Harry P letting off a single party popper and handing Plant a half pint of shandy bass - in a plastic cup, in an otherwise empty pub, while ‘I’m Not In Love’ by 10cc plays on the jukebox, at half speed.
How dare they!Swedish Rumble
Talks about English Premier League
Profile pic is from Netherlands
I also love my mum.I would protect my sources even under torture or imprisonment
We're being told INEOS is to big to have any trouble with loan servicing, all by themselves.Borrowing costs have gone up quite a lot in the last few days - Gilts at nearly 4.2%. I think we need a cash buyer.
It was me trying to fit in with the awesome reason on display in this thread.I have read this, and your previous post in this thread, and I have absolutely no idea what you are saying. The words are like absurdist/imagist poems.
Don’t worry about it, @Shakesey has these random outbursts from time to time. Either that or he’s been sat chatting to GPT again
I can see what you're going for with Mount but I'm not sure there are any circumstances that wouldn't have seen us linked to Kane. Even in a world where we had absolutely no interest and he was desperate to renew at Spurs his agent would have to be grossly negligent for the press not to be talking up his chances of coming here.Mount, Kane....these does sound INEOS type of signings
Kane is an excellent player but he's also 29 and he'll cost a bomb. When you take in account Bruno, Eriksen, Casemiro and Martial in account then United will be left with a huge rebuilding process in 4 years time. You'll expect our transfer department (DOF, scouts etc) could come with with different names to two from the local pond especially considering the fees involved with these two transfers. You'll also expect that transfers would head at a standstill during a takeover unless, there would be minimum change (Sir Jim Ratzer?) which therefore means that most of the people currently in command will still remain at the club.I can see what you're going for with Mount but I'm not sure there are any circumstances that wouldn't have seen us linked to Kane. Even in a world where we had absolutely no interest and he was desperate to renew at Spurs his agent would have to be grossly negligent for the press not to be talking up his chances of coming here.
Honestly, you are fckin relentless. Can't help but laugh at you, at the same time also clap a little bit at your relentlessness.Kane is an excellent player but he's also 29 and he'll cost a bomb. When you take in account Bruno, Eriksen, Casemiro and Martial in account then United will be left with a huge rebuilding process in 4 years time. You'll expect our transfer department (DOF, scouts etc) could come with with different names to two from the local pond especially considering the fees involved with these two transfers. You'll also expect that transfers would head at a standstill during a takeover unless, there would be minimum change (Sir Jim Ratzer?) which therefore means that most of the people currently in command will still remain at the club.
Ok.Honestly, you are fckin relentless. Can't help but laugh at you, at the same time also clap a little bit at your relentlessness.
Yes more INEOS, except if looking at the current recruitment team they may have chosen that profile of player. The groundwork may have been done. The manager ok'ed the strategy.I can see what you're going for with Mount but I'm not sure there are any circumstances that wouldn't have seen us linked to Kane. Even in a world where we had absolutely no interest and he was desperate to renew at Spurs his agent would have to be grossly negligent for the press not to be talking up his chances of coming here.
So what would a Qatar type of signing be? Mbappe? Neymar? Messi?Mount, Kane....these does sound INEOS type of signings
Definitely not Mount.So what would a Qatar type of signing be? Mbappe? Neymar? Messi?
…………yes?So what would a Qatar type of signing be? Mbappe? Neymar? Messi?
I doubt anyone is stumping up £5bn in cash. Given you have to show where the money comes from it's not particularly easy to make £5bn appear from nowhere and claim you found it down the back of the sofa.Borrowing costs have gone up quite a lot in the last few days - Gilts at nearly 4.2%. I think we need a cash buyer.
