F1 2021 Season

RoadTrip

petitioned for a just cause
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
26,395
Location
Los Pollos Hermanos...
Exactly that.
We need to remember how low these drivers sit in the car.
It is now clear that Hamilton was completely unaware of why Verstappen was slowing and still had his car in the middle of the track.
Could have been anything in front.
And he said that he was trying to be careful.
To me, it does not look like Verstappen was deliberately 'brake testing Hamilton'.
But let's see what the Stewards decide.
I don’t think so either. But he did slow down right before the accident. But not sure if that was Hamilton speeding up as he realised he was meant to go past as he was getting the message? Or did Max slow down? Unless telemetry says otherwise, I’d give Max the benefit here. It was just a confusing situation caused by bad information sharing with the race director. Massi by the way should be out of the job. It’s common sense to tell the following car before telling the leading car, for this exact reason.
 
Joined
Jun 26, 2014
Messages
22,148
Location
Behind the right goal post as "Whiteside shoots!"
I really don’t think Max tried to purposely cause a collision, but I’m not sure. Hamilton obviously didn’t because then both crashing out only costs him.

I really just think it was confusion. Without Hamilton knowing Max was letting him through you would naturally be totally confused what was going on. Tactics? Incident up ahead? Did Max have an issue? Could be anything, because without that information it was just not normal.

I would be interested in the telemetry though. I would say Max could have just moved out the way, but he veered into the middle and then side to side a bit. And I would want to know if he slammed the brakes there or not.
Tito said he'd seen the telemetry and Max braked, accelerated, braked, etc..
 

Fully Fledged

Full Member
Joined
May 23, 2013
Messages
16,210
Location
Midlands UK
I really don’t think Max tried to purposely cause a collision, but I’m not sure. Hamilton obviously didn’t because then both crashing out only costs him.

I really just think it was confusion. Without Hamilton knowing Max was letting him through you would naturally be totally confused what was going on. Tactics? Incident up ahead? Could be anything, because without that information it was just not normal.

I would be interested in the telemetry though. I would say Max could have just moved out the way, but he veered into the middle and then side to side a bit. And I would want to know if he slammed the brakes there or not.
Max broke again to make sure that Lewis was in front of him at the DRS activation line. When he realised that that wasn't going to happen he sped back up.
 

Fluctuation0161

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2016
Messages
8,165
Location
Manchester
It clearly wasn't, because he gains nothing from brake testing him. Just as Hamilton had nothing to gain from hitting him. Max was expecting Lewis to know he was giving the place up and Lewis was just unaware because he hadn't been told.

But some people are far too rabid and bitter to understand that apparently.
Max is ahead on points. Of course he gains, even if they both DNF or if Hamilton has to pit for a new wing.

That principle has been along way before the turbo hybrid era. Its a basic.
 

Berbaclass

Fallen Muppet. Lest we never forget
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
39,045
Location
Cooper Station
It clearly wasn't, because he gains nothing from brake testing him. Just as Hamilton had nothing to gain from hitting him. Max was expecting Lewis to know he was giving the place up and Lewis was just unaware because he hadn't been told.

But some people are far too rabid and bitter to understand that apparently.
Nothing apart from protecting his lead in the WC
 

RoadTrip

petitioned for a just cause
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
26,395
Location
Los Pollos Hermanos...
Max broke again to make sure that Lewis was in front of him at the DRS activation line. When he realised that that wasn't going to happen he sped back up.
Yeah, I would like to think Max was just trying to slow down more to ensure he crossed the DRS line second, not to actually cause a collision. Ultimately, I’m finding it hard to blame either and instead think it was terrible communication from Massi - particularly the order of that communication.

But if Max did suddenly brake there, it would change my view a bit because you can’t just brake like that.
 

Buster15

Go on Didier
Joined
Aug 28, 2018
Messages
13,499
Location
Bristol
Supports
Bristol Rovers
Looking at slow motion Max drifts into the middle of a very narrow section to "allow" Lewis by. It only opens up after contact. I suspect Lewis has no idea and was in the middle of planning his overtake and then attempted to slow but was too late. Dirty by Max, error by Lewis.
If you read your post, you will see that you have contradicted yourself.
Lewis has no idea....
Error by Lewis.
They can't both be correct.
 

RoadTrip

petitioned for a just cause
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
26,395
Location
Los Pollos Hermanos...
Not sure I really understand why Hamilton would push for that point. It gets him level but only in a very very very rare and unlikely outcome would that point matter. It’s not like going even truly levels then because of race wins.
 

