Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.

King7Eric

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
Sep 19, 2016
Messages
3,154
Location
Cardiff
It's possible to wipe all the debt and still be shit owners.

Of course everyone would prefer that the debt is gone. But it's not the only consideration.
It is by far the biggest one though. If a new owners clears our debt and invests in stadium development, then we essentially don't really need them to be investing much more in transfers etc. We are more than capable of generating enough revenue to compete with anyone without the debt burdening us.

Removing the politics of it to one side, surely wiping the debt is the biggest consideration for the fans.
 

Spoony

The People's President
Joined
Oct 27, 2001
Messages
63,277
Location
Leve Palestina.
I'm not even sure what a human being can do with that kind of money. It would also guarantee the financial security of many generations of your siblings and their offspring.

They're just greedy. They’re planning to stay around with the hope of making a tad more.
 

Balljy

Full Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2016
Messages
3,376
they're hoping we miraculously make shed load more money. Thing is, how much could they rake in as minority investors? It's all rather complicated.
I suspect that instalments are a tax benefit too. I'm not sure of the rules in the US, but capital gains would be taken and with instalments you'd have the chance of offsetting the gain on the later ones by taking on debt from whatever you end up purchasing with the cash.
 

Sultan

Gentleness adorns everything
Joined
Sep 1, 2004
Messages
48,569
Location
Redcafe
They would be banking on their shares going up in value then selling them.
No guarantees. Shares could go up or down. The price both parties are paying is already way above the market cap. Check last night's share price on the US stock market.
 

Nick7

Full Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
19,352
Location
Ireland
No guarantees. Shares could go up or down. The price both parties are paying is already way above the market cap. Check last night's share price on the US stock market.
No, but the put and call options would have strike prices that essentially guarantee them a certain price.
 

Spoony

The People's President
Joined
Oct 27, 2001
Messages
63,277
Location
Leve Palestina.
No guarantees. Shares could go up or down. The price both parties are paying is already way above the market cap. Check last night's share price on the US stock market.
19.20 USD. There's a chance it could dive if SJR take over.
 

Bosws87

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2015
Messages
3,738
Yeh, I don't think we have a clue at the moment. If the Glazers were so keen to stay on as minority shareholders they'd have already accepted SJRs bid in my opinion.
it’s more the fact people are calling this over because one bid gets the glazers 600 million extra with a couple year wait and this is being argued as the reason Jim’s got it in the bag.

The reality is with these sums waiting 3 years for that amount of cash in such a large transaction isn’t great or a clear cut win at all, which the majority of jims supporters are telling you.

its playing on the media narrative that the glazers want the most money no matter what it’s not as clear cut as that when there’s years, uncertainty and they lose majority control in the process.

it’s schools playground media reporting.
 

MDFC Manager

Full Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
24,682
It is by far the biggest one though. If a new owners clears our debt and invests in stadium development, then we essentially don't really need them to be investing much more in transfers etc. We are more than capable of generating enough revenue to compete with anyone without the debt burdening us.

Removing the politics of it to one side, surely wiping the debt is the biggest consideration for the fans.
Correct, especially when the other bidder is going to take on more loans to buy the club. INEOS already has £6bn debt on it's books. We're kidding ourselves if we believe they'll add several billions more to their debt and expect United not to service it.
 

DomesticTadpole

Doom-monger obsessed with Herrera & the M.E.N.
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
101,963
Location
Barrow In Furness
they're hoping we miraculously make shed load more money. Thing is, how much could they rake in as minority investors? It's all rather complicated.
If the ESL is dead and buried, how will they make that money? How bigger can TV deals get in it current format? Are they hoping more people get involved wanting to show the PL, which will be great for them, but rubbish for the fans yet again. They will be having to bank on the new owner turning us into a title winner again. That is far from a certainty.
 

glasgow 21

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 27, 2022
Messages
1,259
Glazers to stay having had good meetings to increase the credit facilities due to bids. Man City to win the treble. Magic, dining at Tier 2 Table for another 10 years. Look forward to watching Ten Hag be thrown under the bus due to none CL qualification. Anything other than this will be a moral victory.
 

giggs-beckham

Clueless
Joined
Sep 9, 2007
Messages
7,033
These numbers are all speculation on the numbers from the journos who could be clueless bunch
but this is what they say
Jassim 5.2B GBP EV. Glazers get 3.6B now for their 69.5%. But they will benefit also from selling their 4.3% class A shares (for 220m) because Jassim want to buy 100% of the club.
Ratcliffe 5.5B GBP EV. Glazers get 2.75B now for 50.1% of their shares and 1B for the remaining 19% in 3 years.
Does Jassim offer include the debt repayment though?
 

