Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Red in STL

Turnover not takeover
Joined
Dec 1, 2022
Messages
10,162
Location
In Bed
Supports
The only team that matters
But even Liverpool with arguably the best manager in the world currently are falling behind now and the owners simply don't have the money to reinforce given how little Klopp has spend these past windows and their squad is ever aging. At this point you either get some uber rich owner or you fall behind. That's what football has become.
FSG do have the money, they just choose not to spend it like water, (or oil) and when they spend big they spend big, last year they gave a baseball player a 6 year $140 million contract, they're offering something bigger for someone else this year
 

mav_9me

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
12,513
FSG do have the money, they just choose not to spend it like water, (or oil) and when they spend big they spend big, last year they gave a baseball player a 6 year $140 million contract, they're offering something bigger for someone else this year
That's not a lot in baseball though. In any case it's not money they are putting in. It's the club's money putting back into club no?
 

Red in STL

Turnover not takeover
Joined
Dec 1, 2022
Messages
10,162
Location
In Bed
Supports
The only team that matters
That's not a lot in baseball though. In any case it's not money they are putting in. It's the club's money putting back into club no?
It is when you've gotten a dozen guys on contracts like that, and the club doesn't really have that kind of money, they get their income from TV, and guess who owns the TV station, yep, FSG, and of course the rest comes from over-priced merchandise and extortionate priced drinks and food at the games -whilst it's not directly the same there's a lot of overlap
 

Messier1994

The Swedish Rumble
Joined
Oct 7, 2022
Messages
1,368
This club being owned by MBS and co would be a bitter pill to swallow.
Yeah, that is where I would draw the line for sure. There are skeletons and then there are skeletons.

Imagine if you are related to the journalist who MBS had murdered and chopped up in pieces, and then see how he (he is the Saudi state) gets to buy and own the biggest sports brand in the world. For me it’s a complete mystery that the Saudi’s could buy Newcastle. At the same time, it’s sanctimonious to some degrees since we all probably live in countries that also does business with the Saudi’s.

What would drawing a line mean for me? I certainly wouldn’t mind seeing protests. Seeing like the Must come out and say that they will try to stop it.
 

madzo2007

Full Member
Joined
May 2, 2007
Messages
2,202
Location
Belfast, Ireland
Gotta love the people who think a multi-billion pound take over of a football club or any business could be done in a couple of weeks, just because rumours have gone quiet or we don't hear much. Can't compare it to Chelsea as Roman was under severe pressure to get a quick sale as the club could have went under because of his sanctions.

The Glazer's aren't in any mad rush and these things generally take months to sort out.
 

the_cliff

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
5,684
Yeah, that fan made himself look silly, he may just be a redcafe poster. As I've mentioned regularly in this thread leveraged buyouts are still allowed in football. Not sure where all this none sense that rules have changed has come from.
 

Plant0x84

Shame we’re aren’t more like Brighton
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
13,554
Location
Carpark and snack area adjacent to the abyss
Yeah, that fan made himself look silly, he may just be a redcafe poster. As I've mentioned regularly in this thread leveraged buyouts are still allowed in football. Not sure where all this none sense that rules have changed has come from.
Sadly, I’d agree with you. His argument wasn’t well thought through at all.
 

Boondog

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2022
Messages
699
I hate when I agree with Simon. But he's right. Fans are fans, we love the game and we pony up the bucks and sit in the seats and the ones who forget that and think they are special get replaced by the next fan who will gladly replace them.

Nothing wrong with fans organizing what they want for the betterment of the club, but acting like they're some sort of union is a joke. Get over yourselves.

Re: the new owners I'm going to be pissed beyond belief if EtH is replaced because I think this guy is going to be elite with some real financial backing. Read somewhere that the middle-east ownership groups favor big name managers. But if they replace him I'll piss and moan about it then root my ass off the first game under the new manager.
 

Rightnr

Wants players fined for winning away.
Joined
Jan 25, 2015
Messages
14,678
Ah, that rare moment when Simon Jordan is right about something or rather he gives the opinion the caftards like.

