Erik ten Hag - Manchester United manager

Would you allow ETH to manage the cup final before parting ways?

  • Yes

    Votes: 648 44.6%
  • No, get an interim now

    Votes: 806 55.4%

  • Total voters
    1,454
  • This poll will close: .

UnofficialDevil

Anti Scottish and Preoccupied with Donkeys.
Joined
Aug 5, 2006
Messages
19,059
Location
I'm not anti Scottish, I just wanted Moyes out.


Sack the bloody idiot and his stupid process he keeps mumbling about. Can’t challenge.. manager should never ever say that. He should say if Leicester did it we can do it, or something
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
31,852
Sack the bloody idiot and his stupid process he keeps mumbling about. Can’t challenge.. manager should never ever say that. He should say if Leicester did it we can do it, or something
That's a very daft approach. Just be frank.
 

FrantikChicken

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
2,337
Location
London
United ambition should always be to compete to win the league. Our current squad is not good enough but many teams have turned things around with 2-3 good signings. You also don’t know what type of season the others will have, there have been seasons over the years where not that much was needed to compete.

Bottom line is this type of defeatism is not something you should expect from a United manager.
It’s not defeatism don’t be ridiculous.

our new owner himself has stated multiple times that it will take 2-3 seasons to bring the club to where it needs to be (competing for trophies). You’d have to be daft to think this team is 1 transfer season away from winning the league over City and Arsenal
 

FrantikChicken

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
2,337
Location
London
This is not going to get anyone on his side, including the new owners I'd imagine. Very stupid comment to make after the season he's already endured.
The new owners themselves have said that it will be a 2-3 year process. I’m ETH out but everyone is being upset over nothing
 

Shark

@NotShark
Joined
Feb 1, 2012
Messages
26,553
Location
Ireland
It’s not defeatism don’t be ridiculous.

our new owner himself has stated multiple times that it will take 2-3 seasons to bring the club to where it needs to be (competing for trophies). You’d have to be daft to think this team is 1 transfer season away from winning the league over City and Arsenal
You simply don't state this at clubs of this magnitude. Can you imagine a manager coming out with this at Bayern, Madrid or even Chelsea even in their current state. It's just plain wrong and disrespectful given the obscene amount of money we've spent over the past two seasons especially.
 

Badunk

Shares his caf joinday with Dante
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
12,961
Location
Occupied Merseyside
The fans want to hear hope, ambition and determination. It doesn't matter what the facts are, football is our passion. We need a leader who shares that passion.
 

RuudTom83

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
5,626
Location
Manc
I knew those quotes would be jumped on...truth is no manager is coming into United and winning the league in the near future.

Throwing money at the problem isn't the solution...just ask Chelsea fans.

Plus the managers who have been praised this year like Ange, has only got Spurs to 5th, previous years Spurs have finished 8th>4th>7th. So basically no different!

It will take years for United to get back to the top. Anytime a United manager makes this observation we get the same old "United should be winning leagues blah blah blah..." when its been 10 years since the last one.

Reality sucks, but this squad is 3rd-6th in the league.
 

RedSky

Shepherd’s Delight
Scout
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
74,308
Location
Hereford FC (Soccermanager)
Thats the type of comment you make in the first 6-12 months of the job. He's been here 24 months, it'll be his 3rd season if he lasts through the Summer. It's a pretty damning statement of his own work that despite spending £400m and having 2 full seasons to train and shape the squad to his requirement we're still not (in his mind) ready to challenge for the title. He's not wrong either.
 

Bilbo

TeaBaggins
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
14,328
If INEOs, with far more information/data and context behind the scenes, believe ETH has done a poor job , he’s gone. I’ve no issue with that. But if they feel the clubs and teams issues are mostly not his fault and he may work well with whatever they have planned, then it makes sense to work with him.
It's really a damning indictment on so many posters on here that this perfectly logical and obvious statement is beyond their comprehension.
 

Stadjer

Full Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2013
Messages
7,588
Location
The Netherlands


He is right but maybe he is a bit too honest there. Fans dont want to hear that.