giggs-beckham

Clueless
Joined
Sep 9, 2007
Messages
7,033
I'm not even sure what a human being can do with that kind of money. It would also guarantee the financial security of many generations of your siblings and their offspring.
Also none of them are getting any younger. If it were me I'd want the money asap so I could enjoy it for as long as possible. Solid gold house and so on
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
As the others have said the rich always want even more.
Even in this instance?
Surely if someone decides to sell they sell up? They then have more capitol to invest etc which would result in a higher ROI instead of being scared to let go.
Obviously I don’t know what I’m talking about but indecisiveness isn’t a positive trait
 

Marcelinho87

Full Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2010
Messages
7,319
Location
Barnsley
Correct, especially when the other bidder is going to take on more loans to buy the club. INEOS already has £6bn debt on it's books. We're kidding ourselves if we believe they'll add several billions more to their debt and expect United not to service it.
You're kidding yourself by pretending to know how it works and just cluelessly throwing fits.

INEOS have 6bn debt as you say, so I'd argue they know what the feck they are doing over some geezer sat on his phone at home.
 

arthurka

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2010
Messages
18,816
Location
Rectum
Glazers to stay having had good meetings to increase the credit facilities due to bids. Man City to win the treble. Magic, dining at Tier 2 Table for another 10 years. Look forward to watching Ten Hag be thrown under the bus due to none CL qualification. Anything other than this will be a moral victory.
Absolutely this, feck that.
 

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,687
Surely they could make more money sticking the damn the lot in a bank?
Not really, you have to invest such funds and they all have risk. They may see United as a safer opportunity given they already know the company inside out.
 

red thru&thru

Full Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
7,657
The deal with SJR is so complicated. Would be very risky for the Glazers. A few downsides for SJR, too. Sheikh Jassim's bid is a lot cleaner. Makes more sense.

I just don't see how the Glazers won't accept Sheikh Jassim's.
 

IRONTUSK

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 9, 2021
Messages
117
I just hope that the news that Qatar might pull out on Friday is true...not because I don`t want Qatar. I don`t really favour Qatar or SJR they both have +/- but we might actually finally be a step closer to this being sorted out.
If they pull out it`s SJR surely!
 

MDFC Manager

Full Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
24,682
You're kidding yourself by pretending to know how it works and just cluelessly throwing fits.

INEOS have 6bn debt as you say, so I'd argue they know what the feck they are doing over some geezer sat on his phone at home.
Of course they know what they're doing. How's that contradictory to expect debt being serviced by United? This isn't going to be an altruistic investment, as much as you'd like it to be.
 

DomesticTadpole

Doom-monger obsessed with Herrera & the M.E.N.
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
101,963
Location
Barrow In Furness
Even in this instance?
Surely if someone decides to sell they sell up? They then have more capitol to invest etc which would result in a higher ROI instead of being scared to let go.
Obviously I don’t know what I’m talking about but indecisiveness isn’t a positive trait
Which is why our transfers end up a bloody mess. The longer this goes on our transfer window could be in ruins. You or me would take the money and run, if it is Avram and Joel who are driving this then it is not surprising they are dithering. You wonder how the other four think or do the other two just ride roughshod over their siblings?
 

LawCharltonBest

Enjoys watching fox porn
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,764
Location
Salford
The deal with SJR is so complicated. Would be very risky for the Glazers. A few downsides for SJR, too. Sheikh Jassim's bid is a lot cleaner. Makes more sense.

I just don't see how the Glazers won't accept Sheikh Jassim's.
I'm fairly neutral and just want the Glazers gone (and a few other things that I'd get banned if I said)

Yeah I see the point that a full transaction is simpler, but wouldn't the aftermath of an agreement with Sheikh Jassim be much more complicated? The approvals they'd need etc could take some time and he'd have a much higher chance of being denied, by which point Ineos may have either walked away or be in an excellent negotiating position to get the price lowered.

Ineos already own football clubs and other sports club, with Sir Jim having attended United games in his younger days he probably won't have much to prove in his reasons for buying the club. All in all, I'd imagine the approval side of it would be quite straightforward once the negotiations are done
 

Marcelinho87

Full Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2010
Messages
7,319
Location
Barnsley
Of course they know what they're doing. How's that contradictory to expect debt being serviced by United? This isn't going to be an altruistic investment, as much as you'd like it to be.
United will continue to service the debt in its name, hopefully with an actual plan.

