FrenchRed
Full Member
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2015
- Messages
- 612
I think my earlier question is rather misinterpreted, mostly due to my use of ‘conversion rate’ as a term.I'm not arguing that Lukaku was as good as RVP though.
A poster implied the problem with Lukaku was that he wasn't clinical enough. The comparison with RVP just makes it very clear that isn't the problem. Chance for chance Lukaku was more clinical than RVP, demostrably and irrefutably so.
However, you can still absolutely argue that RVP being a better all round footballer saw him create more chances for himself and/or aided us in creating more chances for him, which is what saw him carry the team by scoring a bundle of goals.
People are still free to criticise Lukaku, they just shouldn't criticise him for being wasteful. His flaws are in other aspects of his game. However, it would also be silly to pretend that playing under Mourinho for most of his United career isn't also a factor in Lukaku's chance stats.
Reassessing, my issue centers around the amount of time not that he misses a sitter, but how many times he turns a ‘half chance’ into a real chance of a goal. Be it first touch, losing the ball, or being too slow to react, it seems like he should be doing much better at creating chances for himself to shoot.
I think this is borne out by the stats posted about him having half the number of chances than his rivals... it’s not just about lack of creativity in the team, but of him not carving out shooting chances from good positions himself.