No im using a liverpool fans information to get across the point that football inflation is different to general inflation and also the use of basic maths to help compare like with like.
The result of which is that you cannot compare figures from now and 15 years ago, let alone now and 2 years ago, because of the increase in incoming money.
The table is a way of showing what past transfer values could be approximated to now, (or 2015 in this table).
If you can't understand the concept of football inflation, (+with all the graphs, media coverage of TV and commercial deals ever increasing values of the past 20 years) even with an easy to understand table, then I'm at a bit of a loss.
The table shows clearly, the worst buy ever - not only because of it being top, but also his age, and what schevchenko actually did on the pitch for Chelsea.
That time period seems to show many overpaid, old, Chelsea transfers - the investment without needing to show a profit time by abramovich.
My original post on this thread was in reply to a poster who couldn't conceive of spending £45m on a defender in 2017.
I highlighted Rio as a far higher figure (inflation adjusted).
The reply came back that Rio was the best defender England had, so (approx) STFU.
Whatever the merits of Rio, or Kyle (as he's regularly in England Squad , I presume he's also one of the best defenders in England), the relative difference between kyle's transfer and Rio's adjusted transfer (even at 2015 level) is still £30m odd higher...about 40%.. which makes a mockery of the 'shock' of the poster I was replying to.