Raw
Full Member
Views on the game from Sir Bobby himself
I love possession football. I was looking forward to it the day LVG's arrival was announced.Need to play with the urgency we showed at 1-0 at the start of game. Blitz teams with wave of wave of attack instead of boring ourselves with possession between our defenders before hoofing it.
Provides much needed variation in pace, is always looking to create chances in and around the box with quick incisive passing/ give and go's, and has got an eye for goal. He reminds me a little of Scholes. Should be a regular starter.This FA Cup season has been...interesting...
We didn't show any kind of push until we went down a goal, which seems to be too frequent with us now. This probably ties into LVG's approach of patient possession football but a quick turn of foot is what will more likely cut open teams in the lower divisions. Our buildup in the first half was too labored and we never got a serious look at goal.
Hurting us was the lack of pace shown by Falcao and Rooney, who couldn't get to through-balls quickly enough and kept causing our attack to break down. Rooney I could excuse because he hasn't played in the striker role for weeks, but Falcao was simply awful and should've come off at halftime. There were a few balls that were played through by Di Maria and Rooney that Falcao in previous seasons would've been able to make something of, but absolutely nothing was coming off. I think the Falcao experiment needs to end and Wilson should have his playing time increased.
The Preston goal came off a bad luck deflection but I don't think our defenders were particularly good today. Smalling won a few good battles in the air but he looked shaky with his positioning and seemed to have trouble holding ground against the Preston attackers. Rojo was also sloppy with the ball. Shaw was probably best of the four and covered the touchline well. The ball had a grenade-like quality in our backfield, as usual.
It should be obvious now that Herrara gives us that extra something where chances are created and we look a bit more dangerous. Fellaini also should be starting against any kind of physical side since he gives us the height and strength that we lack. Young was an ideal sub, as he kept switching sides to open up the game. I'm pleased with how well he's done this season.
Congrats also to Rooney for getting back on the scoresheet. It's been a long time!
If we go by the rule, Rooney can't be said to be obstructing and that's what ref will consider. Keeper should have dived for the ball regardless because if he was aware that Rooney was in offside position, Rooney tapping in opposite corner would have been disallowed anyway.Not really a question of obstruction.
In the split second the action unfolded, the keeper can't be expected to say to himself, 'Rooney is offside, so I can ignore him, and dive to my right as if he wasn't there. " He's more likely to think, 'I can't dive to my right, because if I do, Rooney will tap the ball into the opposite corner.'
So Rooney's presence may have influenced the outcome.
I think there's still a prevailing thing in English football culture that footballers should be 'hard men'. I don't think most people would say the challenge wasn't worthy of a penalty, the problem people have is that they think that Rooney avoiding contact and not getting his leg smashed means that in some way he didn't 'earn' it. It's probably a hangover from the macho heyday of English football in the 80s that some fans and pundits like to get all nostalgic about.Cant bealive the hoopla about the penalty-slow news day I guess. The only thing Wayne didnt do correctly was to get a touch from the keeper. What Wayne tried to do is an excepted part of the game. If the goalie had pulled out of the tackle before reaching Wayne, that would be a different then.
Indeed. Just like Chelsea should be beating Bradford and City should be beating Middlesborough. Somehow these things turn out to be not as easy as we expect.Can't believe the technical talk on the forum. United should under normal circumstances be beating teams such as Preston with ease regardless of formations or choice of players.
Wrong on both. The keeper fell foul of either "kicks or attempts to kick an opponent" or "trips or attempts to trip an opponent". In either case, as the offense was in the penalty area, it's a penalty. That Rooney avoided being either kicked or tripped is irrelevant - what matters was the goalkeeper's action.It's an obvious dive/yellow card. Rooney makes no attempt to land his right foot on the floor to keep him stood up. Does it extremely well, mind. Could easily have stayed on is feet for me.
Personally I'd also disallow the goal for offside though I do accept you can argue otherwise by stretching this ludicrous offside Law quite a long way. Wayne looks pretty 'active' to me given he's in the 6 yard box and is putting off the GK.
About time we got a few of these though, innit?
Indeed. Just like Chelsea should be beating Bradford and City should be beating Middlesborough. Somehow these things turn out to be not as easy as we expect.
I still don't agree but I did think last night that GKs are generally allowed to be more 'reckless' than outfield players - what is a foul regardless of contact, and as you describe, is automatically penalised in normal play but some slightly different interpretation occurs for keepers in the box. - as they slide wildly out for balls they are not reaching and requiring forwards to get out of the way.Wrong on both. The keeper fell foul of either "kicks or attempts to kick an opponent" or "trips or attempts to trip an opponent". In either case, as the offense was in the penalty area, it's a penalty. That Rooney avoided being either kicked or tripped is irrelevant - what matters was the goalkeeper's action.
The "offside" was a perfect example of case 7 in the interpretations. In the absence of movements or gestures intended to put the keeper off, it's not offside.
Hold your breaths, everyone: bringing the game into disrepute charge coming up for Stuckmann.Stuckmann is adamant the penalty should not have been awarded.
“I say it clear: ‘That was no penalty,’” he said. “I also believe that, if the situation had happened the other way around, one of our strikers against the United keeper, the ref wouldn’t have given the penalty. I have no doubt about that.”
How about davies not being sent off? What if that was the other way around and it was rooney? Bellend.http://www.theguardian.com/football...orry-fa-cup-penalty-manchester-united-preston
Hold your breaths, everyone: bringing the game into disrepute charge coming up for Stuckmann.
Phil Dowd