OT EVACUATED | Device signed as having been recovered, could NOT be detected by sniffer dogs

rcoobc

Not as crap as eferyone thinks
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
41,701
Location
C-137
Facts would indicate that the external company contractor majorly blundered.
Of course they did, but as we've been discussing for 20 pages, United should have found it in the intervening 4 days

Now if it doesn't contain anything that can be found by sniffer dogs, and was in a place that no one was likely to find it... Well maybe United are truly blameless.
 

Drifter

American
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
68,363
Well i think that security firm will no longer be used. G4S may be available though.
 

peridigm

Full Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
13,866
I don't think you can insure against stupidity!
Insurance companies do sell insurance against negligence and employee misconduct as well as many other things that could fall into the stupid category. It's just a question of whether you want to pay for it. I run an IT service business and have insurance to protect against data loss whether it came from hardware failure or something an employee did. I'd imagine a security firm would need pretty substantial coverages due to the nature of their work. Any business that hires another business will also require proof of insurance or a certificate of insurance with coverage levels. It protects both the client and the business because shit happens, just like Sunday.
 

Zebs

Clare Baldings Daughter plays too much Wordscapes
Joined
Feb 7, 2008
Messages
17,028
Media are awfully quiet on Woody's statement.

All gutted that it absolves us of any blame.
 

Cina

full member
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
50,911
So the security company made and planted a device that

a) their own team of experts whose job it is to find and disarm devices couldn't find and
b) sniffer dogs couldn't find cause technically it wasn't actually an explosive device of any sort

I feel like they're not really getting the point of the whole 'security test' thing.
 

Shamwow

listens to shit music & watches Mrs Brown's Boys
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
13,969
Location
Spiderpig
I imagine in future such devices will be clearly labelled as bogus, and display a serial number and phone number of the contractor to enable a quick check. Hindsight is a wonderful thing.
What if a terrorist sticks a similar sign on their device?
 

Damien

Self-Aware RedCafe Database (and Admin)
Staff
Joined
Mar 4, 2010
Messages
97,229
Location
Also won Best Gif/Photoshop 2021
I imagine in future such devices will be clearly labelled as bogus, and display a serial number and phone number of the contractor to enable a quick check. Hindsight is a wonderful thing.
Would be easy enough for terrorists to do similar. People aren't going to check a device like that until a controlled explosion has taken place. Too risky.
 

Cina

full member
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
50,911
I imagine in future such devices will be clearly labelled as bogus, and display a serial number and phone number of the contractor to enable a quick check. Hindsight is a wonderful thing.
"ORDINARY NON EXPLOSIVE DEVICE, PLEASE IGNORE"

Seems legit.
 

Judas

Open to offers
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
36,120
Location
Where the grass is greener.
Why just not use something that is obviously not a bomb? It seems ridiculous that they used such a life like object. A packet of Monster Munch would have done the job, the people who being trained know its all pretend anyway, so why does the bomb need to look like a bomb.
 

McDonagh707

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2011
Messages
260
Location
W3103
Well i think that security firm will no longer be used. G4S may be available though.
The MD of the company used in the training exercise previously worked for G4S 'where he was responsible for training guards involved in search and screening'.
 

Will Absolute

New Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2009
Messages
7,982
Location
Southern Ireland
What if a terrorist sticks a similar sign on their device?
That's where the serial number comes in. When contacted on the phone the contractor would have a list of legit serial numbers. Or the club itself might have the list. No one would have to touch the 'bomb'. Just read a number.
 

CassiusClaymore

Is it Gaizka Mendieta?
Scout
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
35,869
Location
None of your business mate
Supports
The greatest team in history
Why just not use something that is obviously not a bomb? It seems ridiculous that they used such a life like object. A packet of Monster Munch would have done the job, the people who being trained know its all pretend anyway, so why does the bomb need to look like a bomb.
What if terrorists start using explosive packets of monster munch?
 

JustAFan

The Adebayo Akinfenwa of football photoshoppers
Joined
Sep 15, 2010
Messages
32,377
Location
An evil little city in the NE United States
So the security company made and planted a device that

a) their own team of experts whose job it is to find and disarm devices couldn't find and
b) sniffer dogs couldn't find cause technically it wasn't actually an explosive device of any sort

I feel like they're not really getting the point of the whole 'security test' thing.
a) Well shows they need some extra training on where to look.
b) Funny how that works.

Remember reading once about some drug enforcement officers using drug sniffing dogs at a school as a training exercise. They used some actual packets of drugs (from evidence locker or old cases or something) and hid them around the school (it was during summer while school was out). But did the same thing the security company did, forgot one of the packages, which was hidden in one of the lockers. Come the fall when school was back in session, kid gets assigned a locker and finds a bag of drugs in it. The kid alerted the nearest teacher of his find.
 

JustAFan

The Adebayo Akinfenwa of football photoshoppers
Joined
Sep 15, 2010
Messages
32,377
Location
An evil little city in the NE United States
Why just not use something that is obviously not a bomb? It seems ridiculous that they used such a life like object. A packet of Monster Munch would have done the job, the people who being trained know its all pretend anyway, so why does the bomb need to look like a bomb.

they know it is a drill, but the issue with training is that you are actually trying to train them on what to look for, so you use something realistic looking.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,757
Location
india
I can't help but :lol: at this security agency.