Balljy

Full Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2016
Messages
3,327
It clearly wasn't, because he gains nothing from brake testing him. Just as Hamilton had nothing to gain from hitting him. Max was expecting Lewis to know he was giving the place up and Lewis was just unaware because he hadn't been told.
If Hamilton had lost his wing, Verstappen would have won the title and he was probably quite lucky not to lose it in the end.

I agree that Max didn't deliberately brake test him though, although he did try to play a game or two to make a point, hence the movement to the right and left and the sudden acceleration, then slowing again.
 

hp88

Full Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2010
Messages
17,413
Location
W3103
Watching it back with the team radio, I don’t think they have done anything wrong, they told him to let him pass and he has slowed down to allow that.
 

RoadTrip

petitioned for a just cause
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
26,395
Location
Los Pollos Hermanos...
I really do think that Max did veer side to side slightly, but not in such a way that it was egregiously bad. I just think it’s awful communication from the race director. I can understand why Max is slowing down to give the spot back, and why he did it there and how he did it (he’s in his rights to get the DRS and make Lewis take an unfavourable line into the corner). I can also understand why Hamilton had no idea what was going on. Both of which would be completely avoidable if Massi had communicated the switch in the right order at the right time.
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,305
Max is ahead on points. Of course he gains, even if they both DNF or if Hamilton has to pit for a new wing.

That principle has been along way before the turbo hybrid era. Its a basic.
And so driving someone off the track makes sense. Giving no room makes sense. Something like what happened in Monza makes sense.

But no racing driver is ever going to consider taking someone out by brake testing. Worst case you're taken out, you get a penalty, and you need a new engine and gearbox. While the car behind just loses their front.

It's not like what Vettel did to Hamilton where they were crawling around behind a safety car. At race speed it's just a fools errand.
 

RoadTrip

petitioned for a just cause
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
26,395
Location
Los Pollos Hermanos...
And so driving someone off the track makes sense. Giving no room makes sense. Something like what happened in Monza makes sense.

But no racing driver is ever going to consider taking someone out by brake testing. Worst case you're taken out, you get a penalty, and you need a new engine and gearbox. While the car behind just loses their front.

It's not like what Vettel did to Hamilton where they were crawling around behind a safety car. At race speed it's just a fools errand.
For once, I think we agree! My only caveat to that is if either a) it becomes the case Hamilton knew Max was letting him past, and still went slowly - although this seems unlikely. Or b) telemetry shows Max braked hard just in front of Max. Even in this case I don’t think the intention was to cause a collision, but in that case he has to take responsibility for it happening because you just can’t do that.
 

Dan_F

Full Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
10,406
One thing that’s gone under the radar is all the punishments were basically irrelevant anyway. Max’s tyre’s went off so much that Hamilton would have made it past eventually, if he wasn’t taken out.

That’s before you even think about how much wear Max gained back by spending loads of time under SC and VSC. There’s a good chance he would have had to pit again right?
 

Redlambs

Creator of the Caftards comics
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Messages
42,249
Location
Officially the best poker player on RAWK.
Bit rich of Horner to claim Hamilton was playing for the DRS zone, when that's pretty much the instruction they gave Max :lol: But yeah, it seems to be both a bit of that and terrible communication from the race control. Surely they should always tell the car behind first.

I hope Max didn't extra brake after lifting off, as his positioning was slightly dodgy enough to make it a big problem if he did. I don't really care who wins, I just want the last race to be head to head on points and podium :drool:
 

Fluctuation0161

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2016
Messages
8,165
Location
Manchester
Watching it back with the team radio, I don’t think they have done anything wrong, they told him to let him pass and he has slowed down to allow that.
The Red Bull team radio played on sky was not at the same time as Max slowed. Just in case you assumed they played the audio and video at the correct time?
 

Fluctuation0161

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2016
Messages
8,165
Location
Manchester
And so driving someone off the track makes sense. Giving no room makes sense. Something like what happened in Monza makes sense.

But no racing driver is ever going to consider taking someone out by brake testing. Worst case you're taken out, you get a penalty, and you need a new engine and gearbox. While the car behind just loses their front.

It's not like what Vettel did to Hamilton where they were crawling around behind a safety car. At race speed it's just a fools errand.
Considering Max just tried to take out Lewis twice, both times on turn 1 it seems your point is not accurate.

