Fergie's gum
Full Member
Under 8% is considered having too little fat. I recall reading that Stallone had as low as a 3% body fat percentage when filming Rocky III (I believe) where he fainted repeatedly as a result. If Ronaldo has a 5% body fat percentage, he would probably struggle with the same and he would look far more ripped than he already does. I talked to someone who did fitness and he said he had a 7% body fat percentage at his best and blood veins on his stomach were clearly visible at that time. about 15% is quite normal for men, 5-10% is normal for male athletes - if Anderson has a 9,6% he is still within the normal. Thus for him to shred 4-5 pounds sounds reasonable, but would in no way make him go from overweight to normal - it would make him go from a normal athlete to a slightly above average for an athlete. Body fat is probably just about half the story anyhow.
So you're saying it's normal for athletes to be between 5-10%, but at the same time you say Ronaldo would struggle if he was 5%?
Based on the general consensus of 5-10% for athletes, 5% is the target, 10% is at the fat end for normal athletes.
If you talk to cross country skiers and runners, most of them argue that footballers aren't much athletes at all anyhow.
When one watches Anderson play football at one of the biggest clubs in the world, I can see how they can come to that conclusion.
I'm not knocking the guy, he seems a great character to have in the dressing room, but he has been promising to lose the weight for years. He just doesn't have the will power to fulfill his potential.