The argument that Manchester United should always compete for the title might sound 'strong' but our squad clearly isnt a Manchester United squad when you compare it to previous winning Manchester United squads. It isnt a Premier League winning squad either. ETH did spend quite a bit of money on the squad but so did all the other teams. Just a shame that his most expensive signing turned out to be the worst one out of the bunch.

One to three great signings also isnt going to turn this team into a title winning team. Arsenal and Manchester City are just too good to bridge that gap with a few good transfers. For the future Mainoo, Garnacho and Hojlund will hopefully become part of a Premier League winning team but currently they need more time to become players that are of Premier League winning quality. I think we need to add players around them so when Mainoo, Garnacho and Hojlund are hopefully developed into Premier League quality winning players, they have the help they will need.
 

NLunited

Full Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2015
Messages
3,844
Location
US
This is not going to get anyone on his side, including the new owners I'd imagine. Very stupid comment to make after the season he's already endured.
I think it is the opposite. The owners are doing a thorough assessment of the club and know the things Ten Hag just said are spot on.

We need to close the gap. It doesn’t look like it this season, but we have put key pieces in place to do that: Onana, Højlund and Mount.

Next are Casemiro and Varane replacements, a striker and a full back, at the minimum.

We have good players coming up from the youth teams. Maybe we don’t challenge for the title next season, but the future looks good.
 

Escobar

Shameless Musketeer
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
30,233
Location
La-La-Land
Why would we not be challenging? I know we have a mediocre squad and problems on the pitch, but ffs it is his 3rd season and he is responsible for results and improvements
 

Shark

@NotShark
Joined
Feb 1, 2012
Messages
26,553
Location
Ireland
It's really a damning indictment on so many posters on here that this perfectly logical and obvious statement is beyond their comprehension.
There's absolutely nothing logical about that statement. This manager has spent 400m across two seasons, and if he survives will have the fresh backing of new owners wanting to make a statement in the summer.
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,548
The glazers dont want to try to win the league, never have, and they've finally got a manager who's happy to just come out and say it.

And gaslight the media and fans for daring to point out his lack of ability/lack of ambition.
 

Bilbo

TeaBaggins
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
14,328
There's absolutely nothing logical about that statement. This manager has spent 400m across two seasons, and if he survives will have the fresh backing of new owners wanting to make a statement.
Who could possibly be in a better position to decide whether he deserves another season than INEOS? Think about it
 

Ollie Derbyshire

Full Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2016
Messages
2,305
Thats the type of comment you make in the first 6-12 months of the job. He's been here 24 months, it'll be his 3rd season if he lasts through the Summer. It's a pretty damning statement of his own work that despite spending £400m and having 2 full seasons to train and shape the squad to his requirement we're still not (in his mind) ready to challenge for the title. He's not wrong either.
Exactly my thoughts, he’s not wrong, we aren’t good enough to challenge but he’s a huge factor in why we aren’t.
 

spwd

likes: servals, breasts, rylan clark and zooey
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Messages
8,800
Location
Lyecestershyre
Amad has had opportunities to show something and hasn‘t except for Pool game in FA cup. He just needs to take his chances when they come.

To start him over Rashford is a bit bonkers imo. Even out of form, Rashford is still better right now.
I never said he should start in place of Rashford but he wouldn't be any worse anyway. I was talking about Anthony and Forson and I think there was someone else too.

The opportunities he's been given have been ridiculously low especially after he scored that goal. He's basically frozen him out or put him on for a few minutes to waste time.
I said if he had played as many minutes as Anthony has I'm positive he would have proved that he is good enough and more productive than Anthony or anyone else who's been given minutes instead of him.
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,548
Who could possibly be in a better position to decide whether he deserves another season than INEOS? Think about it
Probably literally any of the fans, who have been watching United and following the club for a lot longer than Brailsford or anyone else at Ineos have. Have they forensically followed the trials and tribulations of Erik ten Hag? Have they even watched every game this season. I seriously doubt it.
 