The rear of the car is much stronger the front wing. The front wing is the most delicate part of the car.
 

pauldyson1uk

Full Member
Joined
May 20, 2008
Messages
55,359
Location
Wythenshawe watching Crappy Fims
from Sky F1


Hamilton and Verstappen were summoned to stewards around 20 minutes' ago now, although with press conferences and TV pen interview commitments to fulfil it seems they have only recently headed there.

Who knows when we'll get a verdict, but there's surely plenty of radio transmissions, video angles and telemetry for the stewards' panel to look over in their deliberations before they even take what the drivers have to say into account.
 

Abizzz

Full Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
7,638
from Sky F1


Hamilton and Verstappen were summoned to stewards around 20 minutes' ago now, although with press conferences and TV pen interview commitments to fulfil it seems they have only recently headed there.

Who knows when we'll get a verdict, but there's surely plenty of radio transmissions, video angles and telemetry for the stewards' panel to look over in their deliberations before they even take what the drivers have to say into account.
They probably forgot the cable to download it this time and will announce their verdict after lights out in Abu Dhabi.
 

hp88

Full Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2010
Messages
17,413
Location
W3103
The Red Bull team radio played on sky was not at the same time as Max slowed. Just in case you assumed they played the audio and video at the correct time?
Yeah thought it was in sync with the radio ?
I guess the stewards must have something we are not aware of as it would a bit pointless to call them both up for this.
 

pauldyson1uk

Full Member
Joined
May 20, 2008
Messages
55,359
Location
Wythenshawe watching Crappy Fims
From Sky F1


Sky F1's Damon Hill:

"It will be upon the driver who is letting the other past to do it as safely as possible. But l can't really see what Max did wrong. He may have slowed down abruptly, but I think Lewis was nervous about going alongside him."

FFS Damon, you say he did nothing much wrong, then said he braked abruptly !!
Lewis was nervous FFS utter bullshit Damon.
 

RoadTrip

petitioned for a just cause
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
26,395
Location
Los Pollos Hermanos...
From Sky F1


Sky F1's Damon Hill:

"It will be upon the driver who is letting the other past to do it as safely as possible. But l can't really see what Max did wrong. He may have slowed down abruptly, but I think Lewis was nervous about going alongside him."

FFS Damon, you say he did nothing much wrong, then said he braked abruptly !!
Lewis was nervous FFS utter bullshit Damon.
Yeah I kinda felt he contradicted himself a few times.
 

RoadTrip

petitioned for a just cause
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
26,395
Location
Los Pollos Hermanos...
Norris going in on the tyre change under red flag rule. He's correct too, it's completely trash to allow that to be a thing.
Yep. And so is damage repair. I think at the point of a red flag, it should literally be paused race. Can’t do anything.

The only time I would make an exception is weather related eg. Switching from a dry tyre to a wet tyre.
 

Uniquim

Full Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
5,746
Location
Location, Location
I don’t think so either. But he did slow down right before the accident. But not sure if that was Hamilton speeding up as he realised he was meant to go past as he was getting the message? Or did Max slow down? Unless telemetry says otherwise, I’d give Max the benefit here. It was just a confusing situation caused by bad information sharing with the race director. Massi by the way should be out of the job. It’s common sense to tell the following car before telling the leading car, for this exact reason.
I'd agree with this. I think for me the sum of the matter is that the crash wouldn't have happened if Lewis was aware Max was letting him past. Max is not at fault for Lewis not getting the message in time, and Lewis is not at fault for not getting the radio message in time.

I think the claim about breaking, accelerate, breaking is visible in the replay, because I think Max wanted Lewis to pass him earlier.
If we listen to the engine in this clip, you can hear how early Max slows to let Lewis past, so there's a lot of time for him to do so. Then Max continues to slow, probably with the impression that Lewis was aware he would let him past. It'd be strict if they penalize someone for this.



The question is whether FIA were slow to give the message to Mercedes, or if Mercedes were slow to relay that to Lewis, but it sounded like Max was letting Lewis past very soon after getting the radio message, so FIA might've been telling Mercedes at the same time as Red Bull talked to Max if the FIA told Red Bull first.
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,305
From Sky F1


Sky F1's Damon Hill:

"It will be upon the driver who is letting the other past to do it as safely as possible. But l can't really see what Max did wrong. He may have slowed down abruptly, but I think Lewis was nervous about going alongside him."

FFS Damon, you say he did nothing much wrong, then said he braked abruptly !!
Lewis was nervous FFS utter bullshit Damon.
Damon is as pro Lewis anti Max as they come, so that maybe tells you something.

Racing drivers do not consider brake testing a viable strategy. Try brake testing someone in a kart and see what happens. :lol: