Physiocrat
Has No Mates
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2010
- Messages
- 9,031
Drop all three. It's a tournament. You can't wait for your favourites to play themselves into form.At least he's been better than the awful Kane and Foden
Drop all three. It's a tournament. You can't wait for your favourites to play themselves into form.At least he's been better than the awful Kane and Foden
That's a pretty low bar though. Barely been better as well.At least he's been better than the awful Kane and Foden
Foden was better, Kane is arguable.At least he's been better than the awful Kane and Foden
Yeah right, he's been rubbishFoden was better, Kane is arguable.
He has been rubbish, still better than sterling.Yeah right, he's been rubbish
Foden has been terrible. Sterling at least has a goal and an acceptable enough first game to his advantage.Foden was better, Kane is arguable.
He's not. He's been better than Kane and Sterling for starters.Foden has been terrible.
Doesn't like none PL English players from the looks of it.I don't get the refusal to play Bellingham. He is a first-teamer for a Champion's
. He is a first-teamer for a Champion's League level side, but Southgate doesn't consider him good enough to get in over Phillips or Rice.
Sterling seems to have an automatic first-team place based on nothing. It is good Saka is getting a game, but surely Sancho should be in the team.
No he hasn’t, Sterling at least has a goal and a decent enough first game to his name. Foden has done nothing.He's not. He's been better than Kane and Sterling for starters.
Sterling didn't have a decent enough first game. He's been poor and he's been poor the majority of the season hence him being dropped by his clubNo he hasn’t, Sterling at least has a goal and a decent enough first game to his name. Foden has done nothing.
3 shots, 1 key pass, 1 goal.Sterling didn't have a decent enough first game. He's been poor and he's been poor the majority of the season hence him being dropped by his club
Sterling has been fecking gash both games let’s not beat around the bush.No he hasn’t, Sterling at least has a goal and a decent enough first game to his name. Foden has done nothing.
This proves sterling has been good does it?3 shots, 1 key pass, 1 goal.
Vs.
1 shot, 0 key passes, 0 goals.
Hmmm, I wonder which attacker did more.
No, it’s proves he’s done more than Foden who’s been fexking terrible. I don’t think any of the forwards have been “good”. Kane and Foden have been the worst though, offered absolutely nothing.This proves sterling has been good does it?
Well yes if you judge entire performance levels by three basic stats.No, it’s proves he’s done more than Foden who’s been fexking terrible.
I judged Foden with my eyes, and he was shite, posed zero threat. I checked the stats to see if that backed my up, it did.Well yes if you judge entire performance levels by three basic stats.
These analysts have it easy!
No it doesn’t - bollocks statsThis proves sterling has been good does it?
Not a single poster is claiming Sterling’s been good, do keep laughing.No it doesn’t - bollocks stats
Should have gone to Specsavers.I judged Foden with my eyes, and he was shite, posed zero threat. I checked the stats to see if that backed my up, it did.
Yes I knowNo it doesn’t - bollocks stats
Absolutely gash, has offered nothing.The goodwill that Foden has on this forum is cringeworthy - he’s been fecking rubbish yet people are defending him!
wow, you just come up with that?Should have gone to Specsavers.
Nope. Sterling did well in the first game and more than the other two did in two games combined. Not that I think he should start. It should be Grealish /Rashford and SanchoHe has been rubbish, still better than sterling.
Foden has been shit, utter shit. Sterling just slightly better.Well yes if you judge entire performance levels by three basic stats.
These analysts have it easy!