OldTrevil

Full Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2013
Messages
2,896
I'm as frustrated as anyone about our season and the way he has gone about managing the perennial under-performers, but I still think it could turn out a calamitous decision getting rid of him without first addressing the playing squad, in a football wise manner for once. The people in charge of football have a lot of problems to address, and getting rid of a manager who incidentally has only one year left on his contract is unnecessarily adding to the complexity of their problems.

I would first address the issue of players in line with the agreed upon play style, using input from the manager as he knows all the current player limitations. Then let him have his final contract year, at which point you are also able to assess potential manager replacements in case performances don't improve as had been agreed, in a relatively calm period compared to the player recruitment circus of the summer window.
 

Shark

@NotShark
Joined
Feb 1, 2012
Messages
26,553
Location
Ireland
Probably literally any of the fans, who have been watching United and following the club for a lot longer than Brailsford or anyone else at Ineos have. Have they forensically followed the trials and tribulations of Erik ten Hag? Have they even watched every game this season. I seriously doubt it.
Correct. The idea that we require all of this supposed data that INEOS are collecting to make a definitive decision on ETH is complete nonsense. We can also use our eyes, and anyone with a pair of them can see the manager is deeply struggling with English football and the way we went out of the CL, in that group, should also be a damning indicator.
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,548
I'm as frustrated as anyone about our season and the way he has gone about managing the perennial under-performers, but I still think it could turn out a calamitous decision getting rid of him without first addressing the playing squad, in a football wise manner for once. The people in charge of football have a lot of problems to address, and getting rid of a manager who incidentally has only one year left on his contract is unnecessarily adding to the complexity of their problems.

I would first address the issue of players in line with the agreed upon play style, using input from the manager as he knows all the current player limitations. Then let him have his final contract year, at which point you are also able to assess potential manager replacements in case performances don't improve as had been agreed, in a relatively calm period compared to the player recruitment circus of the summer window.
No, the exact opposite. Keeping a manager who only has a year left is unnecessarily adding to the complexity of the problems.

He only has a year left because no one above him rates the job he's done here. So why keep a proven loser who publicly isn't being backed by his own paymasters? Senseless.

How do you sign the right players to come and rescue the failed football project of a guy who is, rightly, getting no backing? :lol:
 

Chumpsbechumps

Full Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2018
Messages
2,635
Probably literally any of the fans, who have been watching United and following the club for a lot longer than Brailsford or anyone else at Ineos have. Have they forensically followed the trials and tribulations of Erik ten Hag? Have they even watched every game this season. I seriously doubt it.
I’ve been watching United alot longer and I’m a fan and I don’t agree with you. My summary is ETH would be sacked under any normal circumstances, but there’s been anything but that at United since Ragnick was let go so I don’t know how much of what we see is a failing manager or a manager at a failing club. I’d confidently say you have no more information to make an informed appraisal on this then me.

All I see in your post is “if somebody doesn’t agree with me, I will presume all objectively reasonable people do and anybody who thinks differently is wrong by default because I can’t be wrong”. I’d say, the fact that you may very well be wrong has never crossed your mind. :lol:
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,548
All I see in your post is “if somebody doesn’t agree with me, I will presume all objectively reasonable people do and anybody who thinks differently is wrong by default because I can’t be wrong”. :lol:
I'm not wrong about how ETH's United tenure will end up.

The only questions left are whether he will leave us with 1 cup to his name or 2. And whether he'll be allowed to drag us backwards for another season or not.
 

Badunk

Shares his caf joinday with Dante
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
12,961
Location
Occupied Merseyside
Fans tend to exaggerate the amount of players needed to challenge for the title. They think we need to sell ten and bring ten in. But, quite often, just one or two can make a huge difference. By their ability or leadership, or a combination of both, they can make others around them much better. Bruno did that for us. Cantona did. Suárez did for Liverpool. Maradona carried club and country on his back virtually his whole career. That's why he shouldn't be as honest as he has been. You never know what can happen in a season. To concede the title before a ball's been kicked is the wrong thing to do, in my opinion.
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,548
He can't win either way

Just a false dichotomy.