The moment they don't though, he'll be a clown again. Epic hypocrisy yet again.
 

Rozay

Master of Hindsight
Joined
Oct 22, 2012
Messages
27,305
Location
...
I hate when I agree with Simon. But he's right. Fans are fans, we love the game and we pony up the bucks and sit in the seats and the ones who forget that and think they are special get replaced by the next fan who will gladly replace them.

Nothing wrong with fans organizing what they want for the betterment of the club, but acting like they're some sort of union is a joke. Get over yourselves.

Re: the new owners I'm going to be pissed beyond belief if EtH is replaced because I think this guy is going to be elite with some real financial backing. Read somewhere that the middle-east ownership groups favor big name managers. But if they replace him I'll piss and moan about it then root my ass off the first game under the new manager.
There’s no need to read anything surely? A simple look at the clubs they own will show one has Eddie Howe in charge and another Cristophe Galtier.
 

Boondog

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2022
Messages
699
There’s no need to read anything surely? A simple look at the clubs they own will show one has Eddie Howe in charge and another Cristophe Galtier.
Not sweating it just yet since it's so early in the process. But you sure did a fine job looking that up. Providing a great service there keep it up.
 

sglowrider

Thinks the caf is 'wokeish'.
Joined
Dec 27, 2009
Messages
25,242
Location
Hell on Earth
Its the respective right brain v left brain clashing. On the emotional side ie the fans have elevated themselves to a level where they think they are entitled to the running of the club. At £6billion? It's all pure numbers.
In fact, it's been skewing that way since the PL was formed some 30+ years ago. It was a commercial venture ever since and yet recent fans seem to think emotionally about club ownership.

They need to get real and just either accept that it's pure commercialised entertainment or find £6billion of spare change and make it into some philanthropic venture.

Otherwise, get off that entitled soapbox and wake up to the real world.
 

red thru&thru

Full Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
7,657
Owners should engage with their fans, yes. But for them to think that they should have a say in how it should be run or be sitting on the board is ridiculous.

If the supporters group want a genuine say on how the club should be run, then they need to have a whip round together, and purchase the club.
 

Vapor trail

Full Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2022
Messages
1,280
Its the respective right brain v left brain clashing. On the emotional side ie the fans have elevated themselves to a level where they think they are entitled to the running of the club. At £6billion? It's all pure numbers.
In fact, it's been skewing that way since the PL was formed some 30+ years ago. It was a commercial venture ever since and yet recent fans seem to think emotionally about club ownership.

They need to get real and just either accept that it's pure commercialised entertainment or find £6billion of spare change and make it into some philanthropic venture.

Otherwise, get off that entitled soapbox and wake up to the real world.
Even more so if the lack of capability for the club to compete. All the best young players in the upcoming window Mbappe, Bellingham and perhaps Gvardiol and United are not in the mix for one of them. It's not about the money spent but also how the Glazers have shaped the hierarchy throughout the years. Woodward to Murtough (jury still out), lack of investment in the infrastructure, terrible management decisions like keeping Solskjaer beyond the Europa League final. Another 10 years of Glazer economics and the club will 100% turn into a top 10 team.

I understand the skeptical elements about a middle eastern owner but it's at a point where you have to wonder if any consortium / private investment firm are even capable of doing anything worse than the Glazers. Hopefully this is the absolute last we see of them with some significant developments to follow on the next few months.
 

