to charity was not the actions of a gold-digger.The most telling thing about this whole farce is how she repeatedly tried to obfuscate between the words donate and pledge.
She had 13 months to donate the 7 million dollars to those two charities, repeatedly said that she'd donated the whole sum before this trial (both in public and in court), and continues to act as if she's actually "donated" what she promised.
One might argue that this has nothing to do with the allegations themselves, and I agree. However, I can't take her allegations seriously if she's just flat out lying about something as important as donating to charities.
Edit: Also we saw evidence today of a statement AH made when JD donated $100,000 on her behalf where they said "we're happy Johnny has a new-found novel interest in charity work that he'd never previously been interested in.". Yeah, the same Johnny Depp that has done countless amounts of charity work & made many visits to children's hospitals to spend time cheering up these poor children.