Idxomer
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2014
- Messages
- 15,601
Rashford is the better goalscorer.
Welbeck is the better footballer.
Welbeck is the better footballer.
Yes exactlyRashford is the better goalscorer.
Welbeck is the better footballer.
And Welbeck is the much better team player and makes a much better effort. I agree that Rashford is much more talented than Welbeck. He is also the better scorer too.How is Welbeck a better footballer? Rashford IMO is better in all facets except for heading.
Spot on!His overall game as a striker was/is vastly better than Rashford's. But I described old Danny at the time as the anti-striker: excellent at everything until it was time to put the ball in the net. Which, sadly, for a forward is pretty important.
Agree he was not a certain starter, but a good squad player. Thought he worked well with both Rooney and Van Persie. Had a better partnership with both then they had together. Although Rooney and Persie much more clinical.Spot on!
One the one hand I was disappointed when he left United, because he brought stuff to the forward line than nobody else could do. On the other, he clearly didn’t deserve a guaranteed place as his finishing was miles off good enough.
Yeah Jack. Danny played with the likes of Rooney in a Sir Alex team whilst Rashford has broken through in the midst of our worst run since the great man.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
This was particularly ridiculous given that scoring was probably the weakest part of Welbeck’s game.It was tedious for about 5 years after where every time Welbeck occasionally scored there would be loads of "och shouldn't have sold him" posts.
He is a poor/average scorer but a very good footballer.He is average, we are just complete crap. Gross scored twice ffs.
No, but he'd be 2nd choice after RonaldoHe would start up top for us now
sad
very very sad