Cloud7

Full Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
12,905
The Athletics latest article toys with the idea that the Saudi's could ditch Newcastle (who, they say, they didn't really want) and buy Manchester United (who, they say, were the club they actually wanted to buy all along)

Imagine.
I don't think they ever did want Newcastle. The stories were always that the Saudis wanted United. The Newcastle purchase always seemed to just be because they couldn't find another club to buy. I would not be surprised if this ends up happening somehow
 

MDFC Manager

Full Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
24,488
The Athletics latest article toys with the idea that the Saudi's could ditch Newcastle (who, they say, they didn't really want) and buy Manchester United (who, they say, were the club they actually wanted to buy all along)

Imagine.
Well, athletic read the caf and probably stole my speculation :mad:
Wouldn't surprise me if they (PIF) palm off Newcastle to one of the Saudi 'private' companies and bid for United as the flagship.
 

sglowrider

Thinks the caf is 'wokeish'.
Joined
Dec 27, 2009
Messages
25,242
Location
Hell on Earth
I don't think they ever did want Newcastle. The stories were always that the Saudis wanted United. The Newcastle purchase always seemed to just be because they couldn't find another club to buy. I would not be surprised if this ends up happening somehow
Of course, they never wanted the Bar Codes. Most Saudis have never wondered beyond Central London, never mind beyond the M25. Why would they?
I bet 99% of them couldn't find Newcastle even if you put a gun bone saw to their heads.
 

Wednesday at Stoke

Full Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Messages
21,758
Location
Copenhagen
Supports
Time Travel
I don't think they ever did want Newcastle. The stories were always that the Saudis wanted United. The Newcastle purchase always seemed to just be because they couldn't find another club to buy. I would not be surprised if this ends up happening somehow
I’m pretty sure I remember reading reports that they wanted a club that would be cheaper, so they could sink a lot more money into developing it rather than the initial purchase price. With that in mind, Newcastle was the perfect club for them. It was cheap yet extremely big and well supported and thirsty for some competent ownership and management after years of Mike Ashley, Steve Bruce and Joe Kinnear.
 

Plant0x84

Shame we’re aren’t more like Brighton
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
13,554
Location
Carpark and snack area adjacent to the abyss
Owners should engage with their fans, yes. But for them to think that they should have a say in how it should be run or be sitting on the board is ridiculous.

If the supporters group want a genuine say on how the club should be run, then they need to have a whip round together, and purchase the club.
Any form of fan ownership, especially at United would be a bigger shitshow than the Glazers. Absolute disaster waiting to happen.
 

UnitedSofa

You'll Never Walk Away
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Messages
6,815
okay but what sane business person would agree to that?
A smart one.

Get them in to keep the fans on side & then take on their views and dismiss their views

All good thinking you’re “on the board” when in reality, you might as well be pissing in the wind.

Being on the board is all well and good, it’s having an owner who will listen to you, thats the hardest and biggest hurdle
 

Tarrou

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
25,725
Location
Sydney
A smart one.

Get them in to keep the fans on side & then take on their views and dismiss their views

All good thinking you’re “on the board” when in reality, you might as well be pissing in the wind.

Being on the board is all well and good, it’s having an owner who will listen to you, thats the hardest and biggest hurdle
what? No, that isn’t how a BoD works

you’d be giving away power which could cost you a lot of money
 

redcucumber

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2022
Messages
3,271
Who needs fans on the board when you've got football luminaries like Edward Glazer, Kevin Glazer, Joel Glazer, Bryan Glazer, and Avram Glazer in the mix.
 

Messier1994

The Swedish Rumble
Joined
Oct 7, 2022
Messages
1,368
So Beckham is in Qatar.
https://www.gloucestershirelive.co....id-beckham-inspires-england-world-7898284.amp

I see two possible reason for this:
(a) He is there to negotiate with a consortium to buy United.
(b) He is the official Ambassador of the World Cup and it wouldn’t at all be strange if he was there in any event as a rich famous former player.

I also think that it is plausible that people from the Qatar Investment Fund is in Qatar. So he could be discussing with them, or someone else, or not at all.
 

Messier1994

The Swedish Rumble
Joined
Oct 7, 2022
Messages
1,368
what? No, that isn’t how a BoD works

you’d be giving away power which could cost you a lot of money
A board makes decision by majority vote, and it’s not unusual with employee board representatives.

