Hephaestus
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2018
- Messages
- 5,188
Haven't they had a couple of good ones of late?DC movies are a right mess.
But..... but.... but..... it's Batman.Don't really care tbh...
This!Nooo, he's become one of the more interesting actors around lately. Hope he's got better taste than that.
Nick Jonas is a better actor than Pattinson.At least it's not Nick fecking Jonas
If Michael Keaton could pull it off then anyone can.Needs to add serious mass.
In fairness after the vampire films Pattinson has been in some brilliant movies and is far better actor than Affleck.- "We need someone to play batman"
- "Did you know there's a type of bat called Vampire bat?"
- "Astonishing. Maybe someone who's played a vampire before would make a good batman?"
- "Say no more fam, I got this"
Hollywood casting at its finest.
Wonder Woman and Aquaman were pretty good, but aside from those they've been serving up shite since Nolan/Bale bowed out.Haven't they had a couple of good ones of late?
Because the kind of people who get upset about these kind of things, don’t watch any other kind of films.Interesting choice and he was very good in Good Time, High Life and The Lost City of Z so not sure why people are so upset.
Er... excuse me sir I'll have you know that the Nolan Batman films are true art house cinema.Because the kind of people who get upset about these kind of things, don’t watch any other kind of films.
Stupid people who only watch stupid movies have unsurprisingly a lot of stupid opinions.Why are people only associating him with Twilight?
Because they have the cultural appreciation of teenage boys, and are thus only aware of him being in something for teenage girls. Ew.Why are people only associating him with Twilight?
He's a cracking actor who's been in some excellent films recently. This is a great choice (for the people making the film, if not for him)