He was simply fantastic that season. I find it very amusing when some people around here question the wisdom of buying him. That season alone was worth it.
Agree with that.
Their arguments fall into 3 main categories
The signing gave less game time to Hernandez, Welbeck and maybe Kagawa, and put Rooney's nose out of joint.
On the whole a I find United winning trophies more important then the personal careers of individuals players,although I'm saddened it meant less games for Welbeck or pushed him out wide.
United were less pleasing to the eye with Van Persie up front.
I find that odd because Van Persie was part of an Arsenal side who have probably been the best footballing side in the PL the past decade. I think the quality of United's football was already in decline by the time Van Persie came to United.
That United would have still won the league if Fergie had invested in midfield instead of Van Persie.
I find that a pretty strange and bold claim. For a start it should never be an either/or situation. It assumes if United had not got Van Persie, Fergie would have invested in midfield, an area I feel he had neglected for 3 or 4 years.
The last argument smacks of the kind of complacency and arrogance which led to the appointment of Moyes considering Van Persie's goals more or less won United the title by mid Feb, not withstanding he might have gone to City.