But no way on this earth will we be expected to service the debt INEOS takes on, otherwise why would they take it and not just lump it on United... INEOS can service that debt easily, no issue.
 

tombombadil

Full Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2010
Messages
2,898
Location
Some god forsaken part of Middle Earth
The timing of the Glazer sale is extremely telling.
1) The collapse of ESL means there will be no foreseeable jump in revenue for the near future
2) Rising interest rates means costs are going dramatically up
3) Liverpool announcing their sale could suck up the last bits of appetite for takeovers, especially after seeing the Chelsea and Newcastle takeovers.

Glazers saw the writing on the wall, got desperate and decided to sell. They're now just using the ENEOS bid to yank the Qatari's chain to try and squeeze whatever ounce of money they can out of this deal.
 

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,527
Location
Birmingham
The deal with SJR is so complicated. Would be very risky for the Glazers. A few downsides for SJR, too. Sheikh Jassim's bid is a lot cleaner. Makes more sense.

I just don't see how the Glazers won't accept Sheikh Jassim's.
The only thing the Glazers care about is who is offering more money for each of their shares. Jassim's bid doesn't do that.
 

cheekybackheel

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 28, 2023
Messages
225
I've said it once before, but the Glazers can take their time regardless of what fans want or what's good for the club.

I fully suspect its a lot more simple than people are thinking, they just want Qatar to up their bid and they will be off. They can take their time and milk it for all its worth because at the very least, they have SJRs bid already in the bank where they get some money now and some money later, whilst staying on.

It's probably nothing more than the other 4 saying 'sell up now, let's be done with it' whilst the other 2 say 'we will but let's just push it one more time for a bit more cash then we'll be done..'

People overcomplicate most scenarios, human behaviour virtually always comes down the basics....greed, power, fear etc etc.
 

Bosws87

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2015
Messages
3,738
The only thing the Glazers care about is who is offering more money for each of their shares. Jassim's bid doesn't do that.
That’s just not true and half the problem with the media reports. If Jassim offered more but said I’ll give you in 10 years down the line they wouldn’t accept, this narrative is nonsense.

Theres a nuance to waiting years for x amount more it’s not as simple as one bid is bigger then the other.
 

Lentwood

Full Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Messages
6,940
Location
West Didsbury, Manchester
The timing of the Glazer sale is extremely telling.
1) The collapse of ESL means there will be no foreseeable jump in revenue for the near future
2) Rising interest rates means costs are going dramatically up
3) Liverpool announcing their sale could suck up the last bits of appetite for takeovers, especially after seeing the Chelsea and Newcastle takeovers.

Glazers saw the writing on the wall, got desperate and decided to sell. They're now just using the ENEOS bid to yank the Qatari's chain to try and squeeze whatever ounce of money they can out of this deal.
Despite all the negativity and people jumping to the worst possible conclusions, this is also my take.

People fail to appreciate that owning United has ceased to be very profitable for the Glazers. They're billionaires, these piddly £5-10m dividends they occasionally take barely heat the swimming pools in their 7th homes.

They know the Qataris have limitless wealth. I believe (hope) they are using the SJR bid to drive the price up
 

George The Best

Full Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
2,144
Location
Nut Megging
I just hope that the news that Qatar might pull out on Friday is true...not because I don`t want Qatar. I don`t really favour Qatar or SJR they both have +/- but we might actually finally be a step closer to this being sorted out.
If they pull out it`s SJR surely!
Worst scenario is that the Glazer’s pull out of both bids.
 

Andy_Cole

Full Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2009
Messages
8,066
Location
Manchester
The only thing the Glazers care about is who is offering more money for each of their shares. Jassim's bid doesn't do that.
Very simple conclusion which is wrong.

We don't know what they want, here's a breakdown of it:
1. Do they want the most per share like you say?
2. Do they want money now or happy with later?
3. Most importantly, do they want to keep a share in the club? This is the deciding factor. If they do in fact want this (media reports say this has caused a dispute in the family as 2/6 do) then they will pick Jim. Otherwise it has do be Jassim winning this.
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
32,486
SJR is the more serious one isn't he. Money aside at least he turned up to the fecking meetings in person :lol:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.