3KDré
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2015
- Messages
- 6,647
Excellent worker, it will be difficult to replace him.
g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
Yeh I would agree with this, best crosser in the team by far. Don't think we can get away with him at LB in the big games thoAlthough he's best LB overall, his defending is very poor at times, which is understandable considering he's a winger playing there. What he offers going forward makes up for his defending for me.
IIRC, Valencia was terrible defensively when LVG switched him permanently for the RB position, I pretty much hated him a lot after the 3-0 lose to Everton, but as games went on he learned how to position himself defensively better.Although he's best LB overall, his defending is very poor at times, which is understandable considering he's a winger playing there. What he offers going forward makes up for his defending for me.
Yeah overall I agree, but Valencia is a physical beast, his pace and power get him out trouble even when his positioning isn't right or his behind the play, Young doesn't have that and he's 32, turning 33 next season, so sadly for him he doesn't have time to nail that position down like Valencia did.IIRC, Valencia was terrible defensively when LVG switched him permanently for the RB position, I pretty much hated him a lot after the 3-0 lose to Everton, but as games went on he learned how to position himself defensively better.
Young is struggling from the thing, being switched from a winger with minimal defensive roles to a full back that needs to be very good defensively needs time. It's shame we took that long to switch him permanently as a full back though.
This, both players are good, but not the quality required if we want to get back to the top. Do a City and blow big bucks on two fullbacks, possibly a backup for Pogba, a replacement no. 10 and a right-sided attacker and we are all set.Solid option, but like Valencia he should be delegated a backup role next season.
Its not as easy as that. We wont spend 100 m on two full backs.This, both players are good, but not the quality required if we want to get back to the top. Do a City and blow big bucks on two fullbacks, possibly a backup for Pogba, a replacement no. 10 and a right-sided attacker and we are all set.
Just half our first team then. You don't want much.This, both players are good, but not the quality required if we want to get back to the top. Do a City and blow big bucks on two fullbacks, possibly a backup for Pogba, a replacement no. 10 and a right-sided attacker and we are all set.
You don't need to spend 100m on fullbacks. Good fullbacks will cost good money though, so if we aren't paying the price it'll cost, we will continue using makeshift players there.Its not as easy as that. We wont spend 100 m on two full backs.
I hope they will be at least as good, maybe better! I hope on the other side we can get a player who cross half as good as Young, that would be a dramatic improvement.I hope our next long term LB/LWB will be half as good at crossing as Ashley Young.
Nah, he's not one of them in fairness. If there's one thing you can't fault its his work ethic and determination.Time for new contract and Ashley Young becomes Philip lahm. Again.
Was tongue in cheek.Nah, he's not one of them in fairness. If there's one thing you can't fault its his work ethic and determination.
He gets more space at LB, and he is quite an intelligent player. Too bad that his speed, which used to be pretty good, seems to have more or less gone. He's still a good player to have, but he has always been just a good player to have.He's actually become a bit of a playmaker at LB. Not only is his crossing alright but he constantly pings balls down the flanks behind the oppos defence for our attackers to run onto.
Thought he was on 110kContract extended to 2019. 130k p/w the mind boggles
Semantics - that was the clause in the contract, a one-year extension.Contract extended to 2019. 130k p/w the mind boggles