This doesn't seem to be a reply to my post?Kane is an excellent player but he's also 29 and he'll cost a bomb. When you take in account Bruno, Eriksen, Casemiro and Martial in account then United will be left with a huge rebuilding process in 4 years time. You'll expect our transfer department (DOF, scouts etc) could come with with different names to two from the local pond especially considering the fees involved with these two transfers. You'll also expect that transfers would head at a standstill during a takeover unless, there would be minimum change (Sir Jim Ratzer?) which therefore means that most of the people currently in command will still remain at the club.
that's good as I'm sure at least 30 people have you on ignore by nowMeans as much as an illiterate person telling me they’re not going to read my text.
Yet anyone who is concerned about Qatar is either a massive racist or secretly a Glazer collaborator who never wants United to win the league again.Is that is the sort of sweeping generalisation and prejudice you would expect from somebody who stands in the way of racism?
pot, kettle and black my friend, do not group people together, presume their beliefs, motivations and morals and then damn them one and all with the same criticism
your post stinks of hypocrisy and a lack of self understanding
Mount would be a perfectly reasonable signing. A far better option than spending all summer chasing Neymar.Mount, Kane....these does sound INEOS type of signings
they are two different type of players thoughYet anyone who is concerned about Qatar is either a massive racist or secretly a Glazer collaborator who never wants United to win the league again.
Mount would be a perfectly reasonable signing. A far better option than spending all summer chasing Neymar.
I apologise for that. In my part of world when we agree on something we simply fly over it and point on something we might disagree upon. Yeah I agree with what you've said 100%This doesn't seem to be a reply to my post?
yeah that was my point! making assumptions, grouping people together and criticising them as a class is wrong irrespective of whether you agree with them or not!Yet anyone who is concerned about Qatar is either a massive racist or secretly a Glazer collaborator who never wants United to win the league again.
Mount would be a perfectly reasonable signing. A far better option than spending all summer chasing Neymar.
Ahh, fair enough.I apologise for that. In my part of world when we agree on something we simply fly over it and point on something we might disagree upon. Yeah I agree with what you've said 100%
I know we should avoid Neymar, but Mount .Mount would be a perfectly reasonable signing. A far better option than spending all summer chasing Neymar.
Thats only according to one source though.So were supposed to hear this week/tomorrow , not long to go.
Could quite easily be a clause in either parties agreement that depends on Champions League qualification i.e. terms of payment, price, budgets etc so not out of the question.There's a slight possibility we might hear tomorrow or saturday if we guarantee CL football after the Chelsea game tonight. Im not holding my breath though.
Pfft good point and hes absolutely useless. No one else is reporting it.Thats only according to one source though.
Can't wait for the sale to be held up until after the US tour due to attendance of Glazers to then sale is held up after round 6 as Glazers wait to see how new season is progressing. The though that CL qualification is dependent to close any deal surely can't have any base in fact.Could quite easily be a clause in either parties agreement that depends on Champions League qualification i.e. terms of payment, price, budgets etc so not out of the question.
Marty Mcfly is that you? Very specific time the new owners are going to be around for 17 years!Pfft good point and hes absolutely useless. No one else is reporting it.
Focus on the football i suppose. Hard to when this literally forms the future of the club for the next 17 years...
Manchester Saint-GermainSo what would a Qatar type of signing be? Mbappe? Neymar? Messi?
MSG, the yanks would love us.Manchester Saint-Germain
CL qualification isn't necessarily dependent for a deal, but in terms of releasing a statement about the buyout it sounds a lot better for the Glazers if they hand over the reigns knowing it's in the bag, it just makes them look, sound and feel better.Can't wait for the sale to be held up until after the US tour due to attendance of Glazers to then sale is held up after round 6 as Glazers wait to see how new season is progressing. The though that CL qualification is dependent to close any deal surely can't have any base in fact.
Nobody uses MSG quite like the Chinese, it's in every dish.MSG, the yanks would love us.
if the star and mirror are sh!t, surely all the papers are too.Can we stop posting shit sources please.
do you really think any of the papers are that much better? others had the story tooThe daily star? Seriously?
well, let's just close down the caf, shall we?You realise you don't get a choice so none of this matters?
We will (probably) get knew owners, and will we have to give them time and hope they are compitent.