Some background, don’t know if they exist in England:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worker_representation_on_corporate_boards_of_directors

So it’s not the oddest idea from my POV. Do I think it would impact things? Nah. Clearly any owner would control the majority. And I mean SAF is on the board right now (I think).

To have a real impact, you must be able to impact the owner. Most issues are money issues.
 

Tarrou

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
25,725
Location
Sydney
A board makes decision by majority vote, and it’s not unusual with employee board representatives.

Some background, don’t know if they exist in England:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worker_representation_on_corporate_boards_of_directors

So it’s not the oddest idea from my POV. Do I think it would impact things? Nah. Clearly any owner would control the majority. And I mean SAF is on the board right now (I think).

To have a real impact, you must be able to impact the owner. Most issues are money issues.
they are not employees though?

a BoD exists to serve the best interests of the company and it's shareholders, so a board that exists only to serve the owner is pretty dysfunctional and not operating correctly

if, as was suggested, the fan is given the seat only to eventually just dismiss their views, that means the rest of the board are basically just proxies to agree with the owner

that is why you need a broad range of inputs, one or two finance people, a marketing person, one from ops etc.. as well as some NEDs to get some outside perspective/experience away from the cliques within the company.. that way decisions are discussed and debated in an efficient manner and good decisions are made

having one fan on there would disrupt the balance completely... you'd honestly have to be a total idiot to agree to this (as an owner)
 

BarstoolProphet

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
6,616
If endless money is your goal, Dubai isn't the one. They have no oil, no gas, they're bank rolled by Abu Dhabi.
That's a very simple view. In terms of feck you money, Dubai got that in abundance - not just as much as KSA PIF and Abu Dhabi. They have for years been working on diversifying their sources income to be able stand on their own and not be dependant on Abu Dhabi's oil income and oil in general (less than 1% stems from oil). They have built up the city as a major tourist and financial hub and are investing heavily in sustainable energy and technology. Obviously with both the financial and tourist markets being those who have been hit the hardest from COVID and global recession, their financial status and future feels more unsecure than their neighbour's energy-funded status. However, they are still a very wealthy Emirate on paper (but have a lot of loans tied up to their income) and their ICD fund is worth way more than what's ever needed to run a successful football club.
 

Solius

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Staff
Joined
Dec 31, 2007
Messages
87,046
So Beckham is in Qatar.
https://www.gloucestershirelive.co....id-beckham-inspires-england-world-7898284.amp

I see two possible reason for this:
(a) He is there to negotiate with a consortium to buy United.
(b) He is the official Ambassador of the World Cup and it wouldn’t at all be strange if he was there in any event as a rich famous former player.

I also think that it is plausible that people from the Qatar Investment Fund is in Qatar. So he could be discussing with them, or someone else, or not at all.
It's literally this one.
 

KiD MoYeS

Good Craig got his c'nuppins
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Messages
33,039
Location
Love is Blind
So Beckham is in Qatar.
https://www.gloucestershirelive.co....id-beckham-inspires-england-world-7898284.amp

I see two possible reason for this:
(a) He is there to negotiate with a consortium to buy United.
(b) He is the official Ambassador of the World Cup and it wouldn’t at all be strange if he was there in any event as a rich famous former player.

I also think that it is plausible that people from the Qatar Investment Fund is in Qatar. So he could be discussing with them, or someone else, or not at all.
He's getting paid tens of millions to promote Qatar World Cup, of course he's in Qatar during the World Cup.
 

lsd

The Oracle
Joined
Jun 5, 2016
Messages
10,933
So Beckham is in Qatar.
https://www.gloucestershirelive.co....id-beckham-inspires-england-world-7898284.amp

I see two possible reason for this:
(a) He is there to negotiate with a consortium to buy United.
(b) He is the official Ambassador of the World Cup and it wouldn’t at all be strange if he was there in any event as a rich famous former player.

I also think that it is plausible that people from the Qatar Investment Fund is in Qatar. So he could be discussing with them, or someone else, or not at all.

He is there out off pure greed and nothing else
 
Status
Not open for further replies.