Honestly at this point it's becoming clear that INEOS have a similar decision making ability to the Glazers. If they haven't seen enough to know that this is completely unacceptable to a club like United, and they are fine with being a laughing stock then I would suggest that they don't appreciate what it means to be a big club.
What has been consistent for United since saf left:
- overpaying for players
- extending contracts of players to retain book value but nothing to do with what the team needs or a manager wants
- buying players who are not a manager/club priority
- buying players cause you can , not because they are necessarily part of any plan
- players downing tools
- players struggling when expectations grow
- players working less then opponents
- player drama regularly
- players stuck or kept at club when manager/player want them to leave
- at least one position in the team horribly under covered
- club facilities that some of our senior players have said are basically not up to standard
I’m sure there’s more but the compounded effect of all these things make any managers job far more difficult before a penny is spent. The club poorly spending 400 million on top of that needs to be considered when factoring in all these variables.
INEOs have actually stated this very thing, that all United managers have been undermined by this dysfunction. So for them to just take over a month ago and sack ETH immediately wouldn’t Indicate change , it would only indicate the same. Easiest and quickest thing in the world is to change manager that can feel like change.
Id argue that they’ve taken a very reflective approach to this.