- Joined
- Jul 9, 2015
- Messages
- 487
So a 6'3 professional footballer guy cannot win headers or kick properly and it is the manager's fault now.So it was his fault that the manager put a striker who can't clear to defend a set piece?
So a 6'3 professional footballer guy cannot win headers or kick properly and it is the manager's fault now.So it was his fault that the manager put a striker who can't clear to defend a set piece?
He is actually the one at most fault for our bad football in big games other than mourinho. Mourinho's football in big games depends very largely on the front man being able to win the aerial duels and keep the ball under pressure so as to allow us to break at them, something lukaku has shown he is completely and utterly rubbish at be it at everton or man utd. His inability to hold the ball leads to just us defending never having an outlet to break unless one of the other players makes a nearly full pitch run to get to their attacking third.I'm really tired of this nonsense debate. My point was that only in the city game can we blame him for dropped points. Take it how you want, I'm done.
Kick properly & make clearance are two different things. Make clearance is about anticipation.So a 6'3 professional footballer guy cannot win headers or kick properly and it is the manager's fault now.
In what sense?Andy Cole all over again it seems on here.
His game isn’t direct balls, despite his height and physique.Obviously hasn't had a chance so far but sometimes I wonder how he always fails to get anything on those long balls. He either overruns them, doesn't jump, or just flicks it to nowhere. Really needs to improve his timing and reading the high balls.
He was ALWAYS criticized and considered a striker who 'needed 10 chances to score'. He was a polarizing figure among fans.In what sense?
Have to agree. Think he's having a functional performance thus far.His link-up and hold-up play has been good today, particularly in the few phases of play we've just had around the 30th - 36th minute mark.
Oh right. Dont think there was ever a debate on Cole's ability on the ball or his willingness to get himself around, though. Standards were much higher back then as well.He was ALWAYS criticized and considered a striker who 'needed 10 chances to score'. He was a polarizing figure among fans.
It's the type of thing where it doesn't matter if it's his game or not, he has to do better for those. It's a simple jump up in the air and timing it better. He sprints past every timeHis game isn’t direct balls, despite his height and physique.
That’s why he struggles with them.
Everton never played that way either.
I’m not sure why Jose keeps insisting otherwise.
He’s not good in the air, hence why he gets beat so often.It's the type of thing where it doesn't matter if it's his game or not, he has to do better for those. It's a simple jump up in the air and timing it better. He sprints past every time
They took issue with him taking chances though, as much as they do now with Lukaku's apparent issues, it doesn't have to be the same criticism.Oh right. Dont think there was ever a debate on Cole's ability on the ball or his willingness to get himself around, though. Standards were much higher back then as well.
I know it's not his strength but he pretty much just misses the ball every time. Not like he gets shrugged off all the time (which is another issue), he just overruns it and misses itHe’s not good in the air, hence why he gets beat so often.
Judging him for his weaknesses when we don’t play to his strengths is bizarre to me.
I understand that - I’ve openly said that he’s not good at it, you are admitting that you know it’s not his strength.I know it's not his strength but he pretty much just misses the ball every time. Not like he gets shrugged off all the time (which is another issue), he just overruns it and misses it
He has been much better but he's fluffed two opportunities. One was an air shot and the other right at the end where his poor first touch made the chance a lot harder. He has fought with the centre back and closed better than usual though.Been really good today. Shame our players can't create anything for him.
It's not like it's overall on the ball ability - genuinely think it's something he can improve on with training or just timing his runs better. Especially as in the box he suddenly knows what to do with his head. He's good when he's trying to score but when he's just heading to win the ball it's way different for him.I understand that - I’ve openly said that he’s not good at it, you are admitting that you know it’s not his strength.
But you’re implying that he should just suddenly change and be better at it all of a sudden?
Getting frustrated at his ability in the air and you’ll end up pretty angry.
In what market is that in? Don't be silly.Big Rom is a decent striker. But nowhere near worth 75m. more like around 40
Yup. People seem to have forgotten what a United caliber #9 is. Van Persie, Rooney, Van Nistelrooy, Cole, Yorke, Cantona, Hughes, etc.. iin between these strikers, we basically just had people fill in until we found a solution. Lukaku is more "fill in" standard rather then United quality.Good performance? standards must seriously be low of what is expected of a world-class striker capable of playing for this club.
He's been OK. Hasn't done anything bad, but he's hardly been a menace which is what you expect of a top United 9.
After that half this is what you come out with?dreading watching this donkey upfront for the next 5 years
Ridiculous to say that after that half especially, really don’t know what games people watch sometimesdreading watching this donkey upfront for the next 5 years
If you have a the chance to shoot from the box with free sight, a chance had obviously been created and the word «nothing» seems stupid. He got a great chance and missed it because he’s too fecking slow at pulling the trigger, as usual. Him and Martial really should be studying videos of Aguero and KaneGreat half but nothing has been created for him bar the chance at the end.
If he scores, people criticise his general play.Good performance? standards must seriously be low of what is expected of a world-class striker capable of playing for this club.
He's been OK. Hasn't done anything bad, but he's hardly been a menace which is what you expect of a top United 9.
Its like what one decent cross, couple of decent wall passes, one good long ball. That now constitutes a good performance from a £75m player, not to mention the last chance where he was having to bring it back on to his left foot when the natural thing is to touch that ball into space from Sanchez header and smack that with your right.Yup. People seem to have forgotten what a United caliber #9 is. Van Persie, Rooney, Van Nistelrooy, Cole, Yorke, Cantona, Hughes, etc.. iin between these strikers, we basically just had people fill in until we found a solution. Lukaku is more "fill in" standard rather then United quality.