How the hell do you manage to

1. Run a training for your personnel/handlers where they don't find all the items placed for them to find
2. Forget about the above item that wasn't found and walk off giving zero fecks
3. Let 2. happen knowing fully well that it wasn't the sort of item sniffer dogs will find on the routine pre match check
 

Cina

full member
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
50,911
No wonder the sniffer dogs didn't detect the device if they're constantly sniffing for packets of Monster Munch.
 

Judas

Open to offers
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
36,120
Location
Where the grass is greener.
they know it is a drill, but the issue with training is that you are actually trying to train them on what to look for.
It's not like there 5 different designs for a bomb though, is it? They can literally come in all shapes and sizes, and look a hundred different ways. It isn't a Bugs Bunny cartoon where its just that classic textbook bomb look.
 

Uniquim

Full Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
5,746
Location
Location, Location
What about when you ring the number on the device which is now labelled as harmless and that actually detonates it.?
THIS IS A DUMMY DEVICE - IF FOUND PLEASE PHONE 0732532662 ... and the bomb explodes when you ring it.
Surely they could have an official number for all things bombs, with a redirectory function for companies that are licensed to deal with such things. So the number on the bomb would be a familiar short number, similar to 999, and then if the service is digital, it would also have a company number that you enter after you've called the first number.

i.e. you dial the number (let's say 777, and then when you're connected, you enter the second number listed on the device, say "051", which is also registered in the call-up service, and can then connect you to the company.
 

Will Absolute

New Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2009
Messages
7,982
Location
Southern Ireland
I think it's not beyond the ingenuity of man to safely ring the security contractor - perhaps the club might have the number or directory inquiries might be employed?:smirk: - and say: 'We found a device at OT. It's labelled ***** and has serial number *****. Is it one of yours?
 

SammyUnited_83

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2011
Messages
3,199
I still find it impossible to believe that nobody at the club would request to know where these devices were placed.

Surely, at some point this would have come up in conversation?
 

Badunk

Shares his caf joinday with Dante
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
12,953
Location
Occupied Merseyside
I'd like all the posters who were crying SHAMBLES and EMBARRASSING to come in here and apologise to the normal people.
 

SammyUnited_83

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2011
Messages
3,199
I think it's not beyond the ingenuity of man to safely ring the security contractor - perhaps the club might have the number or directory inquiries might be employed?:smirk: - and say: 'We found a device at OT. It's labelled ***** and has serial number *****. Is it one of yours?
Though in fairness, the security company did sign a piece of paper saying they had taken all 13, with 75,000 people in the stadium, would you then trust someones word if they said 'Ah shit, yep, sorry, I will collect it tomorrow'.

Once they found the device it was almost impossible not to order an evacuation.
 

rcoobc

Not as crap as eferyone thinks
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
41,701
Location
C-137
It's just two times human error

First human error - Device was forgotten about
Second human error - Device was not discovered in checks.

In future: GPS Tracking on all similar devices, a unique identifying code so that if they are discovered, staff can quickly establish it's just a fake, and obviously more god damned checks.
 

SammyUnited_83

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2011
Messages
3,199
I'd like all the posters who were crying SHAMBLES and EMBARRASSING to come in here and apologise to the normal people.
We have heard one side of the story, and I have previously mentioned the club showed negligence by not knowing where these devices were in the 1st place.
 

Scarecrow

Having a week off
Joined
Feb 6, 2012
Messages
12,299
Why just not use something that is obviously not a bomb? It seems ridiculous that they used such a life like object. A packet of Monster Munch would have done the job, the people who being trained know its all pretend anyway, so why does the bomb need to look like a bomb.
They're trained to recognize a suspicious device among a number of non-suspicious devices. That's a distinction one has to be able to make, I believe. Training them to just "find something" is hardly a great preparation.
 

Sarni

nice guy, unassuming, objective United fan.
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Messages
57,717
Location
Krakow
Surely they could have an official number for all things bombs, with a redirectory function for companies that are licensed to deal with such things. So the number on the bomb would be a familiar short number, similar to 999, and then if the service is digital, it would also have a company number that you enter after you've called the first number.

i.e. you dial the number (let's say 777, and then when you're connected, you enter the second number listed on the device, say "051", which is also registered in the call-up service, and can then connect you to the company.
Nope, it's too much fuss and cost to set it up for very few incidents like this. Just don't leave these items behind.
 

RORY65

Full Member
Joined
May 28, 2009
Messages
4,535
I'd like all the posters who were crying SHAMBLES and EMBARRASSING to come in here and apologise to the normal people.
I wasn't one of those posters and think it's a bit silly to try and link this to the inept way the football team has been run in recent years but does this statement really clarify how a random member of the public spotted this device when no one within the club did within 4 days?
 

Sarni

nice guy, unassuming, objective United fan.
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Messages
57,717
Location
Krakow
We have heard one side of the story, and I have previously mentioned the club showed negligence by not knowing where these devices were in the 1st place.
Why would the club care? It was a test ran by outside services company that did not interest the club. They allowed them to use the stadium trusting them to do their job half properly.
 

rcoobc

Not as crap as eferyone thinks
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
41,701
Location
C-137
I'd like all the posters who were crying SHAMBLES and EMBARRASSING to come in here and apologise to the normal people.
You are on a forum where people say it's a "disgrace" when a team only manages a 2-2 draw.