How is that stupid. Can you fit the majority of a 1000 into 10? Your maths is clearly a weakness if you come to the answer of yes.
The royal estate contains about 1000 properties. Is this what you're debating?
Just accept you made a stupid comment and move on. Acceptance is very importance.
Surely you mean the Crown Estate - there are a number of Royal Estates such as Sandringham or Balmoral which combined are over 60,000 acres of land and we're not privy to the earnings in any case if there indeed are any keeping them self sufficient. There are another 18 estates, palaces or residences from Buckingham Palace to Highgrove, in Gloucestershire or Hillsborough Castle to Clarence House. Some have limited areas open to the public for a small portion of the year but don't add up to a big hill of beans which could match the income earned by the Civil Service on behalf of the people keeping 75% of the income and awarding 25% to the King which last year was about £65mn. The Crown Estate comprises rental property, the odd Shopping Mall but mostly the coast and seabed around the UK. Awarded to the Royal Family by their ancestors but given over to the Treasury to run by George III. It's one of the largest Property Management organisations in the UK.
So, businesses run by not royals that benefit royals but should belong to the people, I mean, what individual around the World owns their country's seabed?
I was informed that the security for todays fun was to cost £100mn, the whole affair nearer £250mn. So the King is given £86mn a year stipend, he can count on maybe another £60mn earned for him by the people again this year. In total £146mn maybe apart from what at the residences, estates and two duchy's make, Lancaster and Cornwall which we are never privy to he could maybe have had a bit of change over if he'd pay just the security element.
The Royal Family don't pay for themselves, the Treasury mostly does with the property that the royal family inherited and was taken by their ancestors and the people's taxes.