fishfingers15
Contributes to username and tagline changes
the company I work for, sponsors Aston Martin but didn't they once lift Merc's designs earlier?Cheers, been busy and not caught up fully yet.
Horner being Horner
the company I work for, sponsors Aston Martin but didn't they once lift Merc's designs earlier?Cheers, been busy and not caught up fully yet.
Horner being Horner
I would expect nothing else, of course.You think if Alfa Romeo or Tauri rocked up with a body identical to the Mercedes Toto would say nothing about it?
Not that there's any danger of anyone trying to copy Mercedes any time soon.
There was something I remember from years ago, but who and what I can't remember.the company I work for, sponsors Aston Martin but didn't they once lift Merc's designs earlier?
Driver | Team | Time |
1) Charles Leclerc | Ferrari | 1:19.828 |
2) Carlos Sainz | Ferrari | +0.079 |
3) Max Verstappen | Red Bull | +0.336 |
4) George Russell | Mercedes | +0.762 |
5) Fernando Alonso | Alpine | +0.940 |
6) Lewis Hamilton | Mercedes | +0.983 |
7) Lando Norris | McLaren | +1.451 |
8) Pierre Gasly | Alpha Tauri | +1.594 |
9) Daniel Ricciardo | McLaren | +1.909 |
10) Yuki Tsunoda | Alpha Tauri | +1.986 |
11) Esteban Ocon | Alpine | +2.063 |
12) Lance Stroll | Aston Martin | +2.092 |
13) Robert Kubica | Alfa Romeo | +2.147 |
14) Kevin Magnussen | Haas | +2.261 |
15) Mick Schumacher | Haas | +2.318 |
16) Sebastian Vettel | Aston Martin | +2.336 |
17) Valtteri Bottas | Alfa Romeo | +2.786 |
18) Nyck De Vries | Williams | +3.092 |
19) Nicholas Latifi | Williams | +3.183 |
20) Juri Vips | Red Bull | +4.310 |
Not done FP2 times yet, they are coming upPauldy@ did you mean to post fp1 times or fp2 thats just finished?
It does look like they have gotten the porposing under control but lets see what tomorrow brings. Fingers crossed they are competitive again as it will make the season so much more interesting as will the green red bulls.FP2 times are encouraging for Mercedes, hope its not a repeat of Miami and FP3 and qualifying are back to being rubbish.
After Miami not getting excited yet, FP3 see what happens.It does look like they have gotten the porposing under control but lets see what tomorrow brings. Fingers crossed they are competitive again as it will make the season so much more interesting as will the green red bulls.
Yes mentioned on sky f1 coverage. Personally im all for teams copying other teams, it will just bring the pack closer together and lead to better racing.
As long as it’s not done by espionage, it’s all ok, but going by what Horner has said it would of been impossible for the to reverse engineer some of the parts they have in the time frame.Yes mentioned on sky f1 coverage. Personally im all for teams copying other teams, it will just bring the pack closer together and lead to better racing.
Horner is a muppet. How many of the Mercedes powertrain staff have RB poached? How good is the unbranded Honda powerunit now? Pot, kettle, black.As long as it’s not done by espionage, it’s all ok, but going by what Horner has said it would of been impossible for the to reverse engineer some of the parts they have in the time frame.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I will wait for qualification. That will be the real indicator, apart from the race of course.After Miami not getting excited yet, FP3 see what happens.
Well said.Horner is a muppet. How many of the Mercedes powertrain staff have RB poached? How good is the unbranded Honda powerunit now? Pot, kettle, black.
True, they tinkered about with the cars after FP2 in Miami and made it worse, hopefully they wont this time.I will wait for qualification. That will be the real indicator, apart from the race of course.
Sky F1 said Mercedes can turn porposing on and off when they want now. Which implies they have got to the root of the issue and resolved it.True, they tinkered about with the cars after FP2 in Miami and made it worse, hopefully they wont this time.
Where do you draw the line though? If someone comes up with a wing shape and you look into it and the optimal shape is the one the other car has, you're suggesting they should build a less good part so that it looks a bit different?Copying general shapes / ideas I think is fine, but carbon copying elements I cant imagine being legal, essentially you are not doing any design/ innovation you are running a Xerox machine.
Well its the same as IP in business. Patents exist for precisely this reason.Where do you draw the line though? If someone comes up with a wing shape and you look into it and the optimal shape is the one the other car has, you're suggesting they should build a less good part so that it looks a bit different?
They could always turn it on or off when they wanted, only at more of a cost to performance than the other teams.Sky F1 said Mercedes can turn porposing on and off when they want now. Which implies they have got to the root of the issue and resolved it.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I did not see that bit, but when would you want to turn it on ? I would of thought you wanted rid of it 100% of the time.Sky F1 said Mercedes can turn porposing on and off when they want now. Which implies they have got to the root of the issue and resolved it.
I imagine it is more of being able to understand what causes it, so when they do setup adjustments, they don’t reintroduce it.I did not see that bit, but when would you want to turn it on ? I would of thought you wanted rid of it 100% of the time.
I see what you mean now , yeah makes sense, know what is causing so dont do it.I imagine it is more of being able to understand what causes it, so when they do setup adjustments, they don’t reintroduce it.
Knowing when and what causes it, means they can steer clear of it or at least ride the car right on the limit to get the max performance from it.
Yep, "being able to turn it on and off" in engineering is a way to prove to your boss / the customer / whoever is annoyed that you understand the problem and what you need to do to fix it.I see what you mean now , yeah makes sense, know what is causing so dont do it.
Until the 4th time you try it and suddenly it doesn't work anymore and you want to cry *has flash backs to being a Quality Engineer*Yep, "being able to turn it on and off" in engineering is a way to prove to your boss / the customer / whoever is annoyed that you understand the problem and what you need to do to fix it.
You don't try it 4 times, are you mad?! That's just tempting fateUntil the 4th time you try it and suddenly it doesn't work anymore and you want to cry *has flash backs to being a Quality Engineer*
Yeah don't do it if you don't have big d energy. Its not for everyone.You don't try it 4 times, are you mad?! That's just tempting fate
FYI a big d is a "D". I've got a Master's degree, I know these thingsYeah don't do it if you don't have big d energy. Its not for everyone.