1 - So how do we deal with this? Force them to produce something against their will?
I'm a huge Chappelle fan and don't think he should be removed from Netflix for his jokes, but this is true as well. His jokes before never seemed to be politically motivated, though he did make jokes about political topics before as well. Now it just seems forced made with the purpose of not making one laugh but rather making a statement.
Nope. He was always sermonizing. Certainly over the last decade and a half or so. But through all that time he was sermonizing against the "white community." That was fine, right? Now it's against the 'trans community." Not ok, right? Hence the shrieking. Chappelle is not a laugh out loud hilarious comedian. He's amusing. But the spaces between his jokes are getting longer. In those spaces, people are thinking, yeah, maybe has never that funny. And they're right. He wasn't.
That's his whole point and he's quite right about it. It's become about popularity rather than a cause. You can only be offended about something if your chosen topic is flavour of the month. Otherwise nobody cares.
Going back quite a while but that special he did when he goes to the hood and there was a baby on the corner is hilarious as was the True Hollywood stories. He was definitely funny.
Absolutely. When he was at the top of his game he was absolutely hilarious.
That's some proper bullshit. If she were to make a point about about then they'd probably call her entitled
Do you follow altright people on twitter, or did you get the link from someone else?
Nothing wrong with land acknowledgments.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I only follow people I find interesting in some way. What's it to you?
I was just wondering why you're posting that stuff. Just a couple of days ago someone else posted the tweet of a nazi, but in that case it was an innocent mistake. Not what's happening here.
Probably very helpful for blind racists.
I don't get it. You some kind of weirdo?
Probably, but not as weird as that fascist Lomez. The performative empty aesthetics is pretty tiring, though, but expected from someone who hangs out with Moldbug.
You're really into this stuff, huh?
As much as you're into someone awkwardly describing themselves on stage, I guess.
As much as what?
You didn't say your pronouns.
Oh, oh I'm sorry I like to be referred to as "It".
It's pretty weird how people here don't even react to them describing hair colour, beard, glasses, but because they include skin colour then there's suddenly some agenda at play. The video is awkward, sure, but it has absolutely nothing to do with PC gone mad.
They did declare their pronouns. Why would the blind people give a shit about how they look like? Do they even what a caucasian guy looks like?
Now you’re just making stuff up.
Not in the second video.
But if they are born blind, can they even visualize people?
No but there’s a hell of a lot of people who are blind that could once see. Not sure of the exact % probably the majority.
Is it Lomez or Balaji Srinivasan who is altright?
I've always wondered that.
They're only blind mate, they still have the sense of touch which helps them to visualise things around them including other humans.
Lomez. Second guy is some Silicon Valley tech bro. Both connected to Peter Thiel, though, but Lomez very pheripherally I think. Neither very fond of democracy.
