pauldyson1uk
Full Member
Jesus all we need now it that prick Barton to come out and say Rooney was wrong.
Probably not.
I have seen nothing to indicate that the members of the FA disciplinary panel are familiar with the game of football.
If you take a shit on the bog Redknapp has an opinion about itRedknapp has some fecking balls to give his opinion on this matter.The fat fecking ugly hypocrite
Claymore - WUM
If you take a shit on the bog Redknapp has an opinion about it
He'll probably try and sign it for a packet of minstrels and Robbie Keane
If you take a shit on the bog Redknapp has an opinion about it
He'll probably try and sign it for a packet of minstrels and Robbie Keane
BBC are reporting that without appealing it'll be a two game ban, maybe the thought is with an appeal it can be reduced to a fine?Some are talking as if the ban is definite, the way it read to me was that it could be a fine or a ban..
unless you are John TerryBBC are reporting that without appealing it'll be a two game ban, maybe the thought is with an appeal it can be reduced to a fine?
Either way, the ban looks likely, since appeals don't tend to work.
You've got a lot of stick in this thread but if you seriously think people were ok with Drogba being banned because he said "fecking" then you're off your head.OK mate, I'm sorry. What Rooney did was wonderful, best thing I've ever seen and I think all players should swear at the camera or say things every game. I also think the FA should give him a Farleys rusk and a special award for this brilliant act. Drogba swearing at the camera was so much worse because fire came out his mouth and melted the expenisve video camera.
That better?
He did...Good point by someone on Twitter. What if a foreign player swears in his native language on camera? Is that fine because no one will understand it?
Then question then arises that, should Rooney learn how to abuse in another language?
You talk like the FA have an ounce of sense, or a spine.I really feel he will just get a warning or mostly a fine. The FA should take into consideration what Rooney's intentions were and then judge the incident on that....
Of course, that goes without saying. He's got the tears of a lion that man, wouldn't want him to bring those out.unless you are John Terry
But you did smash your girlfriends face in, in a barStan Collymore- "I've scored last minute winners, but I didn't resort to using the F-word."
He screamed "SON OF A WHORE!" in Spanish after scoring against West Brom once.Ronaldo sweared something along the lines in his native language, didn't he? Putaaaaa or something like that
This is the passage:Why is it whenever something like this happens, everyone outside of the FA's regulations whinges about consistency, incompetence, the media etc. instead of addressing the actual problem and calling the integrity of the FA into question?
If you can't make calls without common sense, bias or prejudice then you should be stopped from being allowed to make any decisions of similar nature straight away. The FA actually base half of their decisions on bias and prejudice, and none on common sense, and until someone calls them up for what's actually going on they're going to carry on doing it.
Imagine if a Court of Law started operating as the FA do. How many decisions would it be allowed to make before someone put a stop to it. One? maybe two at most?
The ban shouldn't be that much of an issue for United, but it's just so embarassing and soul destroying that a governing body operates this way and no one has the balls to say or do anything about it. It's been going on like this for about five years now.
So basically anyone can be done for anything, so long as a sufficient media crusade is launched to whip said non-incident into a frenzyA participant shall at all times act in the best interests of the game and shall not act in any manner which is improper or brings the game into disrepute or use any one, or a combination of, violent conduct, serious foul play, threatening, abusive, indecent or insulting words or behaviour.
Your analogy is funny because you now believe that Rooney was telling the FA to feck off - interesting.
There you go again.Well he kind of was when he decided to swear directly at the camera, knowing they will be watching. He may as well have gone the whole hog.
But no, I was just highlighting that people swearing on the pitch elsewhere is not the same as going up to the camera and swearing down the lens. It hasn't and never will be the same, which is precisely why MOST players have the sense not to do that. The ones that do, IE Drogba and Rooney are punished for it.
Lets wait until other players do it before demanding consistency and not use unrelated/different incidents to compare.
So you're saying that all the hundreds of players in the league have no passion when they score goals, because THEY DON'T swear at the camera?
I'm getting bored of saying this....... BECAUSE THOSE PLAYERS DO NOT PUT THEIR FACE TO THE CAMERA AND TELL THE VIEWERS (WHOEVER THEY MAY BE) TO F*CK OFF. Simple enough?
Ugh. The other problem is that the FA don't like being questioned and appeals can lead to extra games being added to the ban.BBC are reporting that without appealing it'll be a two game ban, maybe the thought is with an appeal it can be reduced to a fine?
Either way, the ban looks likely, since appeals don't tend to work.
Then wait for the FA to come up with stuff like "abusive and improper title celebration"All this recent targeting of us will only make it sweeter when we once again become champions in May