Danny Welbeck

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,428
Rashford is the better goalscorer.

Welbeck is the better footballer.
 

Offside

Euro 2016 sweepstake winner
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
26,776
Location
London
Tbf Welbeck 11/12 was better than the current Rashford. Really good all round game and could actually put the ball in the net. But Rashford in his prime (first half of 19/20) was threatening to be an absolutely top player. I don’t think there is much of a debate to be honest.
 

Drainy

Full Member
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
14,863
Location
Dissin' Your Flygirl
I was Welbeck's biggest fan, but he was always a great team player who linked things up, got stuck in and chipped in with 1 in 2-3 games as a striker. Which is fine when you have goals from out wide and number 10.

Rashford is more of a match winner from individual quality, Welbeck was about incremental winning of battles and making sure your decisive players can win it.
 

Hammondo

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2015
Messages
6,970
Welbeck is a better footballer, though scored some really nice goals he was inconsistent with them.

As others have said Rashford does well with space, when we played defensive counter attacking he scored goals consistently.

In a top team though you need what welbeck has, in our failure seasons we have been complaining we don't have more players like welbeck for a reason.
 

Lay

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
Jan 29, 2013
Messages
20,145
Location
England
Probably two of the most frustrating players we’ve had. I never rated Welbeck but he did work hard. Still would rather have peak Rashford
 

SilentWitness

ShoelessWitness
Staff
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
30,792
Supports
Everton
I think Welbeck (at his best) suited his time and Rashford (at his best) suits this period. Both different types of players as a left sided forward but both as productive albeit in different ways.
 

Orion.

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 7, 2022
Messages
150
Prime Welbeck would be the perfect foil for current Ronaldo - a player who is the focal point to occupy defenders and do his battling for him.
He was a very good footballer.
 

Paul_Scholes18

Full Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2014
Messages
13,891
Still miss Welbeck. He was quality apart from the injuries and his inability to score the easy goals.

He was not a star striker for a top side, but a good squad player.

His linkup play was always really good and I think his partnership with Rooney was top class before Rooney had declined too much.

I think it was an error letting him go, but given his injury record since then it worked out quite well.
Problem is have we replaced him well? I say no. LVG wanted Wilson to replace him, but he was not good enough.
We then tried with older star strikers, but always lacked strikers on the bench. Martial and Rashford has not been good enough either.
 

Annouchez

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 21, 2018
Messages
36
I got real scared when I saw that a thread about Danny Welbeck was the top post. I calmed down when I saw it wasn’t in the transfer forum! I wouldn’t put it past post-Fergie United to miss out on Nunez and then sign Welbeck…
 

Tap

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 5, 2021
Messages
527
I’ll have a fit Welbeck over this current Rashford. He’s a great team player, brings others into play and is a hard worker. Not world class and has a tendency to f up goal scoring opportunities but definitely a good and useful squad player to have.
 

VorZakone

What would Kenny G do?
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
33,092
How is Welbeck a better footballer? Rashford IMO is better in all facets except for heading.
 

Foxbatt

New Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
14,297
How is Welbeck a better footballer? Rashford IMO is better in all facets except for heading.
And Welbeck is the much better team player and makes a much better effort. I agree that Rashford is much more talented than Welbeck. He is also the better scorer too.
 

Big Ben Foster

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
12,981
Location
BR -> MI -> TX
Supports
Also support Vasco da Gama
If you combined the best attributes of the two, you'd have a complete forward
 

AshRK

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
12,201
Location
Canada
Funny how people have suddenly started to overrate him. The guy was a mediocre player who was rightly sold. The guy performed worse for Arsenal. Played under two great managers in PL and couldn't crack it. Rashford is miles ahead of him.
 

Revaulx

Full Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Messages
6,046
Location
Saddleworth
His overall game as a striker was/is vastly better than Rashford's. But I described old Danny at the time as the anti-striker: excellent at everything until it was time to put the ball in the net. Which, sadly, for a forward is pretty important.
Spot on!

One the one hand I was disappointed when he left United, because he brought stuff to the forward line than nobody else could do. On the other, he clearly didn’t deserve a guaranteed place as his finishing was miles off good enough.
 

AshRK

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
12,201
Location
Canada
I was more gutted when we sold Chicharito than Danny. Goals wins you matches and danny could never be trusted as a forward
 

Paul_Scholes18

Full Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2014
Messages
13,891
Spot on!

One the one hand I was disappointed when he left United, because he brought stuff to the forward line than nobody else could do. On the other, he clearly didn’t deserve a guaranteed place as his finishing was miles off good enough.
Agree he was not a certain starter, but a good squad player. Thought he worked well with both Rooney and Van Persie. Had a better partnership with both then they had together. Although Rooney and Persie much more clinical.
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,409
It was tedious for about 5 years after where every time Welbeck occasionally scored there would be loads of "och shouldn't have sold him" posts.
 

Revaulx

Full Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Messages
6,046
Location
Saddleworth
It was tedious for about 5 years after where every time Welbeck occasionally scored there would be loads of "och shouldn't have sold him" posts.
This was particularly ridiculous given that scoring was probably the weakest part of Welbeck’s game.
 

Lee565

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2019
Messages
5,097
There was a period where he did look really good after we sold him to arsenal and then he had that awful injury and never recovered from
 

lost7

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 31, 2020
Messages
825
Maguire is so slow, makes him look like the fastest player in the league
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,048
Location
Moscow
He's been outstanding. Really glad for him.
 

Trequarista10

Full Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2020
Messages
2,547
Stark reminder that players who weren't good enough for us 8 years ago are better than our many of our current options.

If they were born in the same year, Welbeck would have had a better United career than Rashford imo, injuries aside.

Although tbf, it's easier for Welbeck to impress today given he's playing for the superior team.
 

Red_toad

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2010
Messages
11,617
Location
DownUnder
Shame our forwards aren’t allowed to point to where they wish the midfielders to play the ball and our midfielders given all the time in the world to play said passes.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,416
Location
Hollywood CA
He is obviously incentivized to raise his game against us, which he frequently does. Quality mid table player beyond that, nothing more.
 

Canuckred64

Full Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2007
Messages
3,638
Location
Canada
Can't say Welbeck has changed any since he played for us. Great work rate, always gets himself in the best position to score, but couldn't put the ball in the net to save his life.