I'm begining to think the most likely scenario is that a credible shell buyer (maybe linked to Dubai) will buy us through a holding company which will then itself get bought by the real purchasers, Saudi Arabia, once they've dumped Newcastle. Needless to say this is incredibly corrupt practice but politically it stacks up.
1. The “real” acquisition of Manchester United will take place buy someone agreeing with the Glazers’ to buy their shares. However, the “formal” acquisition must be made through one of a couple alternatives set out in the Cayman Island companies act (Manchester United plc is a caymanian company).
2. Most likely, the “formal” acquisition of Manchester United plc will be made by a merger between a so called SPV (special purpose vehicle, which will be a newly incorporated company registered in the Cayman) merging with Manchester United plc where the old owners of Manchester United plc get cash as merger consideration and the owner of the SPV get 100% of the shares in the SPV.
3. There have been some talk about the Glazer’s settling the debt before selling.
Normally, the debt is baked into the purchase price. You always negotiate what a company will be worth — on a net debt and cash basis. Like remember, the buyer has no clue how much debt and cash will be in the company (club) the same day they acquire the control of it. It’s mostly irrelevant. So you negotiate a value for the company/club, say 6bn, on a net debt and cash basis. Then when the transaction is closed, you basically take 6bn and deduct the debt, say 1bn, and add the cash in the company/club say 250mn, and pay 5.25bn as a result.
4. All credit agreements always includes a Change of Control clause, resulting that the debt falls due immediately when the merger is effectuated. Hence, all debt of a target company is always refinanced.
5. For me, whether there is debt or not in the company/club is more or less irrelevant. Often debt is good for tax reasons.