The squad isn't good enough partly because he's blown £440m to not tangibly improve it at all. And partly because his brand of football makes it perform worse than the sum of its parts.

So he's the last one who gets to point to a lack of competitiveness as if it isn't entirely down to him. We should be much closer to the top after 2 seasons and massive spending, but we're not, because he is a failure.
 

Chumpsbechumps

Full Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2018
Messages
2,635
I'm not wrong about how ETH's United tenure will end up.

The only questions left are whether he will leave us with 1 cup to his name or 2. And whether he'll be allowed to drag us backwards for another season or not.
You are absolutely 100% wrong that you will have more experience then INEOs in deciding whether ETH should be sacked or kept. You don’t have a clue what INEOs restructuring involves.

You have no clue how much the clubs dramas, ownership and injuries have played on this season.

You can say “I don’t think these issues explain how bad things have been” , that’s fair. But you cannot objectively say absolutely that “none of these explain where we are at”. That’s an uninformed , subjective feeling based on what would be relatively reasonable expectation at a club that’s got pedigree at consistently doing well or bouncing back quickly from a bad managerial appointment.

I can’t tell you how delusional and wrong you and many other posters are on this. I’m betting some reading this will think “look at him defending ETH”, it’s because they don’t understand what I’m saying and they can’t comprehend that “I’m not sure on ETH, given all the stuff going on” is a perfectly reasonable position to have on this.

I think “I don’t think ETH is good enough” is equally reasonable, but the difference is those of us who can see both sides versus posters like you who are incapable of understanding the topic beyond “XG, points , possession , Anthony , 400 million spent, worst record since time began, ETH interview annoys me”…

How United got here and keep making the same mistakes over and over again is a more important issue to resolve then “sacking the manager”. It doesn’t mean the manager won’t be or shouldn’t be sacked , it’s just I think posters like you don’t see the bigger picture which is why you are so sure about yourself.
 

vibe

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
901
Location
Edge of the box
He can't win either way

Eric Ten Hag: I want direct control over which players we sign a £440 million warchest and 2 years to build the squad I want.
Eric Ten Hag 2 years later: Our squad isn't good enough to win the league, nothing I can do.

See? I can do it too. I should become a football pundit.
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,548
You are absolutely 100% wrong that you will have more experience then INEOs in deciding whether ETH should be sacked or kept. You don’t have a clue what INEOs restructuring involves.

You have no clue how much the clubs dramas, ownership and injuries have played on this season.
I have just as much/as little of a clue about how club dramas and injuries have affected us as Brailsford and Wilcox do :lol:

That's why they're going to ignore all this frivolous bollocks and evaluate ETH based on simple metrics that dont lie. Like, how much time has he had (lots). How much has been spent (lots). How much progress has been made (none).
 

spiriticon

Full Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
7,492
He's right, but it also means he's completely failed at making an impact in the time he's been here.

We were nowhere near challenging 2 years ago, and we are not any nearer now.
 

Chumpsbechumps

Full Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2018
Messages
2,635
I agree with the statement but it's not really important. The important question is whether we are closer today than we were 24 months ago?
24 months ago we had the same failed people making the same failed footballing decisions. They were overspending on targets , giving stupid contracts and looking relatively clueless.

We have a new owner completely restructuring everything which should mean we get better value sales/buys, actually have a long term club plan that should make replacing managers easier and more efficient and have a lot of exciting looking younger players.

Looking at this season in isolation is a waste of time because the club will be run differently. SJR said something like it could be 2-3 years before we are properly challanging, so ETH is only saying what the owner has said. Doesn’t mean ETH will be our manager next year but it’s a message the club will be happy he is saying.
 

afrocentricity

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
May 12, 2005
Messages
27,150
He's right, but it also means he's completely failed at making an impact in the time he's been here.

We were nowhere near challenging 2 years ago, and we are not any nearer now.
But we thought we were right? He thought we would right? Let's not rewrite history....


We are where we are because of decisions that have been made since, we were not destined to be where we are