Yeah, but the difference between us and Chelsea and Newcastle is that even though they've had multiple injuries also, they haven't struggled to score goals.
We have a -1GD from our last 51 PL games. It stretches across 2 seasons. ten Hag has had Rashford, Garnacho, Antony, Bruno and Højlund available for most of the season. There's no excuse for how bad we are in attack. And when do actually score 2+ goals, we give up multiple chances at the other end. That's how you end up with these 3-2 and 4-3 scorelines. We are too chaotic. It leads to open games where we can win or lose. That's why we've lost 19 times this season. It could be more on the balance of play.
ten Hag's training methods, our pre-season preparation, and the recovery techniques we use all have to be called into question in terms of the injuries.
I think Eddie Howe should also be questioned. They press with intensity. A lack or rotation or rest could be an issue. We didn't rotate enough last season.
1) Our attack isn't good enough. I said it in the summer, and I'll say it again now: we need to add some serious firepower to this team regardless of any manager.
2) It's a team game at the end of the day. If there's a disconnect between GK and Defence, Defence and Midfield and Midfield and Attack, you will have problems. The injuries have hit us harder than most teams because we have so many weak links outside of our strongest 11 (hell, even our strongest 11 contains weaknesses). I think you're right in attributing some of the blame to our training, but then can we really moan as fans when we have been highlighting our team's work rate as a weakness for years? Ten Hag is right to try and address that and increase the player's intensity; if anything, it just helps to show who isn't good enough to cope long-term.
I'm not going to argue that we have been horrendous this season, as bad a Manchester Utd side as I've seen; however, I still think it's less bleak than under Mourinho. We are being punished right now for trying to take on a more progressive and aggressive playing style without the playing personnel. I remember a MNF from a few years ago where Carragher argued Arteta should abandon his style to try and get better short-term results being more negative. Neville argued that was short-sighted and that the very best managers will rigidly stick to their preferred style because how else can you find out who is suitable to play it? We currently are so far short of the technical and athletic profile of the top sides in world football, and those that are a good fit (i.e. Martinez and Shaw, to name a couple) have been injured all season and replaced by not only inferior players but also players completely unable to fulfil a role in this system.
That's my two cents. Get the structure right (in progress), I hope they can rectify the biggest issue for Manchester Utd - the recruitment. Give the manager the chance to make this system click with players who are actually capable of playing that style; then, we can analyse if the style itself is the problem. There's all this talk at the moment of INEOS interviewing a manager who gets what Manchester Utd is about, is willing to follow the club's game model, be progressive on the pitch and fulfil our identity of giving young players a chance. How many managers on the market actually tick as many of those boxes as Ten Hag? Thats why I'm firmly behind giving him a final chance to prove he's the man.